Dry eye in primary care: the relationship between digital display device usage and dry eye syndrome (DES) in medical students.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family practice Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmac155
Elif Sedanur Utlu, Mustafa Bayraktar, Bahadır Utlu
{"title":"Dry eye in primary care: the relationship between digital display device usage and dry eye syndrome (DES) in medical students.","authors":"Elif Sedanur Utlu, Mustafa Bayraktar, Bahadır Utlu","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmac155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As digital display devices become more and more indispensable, associated health problems have started to increase. We aimed to investigate the frequency and relationship of digital display device usage behaviours and dry eye syndrome (DES) in medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted on medical school students who voluntarily participated in our study online, about the duration and variety of their digital screen use, usage patterns, and protective measures, together with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Where necessary, the Schirmer-I, tear break-up time, and fluorescein staining tests were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 255 participants, 75.3% (n = 192) were female, 63.1% (n = 161) had no refractive vision defects, and 45.9% used smartphones for more than 5 h a day. According to the OSDI scores for DES screening, only 36.1% of the participants were normal, 17.3% had mild DES, 20.4% had moderate DES, and 26.3% had severe DES. A positive correlation was found between digital display usage time in hours per day and a high OSDI score. As the distance between the eye and the screen decreased, the DES score increased, which is significant for computer, e-book, and tablet use (P < 0.005). The DES rate of the 25 participants who underwent further evaluation was 40% for the tear break-up time test and 52% for the fluorescein staining test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high prevalence of DES due to digital screen use among medical school students highlights the importance of DES screening as a preventive measure in family medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"246-254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: As digital display devices become more and more indispensable, associated health problems have started to increase. We aimed to investigate the frequency and relationship of digital display device usage behaviours and dry eye syndrome (DES) in medical students.

Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted on medical school students who voluntarily participated in our study online, about the duration and variety of their digital screen use, usage patterns, and protective measures, together with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Where necessary, the Schirmer-I, tear break-up time, and fluorescein staining tests were carried out.

Results: Of the 255 participants, 75.3% (n = 192) were female, 63.1% (n = 161) had no refractive vision defects, and 45.9% used smartphones for more than 5 h a day. According to the OSDI scores for DES screening, only 36.1% of the participants were normal, 17.3% had mild DES, 20.4% had moderate DES, and 26.3% had severe DES. A positive correlation was found between digital display usage time in hours per day and a high OSDI score. As the distance between the eye and the screen decreased, the DES score increased, which is significant for computer, e-book, and tablet use (P < 0.005). The DES rate of the 25 participants who underwent further evaluation was 40% for the tear break-up time test and 52% for the fluorescein staining test.

Conclusion: The high prevalence of DES due to digital screen use among medical school students highlights the importance of DES screening as a preventive measure in family medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中的干眼症:医学生使用数字显示设备与干眼症(DES)之间的关系。
目的:随着数字显示设备变得越来越不可或缺,相关的健康问题也开始增多。我们旨在调查医学生使用数码显示设备的行为与干眼症(DES)的频率和关系:方法:我们对自愿在线参与研究的医学院学生进行了一项横断面观察研究,了解他们使用数字屏幕的时间和种类、使用模式和保护措施,并进行了眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷调查。必要时,还进行了施尔默-I、泪液破裂时间和荧光素染色测试:在255名参与者中,75.3%(n = 192)为女性,63.1%(n = 161)无屈光性视力缺陷,45.9%每天使用智能手机超过5小时。根据DES筛查的OSDI评分,只有36.1%的参与者视力正常,17.3%有轻度DES,20.4%有中度DES,26.3%有重度DES。研究发现,每天使用数字显示屏的时间(小时)与 OSDI 高分之间存在正相关。随着眼睛与屏幕之间距离的减少,DES 分数也随之增加,这对电脑、电子书和平板电脑的使用有显著影响(P < 0.005)。在接受进一步评估的 25 名参与者中,泪液破裂时间测试的 DES 发生率为 40%,荧光素染色测试的 DES 发生率为 52%:结论:医学院学生因使用数字屏幕而导致DES的高发病率凸显了DES筛查作为家庭医学预防措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Point-of-care ultrasound to assess left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure in unselected patients in primary care: a systematic review. School absence policy and healthcare use: a difference-in-difference cohort analysis. The effect and implementation of the COVID Box, a remote patient monitoring system for patients with a COVID-19 infection in primary care: a matched cohort study. Point-of-care ultrasonography for cardiovascular conditions in family practice: between risk and opportunity. Patient preferences for conservative treatment of shoulder pain: a discrete choice experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1