A Comparative Study of the Academic Performance of Resident and Non‑resident Students at a Rural South African University

T. Sikhwari, N. G. Dama, A. Gadisi, Tshifhiwa Christinah Matodzi
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Academic Performance of Resident and Non‑resident Students at a Rural South African University","authors":"T. Sikhwari, N. G. Dama, A. Gadisi, Tshifhiwa Christinah Matodzi","doi":"10.24085/jsaa.v8i1.3468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lack of sufficient accommodation in many South African universities has forced many students to reside outside the campus and commute to attend classes as commuter students. Research indicates that living on campus is related to gains in social and personal competence. The level of competence gained may help students living on campus (resident students) to be more successful in their courses. The purpose of this study was to compare the academic performance of resident and non‑resident students at a university in Limpopo Province. The study employed a survey design. Systematic sampling and snowball sampling methods were used to select 1 769 participants from both resident and non‑resident students. A questionnaire was used to collect data. The main finding from this study is that the academic performance of resident students is slightly better than that of non‑resident students – hence, residing on campus is an advantage. The study concludes that campus environment, student involvement as well as student academic and social integration into the institution tend to account for effects of living on‑campus versus living off‑campus. Furthermore, academic and social integration of students at university are essential for study commitment, success and preventing students from dropping out. The study recommends that future research should focus on the direct influence of resident versus commuter status on such outcomes as degree aspiration, satisfaction with university and institutional persistence.","PeriodicalId":32008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Student Affairs in Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Student Affairs in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v8i1.3468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Lack of sufficient accommodation in many South African universities has forced many students to reside outside the campus and commute to attend classes as commuter students. Research indicates that living on campus is related to gains in social and personal competence. The level of competence gained may help students living on campus (resident students) to be more successful in their courses. The purpose of this study was to compare the academic performance of resident and non‑resident students at a university in Limpopo Province. The study employed a survey design. Systematic sampling and snowball sampling methods were used to select 1 769 participants from both resident and non‑resident students. A questionnaire was used to collect data. The main finding from this study is that the academic performance of resident students is slightly better than that of non‑resident students – hence, residing on campus is an advantage. The study concludes that campus environment, student involvement as well as student academic and social integration into the institution tend to account for effects of living on‑campus versus living off‑campus. Furthermore, academic and social integration of students at university are essential for study commitment, success and preventing students from dropping out. The study recommends that future research should focus on the direct influence of resident versus commuter status on such outcomes as degree aspiration, satisfaction with university and institutional persistence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非一所农村大学居民与非居民学生学习成绩的比较研究
许多南非大学缺乏足够的住宿,迫使许多学生住在校园外,作为通勤学生通勤上课。研究表明,住在校园里与社交能力和个人能力的提高有关。获得的能力水平可以帮助住在校园里的学生(住校学生)在他们的课程中取得更大的成功。本研究的目的是比较林波波省一所大学的居民和非居民学生的学习成绩。这项研究采用了调查设计。采用系统抽样和滚雪球抽样的方法,从本地和非本地学生中抽取了1 769名参与者。问卷调查是用来收集数据的。这项研究的主要发现是,住校学生的学习成绩略好于非住校学生,因此,住校是一种优势。研究得出的结论是,校园环境、学生参与以及学生对学校的学术和社会融入倾向于解释住在校园里与住在校外的影响。此外,学生在大学里的学术和社会融合对学习承诺、成功和防止学生辍学至关重要。该研究建议,未来的研究应侧重于居民与通勤状态对学位抱负、大学满意度和机构持久性等结果的直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hauntological engagements: Visual redress at Stellenbosch University Cyberbullying in Kenyan universities: Lessons and insights from the personal experience of deans of students Postgraduate psychology students’ mental health and coping during COVID-19: Lessons learnt “Did ‘Step-Up’ help in stepping up?” Transition programmes as a factor to improve student academic performance Reflective perspectives of residence heads’ experiences and responses during COVID-19 at a Free State university, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1