Daily patient geometry correction: application of NAL and eNAL protocols

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.2478/pjmpe-2020-0021
A. Dabrowski, Sylwia Zielińska-Dąbrowska, T. Kuszewski, K. Lis
{"title":"Daily patient geometry correction: application of NAL and eNAL protocols","authors":"A. Dabrowski, Sylwia Zielińska-Dąbrowska, T. Kuszewski, K. Lis","doi":"10.2478/pjmpe-2020-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: To test the NAL and eNAL correction protocols using daily patient setup displacements. Methods and material: In total, the analysis was performed for 749 and 797 kV CBCT images for gynecological and prostate patients, respectively, each of 30 patients. After the planning procedure, patients were set up on the treatment table in the treatment position every day. The on-line correction protocol was applied. KV CBCT images were acquired by means of x-ray lamp mounted orthogonally on Linac. Patient setup displacement was assigned. NAL and eNAL corrections protocols were simulated using daily data from online corrections for these two groups of patients. The overall systematic error and random error were calculated for each direction. Results: For the prostate group, the random errors for daily Raw data (no correction) in LAT, LONG, and VERT directions were 2.0 mm, 1.6 mm, and 3.2 mm, respectively. For NAL and eNAL protocols, they were in the range of 1.8 mm to 3.2 mm. For the gynecological group, the random errors were: for daily Raw data 2.2 mm, 1.7 mm, and 3.2 mm, respectively. For NAL and eNAL protocols, they were in the range of 2.0 to 3.4 mm. For the prostate group, values of systematic errors 1.8 mm, 1.8 mm, and 3.3 mm, respectively for Raw data. For NAL and eNAL protocols, these values were less than 1.8 mm. For the gynecological group, the systematic errors were 2.6 mm, 2.3 mm, and 2.8 mm, respectively, for Raw data. For NAL ana eNAL protocols less than 1.8 mm. For the gynecological group, for Raw data, 45% of the total displacement vectors exceeded 5 mm, whereas only 25% did after the NAL procedure and 29% after the eNAL procedure. For the prostate group, for Raw data, 34% of the total displacement vectors exceeded 5 mm, whereas only 22% did after NAL procedure and 28% after eNAL procedure Conclusions: For gynecological and prostate cancer patients, the NAL and eNAL correction protocols can be safely applied to substantially reduce setup errors.","PeriodicalId":53955,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2020-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: To test the NAL and eNAL correction protocols using daily patient setup displacements. Methods and material: In total, the analysis was performed for 749 and 797 kV CBCT images for gynecological and prostate patients, respectively, each of 30 patients. After the planning procedure, patients were set up on the treatment table in the treatment position every day. The on-line correction protocol was applied. KV CBCT images were acquired by means of x-ray lamp mounted orthogonally on Linac. Patient setup displacement was assigned. NAL and eNAL corrections protocols were simulated using daily data from online corrections for these two groups of patients. The overall systematic error and random error were calculated for each direction. Results: For the prostate group, the random errors for daily Raw data (no correction) in LAT, LONG, and VERT directions were 2.0 mm, 1.6 mm, and 3.2 mm, respectively. For NAL and eNAL protocols, they were in the range of 1.8 mm to 3.2 mm. For the gynecological group, the random errors were: for daily Raw data 2.2 mm, 1.7 mm, and 3.2 mm, respectively. For NAL and eNAL protocols, they were in the range of 2.0 to 3.4 mm. For the prostate group, values of systematic errors 1.8 mm, 1.8 mm, and 3.3 mm, respectively for Raw data. For NAL and eNAL protocols, these values were less than 1.8 mm. For the gynecological group, the systematic errors were 2.6 mm, 2.3 mm, and 2.8 mm, respectively, for Raw data. For NAL ana eNAL protocols less than 1.8 mm. For the gynecological group, for Raw data, 45% of the total displacement vectors exceeded 5 mm, whereas only 25% did after the NAL procedure and 29% after the eNAL procedure. For the prostate group, for Raw data, 34% of the total displacement vectors exceeded 5 mm, whereas only 22% did after NAL procedure and 28% after eNAL procedure Conclusions: For gynecological and prostate cancer patients, the NAL and eNAL correction protocols can be safely applied to substantially reduce setup errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每日患者几何校正:NAL和eNAL方案的应用
目的:测试NAL和eNAL矫正方案使用每日患者设置位移。方法和材料:共分析妇科和前列腺患者的CBCT图像749和797 kV,每30例。计划程序完成后,每天将患者按治疗体位置于治疗台上。采用在线校正方案。通过将x射线灯垂直安装在Linac上获取KV CBCT图像。分配患者装置移位。NAL和eNAL校正方案使用来自这两组患者在线校正的每日数据进行模拟。计算了各方向的总体系统误差和随机误差。结果:前列腺组LAT、LONG、VERT方向每日原始数据(未校正)随机误差分别为2.0 mm、1.6 mm、3.2 mm。对于NAL和eNAL协议,它们在1.8 mm到3.2 mm的范围内。对于妇科组,随机误差为:每日原始数据分别为2.2 mm, 1.7 mm和3.2 mm。NAL和eNAL方案在2.0 ~ 3.4 mm范围内。对于前列腺组,原始数据的系统误差值分别为1.8 mm、1.8 mm和3.3 mm。对于NAL和eNAL协议,这些值小于1.8 mm。对于妇科组,原始数据的系统误差分别为2.6 mm、2.3 mm和2.8 mm。NAL和eNAL协议小于1.8 mm。对于妇科组,根据原始数据,45%的总位移矢量超过5mm,而NAL手术后只有25%,eNAL手术后只有29%。对于前列腺组,根据原始数据,34%的总位移矢量超过5mm,而NAL手术后只有22%,eNAL手术后只有28%。结论:对于妇科和前列腺癌患者,NAL和eNAL矫正方案可以安全地应用,大大减少设置误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering
Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering (PJMPE) (Online ISSN: 1898-0309; Print ISSN: 1425-4689) is an official publication of the Polish Society of Medical Physics. It is a peer-reviewed, open access scientific journal with no publication fees. The issues are published quarterly online. The Journal publishes original contribution in medical physics and biomedical engineering.
期刊最新文献
Parametrization of subsegmental infarcts using high spatial resolution 2DSTE and synthetic ultrasonic data Automated differential diagnostics of respiratory diseases using an electronic stethoscope Evaluating the impact of anatomical changes on dose distributions in head and neck cancer Comparing eDQE and eNEQ metrics – is there an alternative approach to assessing image quality in digital mammography? Vascular stiffness in cold pressor test hyper-reactors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1