ASSESING PROGRESSIVITY OF OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENDITURES FOR HEALTH CARE: EVIDENCE FROM HOUSEHOLDS IN MALAYSIA

Fakhri M.A.B., M. H. Juni, A. Rosliza
{"title":"ASSESING PROGRESSIVITY OF OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENDITURES FOR HEALTH CARE: EVIDENCE FROM HOUSEHOLDS IN MALAYSIA","authors":"Fakhri M.A.B., M. H. Juni, A. Rosliza","doi":"10.32827/ijphcs.6.3.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Out-of-pocket (OOP) payments is a principal means of financing health care throughout both developed and developing countries. Over-reliance on OOP payments may pose an undesirable effect from an equity perspective, where equity in financing is an important policy objective of the health care system. Objectives: To assess the progressivity of OOP payments for health care among Malaysian households. Methods: This paper used cross-sectional nationally representative data derived from the Malaysian Household Expenditure Survey (HES) 2014/15, which comprised of 14,473 households. Progressivity measures deviation from proportionality in the relation between OOP payments and ability to pay (ATP). This paper combined evidence from proportion approach, graphical measures (concentration curve) and summary indices (Gini coefficient, concentration index and Kakwani index) to demonstrate the progressivity of OOP health payments among Malaysian households. Result: More than two-third (77%) of Malaysian households surveyed reported to have made OOP health payments. The average shares of OOP payments from household consumption was 1.65% and was increasing across the household consumption quintiles. The OOP payments distribution was progressive demonstrated by all three approaches. The household consumption and burden of OOP payments was concentrated among the richer populations, with positive Gini coefficient and concentration index. The Kakwani index of OOP payments was 0.0910, indicates mildly progressive OOP payments in Malaysia. Conclusion: The OOP health payments in Malaysia has a progressive distribution. However, reducing progressivity trend should be monitored by the policymakers, and to decide further strategies on policy improvements pertaining to the country’s health financing. Keywords: Progressivity, Out-of-Pocket Expenditures, Health Care, Malaysia","PeriodicalId":14315,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32827/ijphcs.6.3.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Out-of-pocket (OOP) payments is a principal means of financing health care throughout both developed and developing countries. Over-reliance on OOP payments may pose an undesirable effect from an equity perspective, where equity in financing is an important policy objective of the health care system. Objectives: To assess the progressivity of OOP payments for health care among Malaysian households. Methods: This paper used cross-sectional nationally representative data derived from the Malaysian Household Expenditure Survey (HES) 2014/15, which comprised of 14,473 households. Progressivity measures deviation from proportionality in the relation between OOP payments and ability to pay (ATP). This paper combined evidence from proportion approach, graphical measures (concentration curve) and summary indices (Gini coefficient, concentration index and Kakwani index) to demonstrate the progressivity of OOP health payments among Malaysian households. Result: More than two-third (77%) of Malaysian households surveyed reported to have made OOP health payments. The average shares of OOP payments from household consumption was 1.65% and was increasing across the household consumption quintiles. The OOP payments distribution was progressive demonstrated by all three approaches. The household consumption and burden of OOP payments was concentrated among the richer populations, with positive Gini coefficient and concentration index. The Kakwani index of OOP payments was 0.0910, indicates mildly progressive OOP payments in Malaysia. Conclusion: The OOP health payments in Malaysia has a progressive distribution. However, reducing progressivity trend should be monitored by the policymakers, and to decide further strategies on policy improvements pertaining to the country’s health financing. Keywords: Progressivity, Out-of-Pocket Expenditures, Health Care, Malaysia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医疗保健自付支出的累进性:来自马来西亚家庭的证据
背景:自费支付是发达国家和发展中国家卫生保健筹资的主要手段。从公平的角度来看,过度依赖面向对象的支付可能会产生不良影响,因为公平融资是卫生保健系统的一个重要政策目标。目的:评估马来西亚家庭中面向对象的医疗保健支付的累进性。方法:本文使用了2014/15年马来西亚家庭支出调查(HES)中具有全国代表性的横断面数据,其中包括14,473个家庭。累进性衡量OOP付款与支付能力之间关系的比例偏差。本文结合了比例法、图形测量(集中曲线)和汇总指数(基尼系数、集中指数和Kakwani指数)的证据,以证明马来西亚家庭中OOP健康支付的累进性。结果:超过三分之二(77%)的马来西亚接受调查的家庭报告说,他们已经支付了面向对象的医疗费用。来自家庭消费的OOP支付的平均份额为1.65%,并且在家庭消费五分位数中不断增加。所有三种方法都证明了面向对象的支付分布是渐进的。家庭消费和缴费负担向较富裕人群集中,基尼系数和集中指数均为正。面向对象支付的Kakwani指数为0.0910,表明马来西亚的面向对象支付是温和渐进的。结论:马来西亚面向对象医疗支出呈递进分布。然而,决策者应监测累进率下降的趋势,并决定进一步改善国家卫生筹资政策的战略。关键词:累进,自付支出,医疗保健,马来西亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated with the Incidence of COVID-19: A Case Control Study in Tasikmalaya, Indonesia Proficiency, Psychological Wellbeing, and Coping of the College Freshmen of the University of Nueva Caceres Potential of Harum Manis Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) Seed Extract for Nosocomial Infections Stress and Burnout among Medical Workers in Indonesia: A Study during COVID-19 Pandemic Artificial Intelligence and Mental Health Issues: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1