Diagnostic accuracy and management concordance of otorhinolaryngological diseases through telehealth or remote visits: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-14 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231156207
Sunny R Shah, Christopher C Munhall, Shaun A Nguyen, Ashli K O'Rourke, Kate Miccichi, Ted A Meyer
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy and management concordance of otorhinolaryngological diseases through telehealth or remote visits: A systematic review & meta-analysis.","authors":"Sunny R Shah, Christopher C Munhall, Shaun A Nguyen, Ashli K O'Rourke, Kate Miccichi, Ted A Meyer","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231156207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 has led to delays in providing healthcare in both emergency and non-emergency settings, especially in surgical subspecialties which rely heavily on referrals and in-person visits. Without an established telehealth infrastructure, many otorhinolaryngological departments experienced decreases in consultations. Telemedicine has attempted to bridge the gap between pre- and post-pandemic periods by creating a safe avenue of communication between otorhinolaryngologists and patients. This review hopes to address the accuracy of telemedicine in patient diagnosis and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted since study conception until June 30, 2022, on multiple databases including PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy, management accuracy, kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were meta-analyzed by comparing virtual visits to in-person visits (gold standard).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were included in this review. A total of 1518 patients were included across all studies. When comparing virtual visits against in-person visits, accurate diagnosis was made in 86.2% [82.1,89.9, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 73.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001] of patients and management accuracy was 91.5% [86.1,95.7, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 81.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001] when treating patients. Kappa value determining interrater reliability was 0.8 [0.7,0.9, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 81.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that diagnostic and management concordance is above 80% when comparing diagnosis and management strategies in patients who underwent both telehealth and in-person visits with an otorhinolaryngologist. In uncomplicated patients, telehealth might be a reliable source for diagnosis and management however, in-person consultation is likely still required for pathologies in which physical exam, imaging or procedural elements represent a vital component of the work-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1386-1397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231156207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 has led to delays in providing healthcare in both emergency and non-emergency settings, especially in surgical subspecialties which rely heavily on referrals and in-person visits. Without an established telehealth infrastructure, many otorhinolaryngological departments experienced decreases in consultations. Telemedicine has attempted to bridge the gap between pre- and post-pandemic periods by creating a safe avenue of communication between otorhinolaryngologists and patients. This review hopes to address the accuracy of telemedicine in patient diagnosis and management.

Methods: Searches were conducted since study conception until June 30, 2022, on multiple databases including PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy, management accuracy, kappa, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were meta-analyzed by comparing virtual visits to in-person visits (gold standard).

Results: Nineteen studies were included in this review. A total of 1518 patients were included across all studies. When comparing virtual visits against in-person visits, accurate diagnosis was made in 86.2% [82.1,89.9, I2 = 73.5%, P < 0.0001] of patients and management accuracy was 91.5% [86.1,95.7, I2 = 81.8%, P < 0.0001] when treating patients. Kappa value determining interrater reliability was 0.8 [0.7,0.9, I2 = 81.8%, P < 0.0001].

Conclusion: Our data suggest that diagnostic and management concordance is above 80% when comparing diagnosis and management strategies in patients who underwent both telehealth and in-person visits with an otorhinolaryngologist. In uncomplicated patients, telehealth might be a reliable source for diagnosis and management however, in-person consultation is likely still required for pathologies in which physical exam, imaging or procedural elements represent a vital component of the work-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过远程医疗或远程访问对耳鼻喉科疾病进行诊断的准确性和管理的一致性:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
导言:COVID-19 导致了急诊和非急诊医疗服务的延误,尤其是在严重依赖转诊和亲自就诊的外科亚专科。由于没有成熟的远程医疗基础设施,许多耳鼻喉科的会诊量都有所下降。远程医疗试图通过在耳鼻喉科医生和患者之间建立一个安全的沟通渠道来弥补大流行前后的差距。本综述希望探讨远程医疗在患者诊断和管理方面的准确性:从研究构想开始到 2022 年 6 月 30 日,我们在多个数据库(包括 PubMed、SCOPUS 和 CINAHL)上进行了检索,以开展本系统综述和荟萃分析。通过比较虚拟访问与亲自访问(金标准),对诊断准确性、管理准确性、kappa、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)进行了荟萃分析:本综述共纳入 19 项研究。所有研究共纳入 1518 名患者。在比较虚拟就诊与现场就诊时,86.2% [82.1,89.9, I2 = 73.5%, P I2 = 81.8%, P I2 = 81.8%, P 结论:我们的数据表明,虚拟就诊与现场就诊的诊断和治疗效果一致:我们的数据表明,在对接受远程医疗和耳鼻喉科医生面诊的患者的诊断和管理策略进行比较时,诊断和管理的一致性在 80% 以上。对于病情并不复杂的患者,远程医疗可能是诊断和管理的可靠来源,但对于体检、影像学或程序性检查是重要检查内容的病理情况,可能仍需要亲自就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Satisfaction with videoconference-delivered CBT provided as part of a blended treatment approach for children and adolescents with mental disorders and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic: A follow-up survey among caregivers and therapists. Ear Portal: An urban-based ear, nose, and throat, and audiology referral telehealth portal to improve access to specialist ear health services for children. The Congenital Cardiology Cloud: Proof of feasibility of Germany's first tele-medical network for pediatric cardiology. Care trajectories for patients utilizing electronic visits for COVID-like symptoms in a large healthcare delivery system: May 2020-December 2021. Knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of telepharmacy (KPR-TP) questionnaire among pharmacists: Development and psychometric evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1