V. Voitsenya, A. F. Bardamid, A. Belyaeva, V. N. Bondarenko, G. De Temmerman, V. Konovalov, M. Lipa, A. Litnovsky, I. Ryzhkov, B. Schunke
{"title":"Interpretation of Tore Supra in-vessel mirror experiments","authors":"V. Voitsenya, A. F. Bardamid, A. Belyaeva, V. N. Bondarenko, G. De Temmerman, V. Konovalov, M. Lipa, A. Litnovsky, I. Ryzhkov, B. Schunke","doi":"10.1080/10519990701688025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the results of post-mortem analysis of mirror samples (molybdenum, stainless steel and copper) exposed for the 1 year experimental campaign inside the Tore Supra tokamak are presented. The mirrors were not protected during the experiment and therefore were exposed both to glow discharge conditioning of the vessel walls and to working discharges. After exposure, all samples were found to be eroded and at the same time were coated with a thin contaminating deposit. We pay attention to the fact, that the observed erosion cannot be described using the published sputtering yields. In particular, the difference between the erosion of stainless steel and copper exceeded a factor of 10 and the difference between the erosion of stainless steel and molybdenum was less than a factor of 2 in comparison with the corresponding factors of approximately 2.5 and apprximately 10 known from the literature. An attempt is made to correlate these observations with the different sticking coefficients of carbon on to different substrates.","PeriodicalId":54600,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Devices and Operations","volume":"9 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Devices and Operations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10519990701688025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
In this paper the results of post-mortem analysis of mirror samples (molybdenum, stainless steel and copper) exposed for the 1 year experimental campaign inside the Tore Supra tokamak are presented. The mirrors were not protected during the experiment and therefore were exposed both to glow discharge conditioning of the vessel walls and to working discharges. After exposure, all samples were found to be eroded and at the same time were coated with a thin contaminating deposit. We pay attention to the fact, that the observed erosion cannot be described using the published sputtering yields. In particular, the difference between the erosion of stainless steel and copper exceeded a factor of 10 and the difference between the erosion of stainless steel and molybdenum was less than a factor of 2 in comparison with the corresponding factors of approximately 2.5 and apprximately 10 known from the literature. An attempt is made to correlate these observations with the different sticking coefficients of carbon on to different substrates.
本文介绍了在托卡马克(Tore Supra tokamak)内进行了1年实验的镜面样品(钼、不锈钢和铜)的事后分析结果。在实验过程中,镜子没有受到保护,因此暴露在容器壁的辉光放电条件和工作放电中。暴露后,发现所有样品都被侵蚀,同时被一层薄薄的污染沉积物覆盖。我们注意到这样一个事实,即观察到的侵蚀不能用已公布的溅射产量来描述。特别是,不锈钢和铜之间的侵蚀差异超过10倍,不锈钢和钼之间的侵蚀差异小于2倍,而文献中已知的相应因素约为2.5倍和10倍。试图将这些观察结果与碳在不同基质上的不同粘附系数联系起来。