[How to Defend Mandatory Immunization Against Vaccine Hesitancy and Vaccine Refusal? An Ethical Assessment].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Mikrobiyoloji bulteni Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5578/mb.20239913
M Murat Civaner
{"title":"[How to Defend Mandatory Immunization Against Vaccine Hesitancy and Vaccine Refusal? An Ethical Assessment].","authors":"M Murat Civaner","doi":"10.5578/mb.20239913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the basic ethical principles in medical practice is to respect personal autonomy. However, it is a widely accepted view that when it comes to health problems that concern not only the individual but also the society, especially in epidemics of infectious diseases, individual autonomy can be violated by prioritizing the benefit of the community. This view is based on the scientific fact that epidemics can only be controlled by immunizing all susceptible individuals. However, whether all susceptible individuals can be compelled to be immunized remains a matter of debate around the world. Especially in the last three years, during the worldwide Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a significant part of the society has been hesitant about being vaccinated, and some have argued that vaccines should be rejected altogether. In the face of the situation outlined above, the question of \"should immunization be mandatory?\" has become more important than ever to be able to answer the question in a way that will ensure as broad consensus as possible. In this review article; it was discussed under which conditions mandatory immunization could be justified in terms of ethics and thus, it was aimed to contribute to the solution of the vital problem created by the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy and rejection in terms of public health. To this aim, first of all, the need to clarify some concepts was mentioned. Afterwards, the arguments \"must be compulsory\", \"should be optional\", and \"should not be done to anyone\" were evaluated with their justifications and it was determined that the argument that immunization should be mandatory could be justified in terms of ethics. In the article, it was argued that the conflicts of \"individual freedom X community benefit\" and \"personal autonomy X community benefit\" did not exist in today's actual conditions, but it was stated that an individual with the knowledge of reality experiences a tension in the face of not putting this knowledge into practice. It was emphasized that in order to overcome this tension, consolidation of the theoretical background and also consideration of the macro determinants of vaccine hesitancy and rejection in practice were necessary. What needs to be done to re-establish trust in the medical institution was listed, and it was argued that the question of how to implement mandatory immunization could only be answered in a healthy way through a transformation process that will be implemented through a social dialogue.</p>","PeriodicalId":18509,"journal":{"name":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","volume":"57 1","pages":"156-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.20239913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the basic ethical principles in medical practice is to respect personal autonomy. However, it is a widely accepted view that when it comes to health problems that concern not only the individual but also the society, especially in epidemics of infectious diseases, individual autonomy can be violated by prioritizing the benefit of the community. This view is based on the scientific fact that epidemics can only be controlled by immunizing all susceptible individuals. However, whether all susceptible individuals can be compelled to be immunized remains a matter of debate around the world. Especially in the last three years, during the worldwide Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a significant part of the society has been hesitant about being vaccinated, and some have argued that vaccines should be rejected altogether. In the face of the situation outlined above, the question of "should immunization be mandatory?" has become more important than ever to be able to answer the question in a way that will ensure as broad consensus as possible. In this review article; it was discussed under which conditions mandatory immunization could be justified in terms of ethics and thus, it was aimed to contribute to the solution of the vital problem created by the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy and rejection in terms of public health. To this aim, first of all, the need to clarify some concepts was mentioned. Afterwards, the arguments "must be compulsory", "should be optional", and "should not be done to anyone" were evaluated with their justifications and it was determined that the argument that immunization should be mandatory could be justified in terms of ethics. In the article, it was argued that the conflicts of "individual freedom X community benefit" and "personal autonomy X community benefit" did not exist in today's actual conditions, but it was stated that an individual with the knowledge of reality experiences a tension in the face of not putting this knowledge into practice. It was emphasized that in order to overcome this tension, consolidation of the theoretical background and also consideration of the macro determinants of vaccine hesitancy and rejection in practice were necessary. What needs to be done to re-establish trust in the medical institution was listed, and it was argued that the question of how to implement mandatory immunization could only be answered in a healthy way through a transformation process that will be implemented through a social dialogue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何防范疫苗犹豫和拒绝接种?道德评估]。
尊重个人自主权是医疗实践的基本伦理原则之一。然而,人们普遍认为,在涉及不仅涉及个人而且涉及社会的健康问题时,特别是在传染病流行方面,个人的自主权可能因优先考虑社区的利益而受到侵犯。这一观点基于这样一个科学事实,即只有通过对所有易感个体进行免疫才能控制流行病。然而,是否可以强迫所有易感个体接种疫苗仍然是世界各地争论的问题。特别是在最近三年,在全球范围内的冠状病毒病-2019 (COVID-19)大流行期间,社会上很大一部分人对接种疫苗犹豫不决,有些人认为应该完全拒绝接种疫苗。面对上述情况,“免疫接种是否应该是强制性的?”的问题变得比以往任何时候都更加重要,以便能够以确保尽可能广泛协商一致的方式回答这个问题。在这篇综述文章中;会议讨论了在何种条件下可以从道德角度证明强制免疫是合理的,因此,会议的目的是促进解决在公共卫生方面由于疫苗犹豫和拒绝现象所造成的重大问题。为此,首先提出了澄清一些概念的必要性。之后,对“必须是强制性的”、“应该是可选的”和“不应该对任何人这样做”的论点进行了评价,并给出了它们的理由,确定从伦理角度来看,强制性免疫的论点是合理的。文章认为,“个人自由X社区利益”和“个人自治X社区利益”的冲突在今天的实际条件下并不存在,但它指出,一个拥有现实知识的个人在面对不将这种知识付诸实践时会感到紧张。有人强调,为了克服这种紧张关系,有必要巩固理论背景,并在实践中考虑疫苗犹豫和排斥的宏观决定因素。会上列出了为重新建立对医疗机构的信任需要做些什么,与会者认为,如何实施强制性免疫接种的问题只能通过社会对话实施的转型进程以一种健康的方式得到回答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Microbiology is the scientific official publication of Ankara Microbiology Society. It is published quarterly in January, April, July and October. The aim of Bulletin of Microbiology is to publish high quality scientific research articles on the subjects of medical and clinical microbiology. In addition, review articles, short communications and reports, case reports, editorials, letters to editor and other training-oriented scientific materials are also accepted. Publishing language is Turkish with a comprehensive English abstract. The editorial policy of the journal is based on independent, unbiased, and double-blinded peer-review. Specialists of medical and/or clinical microbiology, infectious disease and public health, and clinicians and researchers who are training and interesting with those subjects, are the target groups of Bulletin of Microbiology.
期刊最新文献
[An Endemic Disease in the Black Sea Region: Leptospirosis]. [Can Coronavirus HCoV-229E be Used as a Model Virus Instead of SARS-CoV-2 in Antiviral Efficacy Studies?] [Effects of Efflux Pump Inhibitors and Antileishmanial Drug Combinations on Leishmania tropica and Leishmania infantum Isolates]. [Effects of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Applied to Cancer Patients on MRSA and VRE Colonization: A Cross-Over Design Study]. [Investigation of Molecular Differences in Plasmodium spp. Isolates Obtained from Malaria Patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1