Prevalence and causes of unreported needle stick injuries among health care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Reviews on Environmental Health Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1515/reveh-2021-0148
Razieh Behzadmehr, Abbas Balouchi, Mehran Hesaraki, Farshid Alazmani Noodeh, Hosein Rafiemanesh, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Fateme Behmaneshpour, Maliheh Rahdar, Majid Dastres, Shahaboddin Atharyan, Maryam Jahantigh, Frood Malekshahi
{"title":"Prevalence and causes of unreported needle stick injuries among health care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Razieh Behzadmehr,&nbsp;Abbas Balouchi,&nbsp;Mehran Hesaraki,&nbsp;Farshid Alazmani Noodeh,&nbsp;Hosein Rafiemanesh,&nbsp;Abdulqadir J Nashwan,&nbsp;Fateme Behmaneshpour,&nbsp;Maliheh Rahdar,&nbsp;Majid Dastres,&nbsp;Shahaboddin Atharyan,&nbsp;Maryam Jahantigh,&nbsp;Frood Malekshahi","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2021-0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to needle needles daily. Despite individual studies, there is no statistics on the prevalence of unreported needle stick injuries (NSIs) have been reported. This study was performed to determine the prevalence and causes of unreported NSIs among HCWs.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>In present systematic review and meta-analysis study, three international databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed) were searched from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2018. The random model was used to determine the prevalence of unreported needle stick among HCWs.</p><p><strong>Summary and outlook: </strong>Forty-one studies performed on 19,635 health care workers entered the final stage. Based-on random effect model, pooled prevalence of unreported needle stick injuries was 59.9% (95% CI: 52.0, 67.7; I2=98.9%). The most common cause of unreported NSIs was: They were not worried about NSIs (n=12). The high prevalence of unreported needle sticks injuries indicates the urgency and necessity of paying attention to strategies to improve reporting among health workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":"38 1","pages":"111-123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Health care workers (HCWs) are exposed to needle needles daily. Despite individual studies, there is no statistics on the prevalence of unreported needle stick injuries (NSIs) have been reported. This study was performed to determine the prevalence and causes of unreported NSIs among HCWs.

Content: In present systematic review and meta-analysis study, three international databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed) were searched from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2018. The random model was used to determine the prevalence of unreported needle stick among HCWs.

Summary and outlook: Forty-one studies performed on 19,635 health care workers entered the final stage. Based-on random effect model, pooled prevalence of unreported needle stick injuries was 59.9% (95% CI: 52.0, 67.7; I2=98.9%). The most common cause of unreported NSIs was: They were not worried about NSIs (n=12). The high prevalence of unreported needle sticks injuries indicates the urgency and necessity of paying attention to strategies to improve reporting among health workers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生保健工作者中未报告的针刺伤的患病率和原因:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:卫生保健工作者(HCWs)每天都暴露于针头。尽管有单独的研究,但没有关于未报告的针头刺伤(nsi)发生率的统计数据。本研究旨在确定卫生保健工作者中未报告的nsi的患病率和原因。内容:本系统综述和荟萃分析研究检索了Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed三个国际数据库,检索时间为2000年1月1日至2018年12月31日。采用随机模型确定卫生保健工作者中未报告的扎针率。总结与展望:对19635名卫生保健工作者进行的41项研究进入最后阶段。基于随机效应模型,未报告的针刺伤总发生率为59.9% (95% CI: 52.0, 67.7;I2 = 98.9%)。未报告的nsi最常见的原因是:他们不担心nsi (n=12)。未报告的针扎伤发生率很高,这表明迫切需要关注改善卫生工作者报告情况的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews on Environmental Health
Reviews on Environmental Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment. Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.
期刊最新文献
A structured review of the associations between breast cancer and exposures to selected organic solvents. Adapting to heat-health vulnerability in temperate climates: current adaptation and mitigation responses and future predictions in Aotearoa New Zealand. A systematic review and quality assessment of estimated daily intake of microplastics through food. Comprehensive approach to clinical decision-making strategy, illustrated by the Gulf War. A review of the potential adverse health impacts of atrazine in humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1