Muhammad Farhan Hawari, Karunia Haganta, Firas Arrasy
{"title":"‘It’s not God I’m joking about’: Religion, stand-up comedy, dark comedy, and public sphere","authors":"Muhammad Farhan Hawari, Karunia Haganta, Firas Arrasy","doi":"10.21107/sml.v5i2.16562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article tries to look at the social aspects of dark comedy used in stand-up comedy. Dark comedy is seen as problematic because it is in a vortex of humor, subjectivity, and the public. To capture and analyze these various phenomena, the authors use socio-anthropological perspective with the play theory from Sastramidjaja’s dissertation (2016) which is complemented by publicness from Sasono’s PhD theses (2019). This research is qualitative, using data collection methods in the form of semi-structured interviews with several main questions which are deepened by still referring to the main questions, especially to know the process of preparing jokes and stand-up comedy performances.This research was conducted in the Stand Up Indo Bekasi community and the Stand Up University Bhayangkara Jaya (UBJ) Bekasi with three comedians who often used dark joke material consisting of Bilal (Muslim), Ahmad (Muslim), and James (son of a Christian priest). This paper reveals the finding that dark comedy does not only come from the comedians, but also involves the public sphere as a form of grievances. The authors see that dark comedy is born from concerns that include comedian subjectivity in viewing various symbols – including religious symbols or those related to religion, reversing them, and contextualizing them in an incongruity.","PeriodicalId":33192,"journal":{"name":"Simulacra","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulacra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/sml.v5i2.16562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article tries to look at the social aspects of dark comedy used in stand-up comedy. Dark comedy is seen as problematic because it is in a vortex of humor, subjectivity, and the public. To capture and analyze these various phenomena, the authors use socio-anthropological perspective with the play theory from Sastramidjaja’s dissertation (2016) which is complemented by publicness from Sasono’s PhD theses (2019). This research is qualitative, using data collection methods in the form of semi-structured interviews with several main questions which are deepened by still referring to the main questions, especially to know the process of preparing jokes and stand-up comedy performances.This research was conducted in the Stand Up Indo Bekasi community and the Stand Up University Bhayangkara Jaya (UBJ) Bekasi with three comedians who often used dark joke material consisting of Bilal (Muslim), Ahmad (Muslim), and James (son of a Christian priest). This paper reveals the finding that dark comedy does not only come from the comedians, but also involves the public sphere as a form of grievances. The authors see that dark comedy is born from concerns that include comedian subjectivity in viewing various symbols – including religious symbols or those related to religion, reversing them, and contextualizing them in an incongruity.
这篇文章试图看看在单口喜剧中使用的黑色喜剧的社会方面。黑色喜剧被认为是有问题的,因为它处于幽默、主观性和公众的漩涡中。为了捕捉和分析这些不同的现象,作者将社会人类学的视角与Sastramidjaja的论文(2016)中的游戏理论结合起来,并辅以Sasono的博士论文(2019)的公共性。本研究是定性的,采用半结构化访谈形式的数据收集方法,主要涉及几个主要问题,这些主要问题通过仍然参考主要问题进行深化,特别是了解准备笑话和单口喜剧表演的过程。这项研究是在Stand Up Indo Bekasi社区和Stand Up University Bhayangkara Jaya (UBJ) Bekasi与三位喜剧演员一起进行的,他们经常使用黑色笑话材料,包括Bilal(穆斯林),Ahmad(穆斯林)和James(基督教牧师的儿子)。本文揭示了黑色喜剧不仅来自喜剧演员,也涉及到公共领域作为一种形式的不满。作者认为,黑色喜剧的诞生源于喜剧演员在看待各种符号时的主观性,包括宗教符号或与宗教有关的符号,将它们颠倒过来,并在不协调的情况下将它们置于背景中。