Learning buffer solution based on virtual lab in senior high school

Gulmah Sugiharti, Aldhi Kurnia
{"title":"Learning buffer solution based on virtual lab in senior high school","authors":"Gulmah Sugiharti, Aldhi Kurnia","doi":"10.24114/JPKIM.V13I1.24144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine whether there is a difference between the use of virtual lab and real lab media in guided inquiry learning on learning outcomes in the buffer solution material. Both learning media are taught using the same learning model, namely the guided inquiry learning model. The samples in this study were class XI MIPA 3 as the experimental I which was taught with the guided inquiry learning model using virtual lab media and class XI MIPA 6 as the experimental II which was taught by guided inquiry learning model using real lab. The instrument used in this research was a test of learning outcomes chemistry of the buffer solution material. The data analysis technique for hypothesis testing was the two-party t-test statistic. The results of data processing showed that the experimental I had a pretest mean of 26.04 and a mean of posttest 79.53, while the experimental II had a mean pretest of 47.95 and a mean of posttest of 72.84. Hypothesis testing was carried out using two-party t test from the learning outcomes data and it was obtained tcount = 2.201 while ttable = 1.988 for α = 0.05 so that tcount> ttable. So Ha accept, that is, there are differences in student learning outcomes taught by guided inquiry models using virtual lab and real lab media. Meanwhile, the increase in student learning outcomes in guided inquiry classes using virtual labs was 72%, and those using real labs were 52%. Keywords: Virtual lab, Real lab, Guided inquiry, Buffer solutions","PeriodicalId":17697,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/JPKIM.V13I1.24144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether there is a difference between the use of virtual lab and real lab media in guided inquiry learning on learning outcomes in the buffer solution material. Both learning media are taught using the same learning model, namely the guided inquiry learning model. The samples in this study were class XI MIPA 3 as the experimental I which was taught with the guided inquiry learning model using virtual lab media and class XI MIPA 6 as the experimental II which was taught by guided inquiry learning model using real lab. The instrument used in this research was a test of learning outcomes chemistry of the buffer solution material. The data analysis technique for hypothesis testing was the two-party t-test statistic. The results of data processing showed that the experimental I had a pretest mean of 26.04 and a mean of posttest 79.53, while the experimental II had a mean pretest of 47.95 and a mean of posttest of 72.84. Hypothesis testing was carried out using two-party t test from the learning outcomes data and it was obtained tcount = 2.201 while ttable = 1.988 for α = 0.05 so that tcount> ttable. So Ha accept, that is, there are differences in student learning outcomes taught by guided inquiry models using virtual lab and real lab media. Meanwhile, the increase in student learning outcomes in guided inquiry classes using virtual labs was 72%, and those using real labs were 52%. Keywords: Virtual lab, Real lab, Guided inquiry, Buffer solutions
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于虚拟实验室的高中学习缓冲解决方案
本研究旨在确定在引导探究学习中使用虚拟实验室和真实实验室媒体对缓冲溶液材料的学习结果是否存在差异。两种学习媒介都采用相同的学习模式,即引导式探究学习模式。本研究使用的仪器是缓冲溶液材料的学习效果化学测试。假设检验的数据分析技术为两方t检验统计量。数据处理结果表明,实验I的前测均值为26.04,后测均值为79.53,而实验II的前测均值为47.95,后测均值为72.84。对学习成果资料采用双方t检验进行假设检验,得到tcount = 2.201, table = 1.988, α = 0.05, tcount> table。所以我接受,也就是说,使用虚拟实验室和真实实验室媒体的引导探究模式在学生学习成果上存在差异。与此同时,在使用虚拟实验室的引导探究课上,学生的学习成果提高了72%,而使用真实实验室的学生的学习成果提高了52%。关键词:虚拟实验室,真实实验室,引导探究,缓冲解决方案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formulation and antibacterial activity of frankincense sap extract deodorant spray (Styrax benzoin) Comparative assessment of human salivary α-amylase inhibitor from Indonesian herbs Self-efficacy assessment in chemistry learning: Development and validation using confirmatory factor analysis Preparing of chemical bonding learning media based android using smart apps creator program The evaluation of biochemistry practicum based on several parameters of laboratory services in chemistry department Universitas Negeri Surabaya during the even semester
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1