Exploring lumbo-pelvic functional behaviour patterns during osteopathic motion tests: A biomechanical (en)active inference approach to movement analysis

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.05.001
Mathieu Ménard , Marien Couvertier , Lea Awai , Jorge E. Esteves , Benoit Bideau , Paul Vaucher
{"title":"Exploring lumbo-pelvic functional behaviour patterns during osteopathic motion tests: A biomechanical (en)active inference approach to movement analysis","authors":"Mathieu Ménard ,&nbsp;Marien Couvertier ,&nbsp;Lea Awai ,&nbsp;Jorge E. Esteves ,&nbsp;Benoit Bideau ,&nbsp;Paul Vaucher","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Observing how individuals actively adapt to their environment may provide additional insights into traditional clinical tests. Rather than using tests that only identify joint mobility limitations, it seems relevant to use clinical motion tests that assess global biomechanical functions more generally and identify functional behaviours.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study explores whether different functional kinematic behaviour patterns appear when executing a new complex motor task and whether those observations are consistent over multiple executions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Marker-based kinematic analyses of the lumbo-pelvic complex were conducted on 29 asymptomatic athletes during two active self-induced motion tests: the one-sided tilt test and a modified version of this test limiting the trunk axial rotation. Marker data served as an input for a full musculoskeletal model to compute the lumbar and lower limb joint angles. Latent class analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to identify different classes of functional kinematic behaviour and assess the reliability between measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The methodology allowed us to identify four distinctive classes of possible movement combinations based on these two functional tests: standard movement, low knee and lumbar engagement, high pelvis engagement and high lumbar flexion. All ICCs for the lumbo-pelvic complex degrees of freedom were higher than 0.6, suggesting a moderate to good reliability for the overall test.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It remains unknown whether the observed reproducible patterns emerging from the motion test relate to motivation and prior experiences. Further exploration is required to investigate whether these behaviours can be correlated to empirical clinical observations, past experiences, and future vulnerabilities for musculoskeletal conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068922000396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Observing how individuals actively adapt to their environment may provide additional insights into traditional clinical tests. Rather than using tests that only identify joint mobility limitations, it seems relevant to use clinical motion tests that assess global biomechanical functions more generally and identify functional behaviours.

Objectives

This study explores whether different functional kinematic behaviour patterns appear when executing a new complex motor task and whether those observations are consistent over multiple executions.

Methods

Marker-based kinematic analyses of the lumbo-pelvic complex were conducted on 29 asymptomatic athletes during two active self-induced motion tests: the one-sided tilt test and a modified version of this test limiting the trunk axial rotation. Marker data served as an input for a full musculoskeletal model to compute the lumbar and lower limb joint angles. Latent class analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to identify different classes of functional kinematic behaviour and assess the reliability between measurements.

Results

The methodology allowed us to identify four distinctive classes of possible movement combinations based on these two functional tests: standard movement, low knee and lumbar engagement, high pelvis engagement and high lumbar flexion. All ICCs for the lumbo-pelvic complex degrees of freedom were higher than 0.6, suggesting a moderate to good reliability for the overall test.

Conclusion

It remains unknown whether the observed reproducible patterns emerging from the motion test relate to motivation and prior experiences. Further exploration is required to investigate whether these behaviours can be correlated to empirical clinical observations, past experiences, and future vulnerabilities for musculoskeletal conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在骨科运动测试中探索腰盆腔功能行为模式:一种生物力学(en)主动推理方法来分析运动
背景观察个体如何积极适应环境可以为传统的临床试验提供额外的见解。与其使用仅识别关节活动受限的测试,不如使用更广泛地评估整体生物力学功能并识别功能行为的临床运动测试。目的:本研究探讨在执行新的复杂运动任务时是否会出现不同的功能运动学行为模式,以及这些观察结果在多次执行中是否一致。方法对29名无症状运动员进行两项主动自我诱导运动测试:单侧倾斜测试和限制躯干轴向旋转的改进版本的腰骨盆复合体进行基于标记的运动学分析。标记数据作为全肌肉骨骼模型的输入,用于计算腰椎和下肢关节角度。计算潜类分析和类内相关系数,以确定不同类别的功能运动学行为,并评估测量之间的可靠性。结果该方法允许我们根据这两项功能测试确定四种不同类型的可能的运动组合:标准运动、低膝关节和腰椎结合、高骨盆结合和高腰椎屈曲。腰盆腔复合自由度的所有icc均高于0.6,表明整体测试具有中等到良好的可靠性。结论从运动测试中观察到的重现模式是否与动机和先前经验有关尚不清楚。这些行为是否与经验性临床观察、过去的经验和未来对肌肉骨骼疾病的脆弱性相关,还需要进一步的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Osteopathic manual treatment in women with endometriosis: A scoping review on clinical symptoms, fertility and quality of life The effectiveness of neuromuscular spinal manipulation- an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Osteopathic treatment of a person with Arnold-Chiari malformation and Syringomyelia: A case report Is visceral osteopathy therapy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis Professional skill priorities: Comparison views of osteopathy industry professionals and osteopathy students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1