Comparing the Efficacy and Success Rate of Radial Artery Approach under Ultrasound Guidance and Palpation Technique for Coronary Intervention at Central Chest Institute of Thailand

{"title":"Comparing the Efficacy and Success Rate of Radial Artery Approach under Ultrasound Guidance and Palpation Technique for Coronary Intervention at Central Chest Institute of Thailand","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.03.13807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Previous studies of ultrasound guidance for transradial artery access during coronary angiography or interventional procedures demonstrate improving success rate, number of attempts, and short-time access in radial artery cannulation.\n\nObjective: To compare the benefit of ultrasound guidance radial artery access during coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpation technique in experienced and inexperienced operators.\n\nMaterials and Methods: A randomized prospective study was performed between October 2021 and April 2022. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomized into three groups. The first group, group I (55 cases), underwent radial artery puncture with ultrasound guidance by an experienced interventionist. The second group, group II (56 cases), underwent radial artery puncture using the palpation technique by another experienced interventionist. The third group, group III (53 cases), was also assigned to radial artery puncture with the palpation technique, however, performed by three interventional cardiology fellows.\n\nResults: The success rate of radial cannulation was 55 (100%) in group I, 52 (92.9%) in group II, and 48 (90.6%) in group III (p=0.060). Firstattempt success rates in the three groups were 83.6%, 75%, and 69.8%, respectively (p=0.233). The median number of attempts was not significantly different (p=0.208). Time to access the radial artery in group I was reduced significantly compared to the palpation technique in group II and group III (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in complications such as difficult access, access site crossover, radial spasm, and hematoma/ bleeding complication (p=0.135, 0.367, 0.132, and 0.700, respectively).\n\nConclusion: In experienced operators, an ultrasound-guided technique has been shown to have beneficial advantages in reducing the time to access radial artery cannulation compared to experienced and inexperienced operators using the palpation technique.\n\nKeywords: Transradial catheterization; Ultrasound guide","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.03.13807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies of ultrasound guidance for transradial artery access during coronary angiography or interventional procedures demonstrate improving success rate, number of attempts, and short-time access in radial artery cannulation. Objective: To compare the benefit of ultrasound guidance radial artery access during coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with palpation technique in experienced and inexperienced operators. Materials and Methods: A randomized prospective study was performed between October 2021 and April 2022. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomized into three groups. The first group, group I (55 cases), underwent radial artery puncture with ultrasound guidance by an experienced interventionist. The second group, group II (56 cases), underwent radial artery puncture using the palpation technique by another experienced interventionist. The third group, group III (53 cases), was also assigned to radial artery puncture with the palpation technique, however, performed by three interventional cardiology fellows. Results: The success rate of radial cannulation was 55 (100%) in group I, 52 (92.9%) in group II, and 48 (90.6%) in group III (p=0.060). Firstattempt success rates in the three groups were 83.6%, 75%, and 69.8%, respectively (p=0.233). The median number of attempts was not significantly different (p=0.208). Time to access the radial artery in group I was reduced significantly compared to the palpation technique in group II and group III (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in complications such as difficult access, access site crossover, radial spasm, and hematoma/ bleeding complication (p=0.135, 0.367, 0.132, and 0.700, respectively). Conclusion: In experienced operators, an ultrasound-guided technique has been shown to have beneficial advantages in reducing the time to access radial artery cannulation compared to experienced and inexperienced operators using the palpation technique. Keywords: Transradial catheterization; Ultrasound guide
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国中央胸科研究所超声引导下桡动脉入路与触诊技术在冠状动脉介入治疗中的疗效及成功率比较
背景:在冠状动脉造影或介入手术中,超声引导经桡动脉插管的研究表明,桡动脉插管的成功率、次数和时间都有所提高。目的:比较超声引导桡动脉进入冠状动脉造影(CAG)或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与触诊技术在经验丰富和经验不足的操作人员中的优势。材料和方法:一项随机前瞻性研究于2021年10月至2022年4月进行。164名患者被随机分为三组。第一组55例,由经验丰富的介入医师在超声引导下行桡动脉穿刺。第二组(56例)由另一位经验丰富的介入医师采用触诊技术穿刺桡动脉。第三组,III组(53例),也被分配到用触诊技术进行桡动脉穿刺,然而,由三位介入心脏病学研究员执行。结果:ⅰ组桡动脉插管成功率为55例(100%),ⅱ组为52例(92.9%),ⅲ组为48例(90.6%)(p=0.060)。三组患者首次尝试成功率分别为83.6%、75%、69.8% (p=0.233)。尝试次数中位数差异无统计学意义(p=0.208)。与II组和III组的触诊技术相比,I组到达桡动脉的时间明显缩短(p<0.001)。两组患者通路困难、通路交叉、桡骨痉挛、血肿出血等并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(p值分别为0.135、0.367、0.132、0.700)。结论:在经验丰富的操作人员中,与经验丰富和经验不足的操作人员使用触诊技术相比,超声引导技术在减少桡动脉插管时间方面具有有益的优势。关键词:经桡动脉置管;超声引导
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1