Is semantic feature analysis effective when applied intensively? A randomized pilot study with non-fluent aphasic individuals

İbrahim Can Yaşa
{"title":"Is semantic feature analysis effective when applied intensively? A randomized pilot study with non-fluent aphasic individuals","authors":"İbrahim Can Yaşa","doi":"10.18621/eurj.1328853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In this study, it was investigated the effects of intensive aphasia treatment applied to individuals with non-fluent aphasia.\nMethods: Sixteen patients diagnosed with non-fluent aphasia were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. The therapy interventions were one day per week for the eight patients in the first group, for a total of 8 hours in 2 months (standard intervention). For the eight patients in the second group, therapy was applied for a total of 48 hours in 2 months, for one hour per day, six days a week, excluding Sundays (intensive intervention). Participants were tested using the Turkish aphasia test (ADD), Aphasia Impact Scale-21 (AIQ-21), and Boston Naming Test (BNT) before starting the treatment (pretest), after the treatment (posttest), and one month after the treatment ended (follow-up).\nResults: At the end of the treatments, a significant increase in ADD and BNT scores and a significant decrease in AIQ-21 scores were observed in both groups. Although there was a change in the follow-up test, the scores were still significantly different than the pretest scores. The rate of improvement in test scores of group II patients who received intensive aphasia treatment was superior to the group I patients. \nConclusion: Intensive application was superior to once-weekly aphasia treatment, and post-treatment improvement continued for at least one month after the treatments.","PeriodicalId":22571,"journal":{"name":"The European Research Journal","volume":"65 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1328853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, it was investigated the effects of intensive aphasia treatment applied to individuals with non-fluent aphasia. Methods: Sixteen patients diagnosed with non-fluent aphasia were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. The therapy interventions were one day per week for the eight patients in the first group, for a total of 8 hours in 2 months (standard intervention). For the eight patients in the second group, therapy was applied for a total of 48 hours in 2 months, for one hour per day, six days a week, excluding Sundays (intensive intervention). Participants were tested using the Turkish aphasia test (ADD), Aphasia Impact Scale-21 (AIQ-21), and Boston Naming Test (BNT) before starting the treatment (pretest), after the treatment (posttest), and one month after the treatment ended (follow-up). Results: At the end of the treatments, a significant increase in ADD and BNT scores and a significant decrease in AIQ-21 scores were observed in both groups. Although there was a change in the follow-up test, the scores were still significantly different than the pretest scores. The rate of improvement in test scores of group II patients who received intensive aphasia treatment was superior to the group I patients. Conclusion: Intensive application was superior to once-weekly aphasia treatment, and post-treatment improvement continued for at least one month after the treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语义特征分析在集中应用时是否有效?一项针对非流利失语症患者的随机先导研究
目的:探讨强化失语治疗对非流利性失语患者的治疗效果。方法:将16例确诊为非流利性失语的患者随机分为两组。第一组8例患者的治疗干预为每周1天,2个月共8小时(标准干预)。第二组8例患者,治疗时间为2个月共48小时,每天1小时,每周6天,周日除外(强化干预)。参与者在开始治疗前(前测)、治疗后(后测)和治疗结束一个月后(随访)分别使用土耳其失语症测试(ADD)、失语症影响量表-21 (AIQ-21)和波士顿命名测试(BNT)进行测试。结果:治疗结束时,两组患者的ADD、BNT评分均显著升高,AIQ-21评分均显著降低。虽然在后续测试中有变化,但得分仍与前测得分有显著差异。II组患者接受强化失语症治疗后测试成绩的改善率优于I组患者。结论:强化应用优于每周一次的失语症治疗,治疗后改善持续至少一个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy: comparison of visual outcomes, graft survival rates, and complications Eisenmenger syndrome presenting with chronic thromboembolic disease Exploring menopausal dynamics: a cross-sectional analysis of age, symptomatology, and sociodemographic influences in a developing population of women aged 40-60 Rheumatology nurses’ knowledge and practices on pain management Relationship between fortilin levels and coronary ischemia in heart failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1