About the changing ways of writing in the field of social sciences

Oscar Steimberg, Marta Ines Merajver
{"title":"About the changing ways of writing in the field of social sciences","authors":"Oscar Steimberg, Marta Ines Merajver","doi":"10.1590/S0327-77122006000100006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a generalized acknowledgement of the crisis undergone by the textual world of poetics in scientific writing. Some of the strongest assumptions of this kind of prose, such as its natural condition of objectivity, have collapsed. In “the discourse of social science”, its frequent opacity can be descried; an opacity that was already visible from Barthes’ rebellious attitude in the 60s, when he denounced those who wanted “research to be shown but not written.” However, a look at the essays produced in our times tells us that we are still confronted with the sometimes tragic option of participating in or standing aside from the searches that involve the creation of a new subject of writing; in other words, we need to choose whether or not to cross the boundaries that mark the differences among discursive genres. Published in Sociedad. Social Science Journal of the School of Social Science at University of Buenos Aires, #23. Buenos Aires Argentina. Translated by Marta Ines Merajver Translation from Sociedad (Buenos Aires) no.22, ano 2004","PeriodicalId":87511,"journal":{"name":"Anales de la Sociedad de Puericultura de Buenos Aires","volume":"59 1","pages":"0-0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de la Sociedad de Puericultura de Buenos Aires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0327-77122006000100006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a generalized acknowledgement of the crisis undergone by the textual world of poetics in scientific writing. Some of the strongest assumptions of this kind of prose, such as its natural condition of objectivity, have collapsed. In “the discourse of social science”, its frequent opacity can be descried; an opacity that was already visible from Barthes’ rebellious attitude in the 60s, when he denounced those who wanted “research to be shown but not written.” However, a look at the essays produced in our times tells us that we are still confronted with the sometimes tragic option of participating in or standing aside from the searches that involve the creation of a new subject of writing; in other words, we need to choose whether or not to cross the boundaries that mark the differences among discursive genres. Published in Sociedad. Social Science Journal of the School of Social Science at University of Buenos Aires, #23. Buenos Aires Argentina. Translated by Marta Ines Merajver Translation from Sociedad (Buenos Aires) no.22, ano 2004
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于社会科学领域写作方式的变化
在科学写作中,诗学的文本世界所经历的危机已经得到了普遍的承认。这类散文的一些最强有力的假设,比如其客观的自然条件,已经崩溃了。在“社会科学话语”中,其频繁的不透明可以被描述;这种不透明在60年代巴特的叛逆态度中已经很明显了,当时他谴责那些想要“展示而不是写研究”的人。然而,看看我们这个时代产生的散文告诉我们,我们仍然面临着有时是悲剧性的选择,参与或站在一边,涉及到一个新的写作主题的创建搜索;换句话说,我们需要选择是否跨越标志着话语体裁差异的界限。发表于《社会》。《布宜诺斯艾利斯大学社会科学学院社会科学杂志》,第23期。阿根廷的布宜诺斯艾利斯。Marta Ines Merajver译自Sociedad (Buenos Aires) no。2004年11月22日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The loss of one's own The tragedy of development: disputes over natural resources in Argentina The inadmissible turned history the 1902 Law of Residence and the 1910 Law of Social Defense Matters of method Plastic surgeons: from beauty as a divine gift to Faustian imperatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1