Comparison of Attempts Needed for Veterinary Students to Reach Proficiency in a Basic and Advanced Robotic Simulator Task.

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of veterinary medical education Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-13 DOI:10.3138/jvme-2022-0130
Nicole J Buote, Boel Fransson, Mark Rishniw
{"title":"Comparison of Attempts Needed for Veterinary Students to Reach Proficiency in a Basic and Advanced Robotic Simulator Task.","authors":"Nicole J Buote, Boel Fransson, Mark Rishniw","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2022-0130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical training of students is one of the most difficult aspects of veterinary medical education. Competing interests of house officers, owners' wishes, and ethical concerns have led to increasing use of inanimate models for basic surgical skills training. Robotic simulators have benefits for psychomotor training but have not been previously investigated in veterinary medicine. Understanding the necessary practice time for new training devices is important when determining their potential value. The aim of this study was to compare the number of attempts needed for veterinary students to reach proficiency in both a basic and advanced robotic simulator task, and to assess the predictive nature of performance variables. Each student performed a basic and advanced tasks on the Mimic dV-Trainer™ until proficiency was reached. Students required a median of eight attempts (95% CI = 7-8, range: 6-11) to reach proficiency for the basic task versus 22 attempts (95% CI = 20-26, range: 11-62) for the advanced task. The median time required to complete training for the basic and advanced task was 13.5 minutes (range: 8-24 minutes) and 26.5 minutes (range: 11-82 minutes) respectively. The difference in task attempts supports the training protocol and confirms proficiency can be attained in a short period of time. The number of attempts to reach proficiency correlated with specific performance variables that can be used by educators to aid in training students on a robotic simulator. Continued investigations on robotic simulators should be performed to investigate their use in improving psychomotor skills in veterinary students.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"104-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2022-0130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical training of students is one of the most difficult aspects of veterinary medical education. Competing interests of house officers, owners' wishes, and ethical concerns have led to increasing use of inanimate models for basic surgical skills training. Robotic simulators have benefits for psychomotor training but have not been previously investigated in veterinary medicine. Understanding the necessary practice time for new training devices is important when determining their potential value. The aim of this study was to compare the number of attempts needed for veterinary students to reach proficiency in both a basic and advanced robotic simulator task, and to assess the predictive nature of performance variables. Each student performed a basic and advanced tasks on the Mimic dV-Trainer™ until proficiency was reached. Students required a median of eight attempts (95% CI = 7-8, range: 6-11) to reach proficiency for the basic task versus 22 attempts (95% CI = 20-26, range: 11-62) for the advanced task. The median time required to complete training for the basic and advanced task was 13.5 minutes (range: 8-24 minutes) and 26.5 minutes (range: 11-82 minutes) respectively. The difference in task attempts supports the training protocol and confirms proficiency can be attained in a short period of time. The number of attempts to reach proficiency correlated with specific performance variables that can be used by educators to aid in training students on a robotic simulator. Continued investigations on robotic simulators should be performed to investigate their use in improving psychomotor skills in veterinary students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较兽医专业学生在基本和高级机器人模拟器任务中达到熟练程度所需的尝试次数。
对学生进行外科手术培训是兽医教育中最困难的方面之一。由于医务人员的利益冲突、动物主人的意愿以及伦理方面的考虑,越来越多的人开始使用无生命模型进行基本外科技能培训。机器人模拟器对精神运动训练有好处,但以前在兽医学中还没有进行过研究。了解新训练设备所需的练习时间对于确定其潜在价值非常重要。本研究的目的是比较兽医专业学生熟练掌握基本和高级机器人模拟器任务所需的尝试次数,并评估性能变量的预测性。每位学生都在 Mimic dV-Trainer™ 上完成了基础和高级任务,直到达到熟练程度。学生完成基本任务所需的时间中位数为 8 次(95% CI = 7-8,范围:6-11),而完成高级任务所需的时间中位数为 22 次(95% CI = 20-26,范围:11-62)。完成基本任务和高级任务培训所需的时间中位数分别为 13.5 分钟(范围:8-24 分钟)和 26.5 分钟(范围:11-82 分钟)。任务尝试次数的差异支持了训练方案,并证实了可以在短时间内达到熟练程度。达到熟练程度的尝试次数与特定的性能变量相关,教育工作者可利用这些变量来帮助在机器人模拟器上对学生进行培训。应继续对机器人模拟器进行调查,研究其在提高兽医学生心理运动技能方面的用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of Intern Applications and its Relationship to Performance. AAVMC Notes. Cadaveric Prosections Prepared by Qualified Instructional Staff Were More Efficient and Effective Teaching Modalities for Veterinary Gross Anatomy than In-Class Dissections by Students. Thank You & Welcome! Veterinarian Use of and Sentiment Regarding Standard of Care for Feline Ovarian Pedicle Tie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1