An interaction effect of visitor moral emotions and perceived defensible space on flower picking in national forest recreation areas.

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Taiwan Journal of Forest Science Pub Date : 2009-06-01 DOI:10.7075/TJFS.200906.0079
Liang-Chih Chang, Chaur‐Tzuhn Chen
{"title":"An interaction effect of visitor moral emotions and perceived defensible space on flower picking in national forest recreation areas.","authors":"Liang-Chih Chang, Chaur‐Tzuhn Chen","doi":"10.7075/TJFS.200906.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore the interaction effects of visitors' moral emotions and their perception of defensible space on flower picking in national forest recreation areas. Moral emotions consist of guilt, embarrassment, and shame. Perceived defensible space is composed of perceived environmental image, traces of occupancy, and symbolic barriers. Self-reported data were collected from 237 visitors to the Kenting National Forest Recreation Area and 266 visitors to the Tengjhih National Forest Recreation Area through a questionnaire on moral emotions, perceived defensible space, and flower picking. Data were analyzed using a multiple regression analysis and slope analysis of the response functions. The results indicated an interference interaction effect of moral emotions and perceived defensible space on flower picking. Specifically, the results pointed out that visitors’ moral emotions were not significantly related to flower picking if they perceived the defensible space of the area as more obvious, but their moral emotions significantly influenced flower picking if they perceived the defensible space of the area as less obvious. Perceived defensible space was not significantly related to flower picking among visitors with higher moral emotions, but the perceived defensible space significantly influenced flower picking among visitors with lower moral emotions. Implications of the results are further discussed in the study.","PeriodicalId":22180,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"79-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.200906.0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the interaction effects of visitors' moral emotions and their perception of defensible space on flower picking in national forest recreation areas. Moral emotions consist of guilt, embarrassment, and shame. Perceived defensible space is composed of perceived environmental image, traces of occupancy, and symbolic barriers. Self-reported data were collected from 237 visitors to the Kenting National Forest Recreation Area and 266 visitors to the Tengjhih National Forest Recreation Area through a questionnaire on moral emotions, perceived defensible space, and flower picking. Data were analyzed using a multiple regression analysis and slope analysis of the response functions. The results indicated an interference interaction effect of moral emotions and perceived defensible space on flower picking. Specifically, the results pointed out that visitors’ moral emotions were not significantly related to flower picking if they perceived the defensible space of the area as more obvious, but their moral emotions significantly influenced flower picking if they perceived the defensible space of the area as less obvious. Perceived defensible space was not significantly related to flower picking among visitors with higher moral emotions, but the perceived defensible space significantly influenced flower picking among visitors with lower moral emotions. Implications of the results are further discussed in the study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家森林游憩区游客道德情绪与感知防御空间对采花的交互作用
摘要本研究旨在探讨游客道德情绪与防卫空间知觉对国家森林游憩区采花行为的交互作用。道德情感包括内疚、尴尬和羞耻。可感知防御空间由可感知的环境形象、占用痕迹和象征性障碍组成。以垦丁国家森林游憩区237名游客和腾志海国家森林游憩区266名游客为研究对象,采用道德情绪、防卫空间感知和采花问卷等方式收集自述数据。数据分析采用多元回归分析和斜率分析的响应函数。结果表明,道德情绪与感知防卫空间对采花行为存在干扰交互作用。具体而言,研究结果指出,当游客感知到防卫空间较明显时,其道德情绪对采花行为的影响不显著;当游客感知到防卫空间较不明显时,其道德情绪对采花行为的影响显著。道德情绪较高的游客感知防卫空间对采花行为的影响不显著,而道德情绪较低的游客感知防卫空间对采花行为的影响显著。研究结果的意义将在本研究中进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Taiwan Journal of Forest Science is an academic publication that welcomes contributions from around the world. The journal covers all aspects of forest research, both basic and applied, including Forest Biology and Ecology (tree breeding, silviculture, soils, etc.), Forest Management (watershed management, forest pests and diseases, forest fire, wildlife, recreation, etc.), Biotechnology, and Wood Science. Manuscripts acceptable to the journal include (1) research papers, (2) research notes, (3) review articles, and (4) monographs. A research note differs from a research paper in its scope which is less-comprehensive, yet it contains important information. In other words, a research note offers an innovative perspective or new discovery which is worthy of early disclosure.
期刊最新文献
Pinus sylvestris Can Form Ectomycorrhiza with Phialocephala fortinii Carbon Storage and Density of Forest Ecosystems in Heilongjiang Province, China Building allometric models to estimate above-ground and below-ground biomass of mahogany sapling. Effects of Soil Properties on Restoring Indigenous Plants in Coral Reef Landscapes Response variations of Alnus subcordata (L.), Populus deltoides (Bartr. ex Marsh.), and Taxodium distichum (L.) seedlings to flooding stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1