Investigating discursive functions and potential cognitive demands of teacher questioning in the science classroom

Q2 Social Sciences Learning: Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/23735082.2019.1575458
Y. Soysal
{"title":"Investigating discursive functions and potential cognitive demands of teacher questioning in the science classroom","authors":"Y. Soysal","doi":"10.1080/23735082.2019.1575458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study presents an in-depth exploration of the types of discursive functions of teacher questioning and the potential cognitive correspondences embedded in the questioning. The participants were a science teacher and his class of 26 sixth-grade students who were engaged in an immersion science inquiry activity. The major data source was a video recording of the class that was analysed through systematic observation in two phases: coding and counting. Five higher-order categories (predicting, communicating, challenging, legitimising, and managing the discourse) and several sub-categories were abstracted for the discursive functions of teacher questioning. Particular discursive functions of teacher questioning attached to the specific potential cognitive demands embedded in the questioning are explored in detail according to the Bloomian taxonomy (i.e., predicting > understand; communicating > understand; challenging > evaluate; legitimising > evaluate; managing the discourse > analyse). From the data, recommendations were offered for science teachers, teacher educators, and the envisagement and implementation of professional development programmes centralising teacher questioning.","PeriodicalId":52244,"journal":{"name":"Learning: Research and Practice","volume":"52 2 1","pages":"167 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2019.1575458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents an in-depth exploration of the types of discursive functions of teacher questioning and the potential cognitive correspondences embedded in the questioning. The participants were a science teacher and his class of 26 sixth-grade students who were engaged in an immersion science inquiry activity. The major data source was a video recording of the class that was analysed through systematic observation in two phases: coding and counting. Five higher-order categories (predicting, communicating, challenging, legitimising, and managing the discourse) and several sub-categories were abstracted for the discursive functions of teacher questioning. Particular discursive functions of teacher questioning attached to the specific potential cognitive demands embedded in the questioning are explored in detail according to the Bloomian taxonomy (i.e., predicting > understand; communicating > understand; challenging > evaluate; legitimising > evaluate; managing the discourse > analyse). From the data, recommendations were offered for science teachers, teacher educators, and the envisagement and implementation of professional development programmes centralising teacher questioning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学课堂中教师提问的话语功能与潜在认知需求研究
摘要本研究深入探讨了教师提问的语篇功能类型以及隐含在提问中的潜在认知对应。参与者是一位科学老师和他的26名六年级学生,他们正在进行浸入式科学探究活动。主要数据来源是课堂录像,通过系统观察,分编码和计数两个阶段进行分析。五个高阶类别(预测、沟通、挑战、合法化和管理话语)和几个子类别被抽象为教师提问的话语功能。根据布卢姆分类法(即预测>理解;沟通>理解;挑战>评估;合法化>评价;管理话语>分析)。根据这些数据,为科学教师、教师教育工作者以及集中教师提问的专业发展计划的设想和实施提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning: Research and Practice
Learning: Research and Practice Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Speak like a pro: boosting language proficiency, engagement, and reducing anxiety, in virtual reality through innovative media transition with MondlyVR and VirtualSpeech Promoting pre-service teacher development through intervention-based action research Better learning and practice with teacher corrective feedback in higher education: a lesson from Thailand Factors influencing undergraduate students’ engagement in online learning: a PLS-SEM approach Learning journal 2.0: refinements for greater heights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1