Outcomes of hospital admissions among frail older people: a 2-year cohort study

Eilís Keeble, H. Roberts, Christopher Williams, J. V. van Oppen, S. Conroy
{"title":"Outcomes of hospital admissions among frail older people: a 2-year cohort study","authors":"Eilís Keeble, H. Roberts, Christopher Williams, J. V. van Oppen, S. Conroy","doi":"10.3399/bjgp19X704621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background ‘Frailty crises’ are a common cause of hospital admission among older people and there is significant focus on admission avoidance. However, identifying frailty before a crisis occurs is challenging, making it difficult to effectively target community services. Better longer-term outcome data are needed if services are to reflect the needs of the growing population of older people with frailty. Aim To determine long-term outcomes of older people discharged from hospital following short (<72 hours) and longer hospital admissions compared by frailty status. Design and setting Two populations aged ≥70 years discharged from hospital units: those following short ‘ambulatory’ admissions (<72 hours) and those following longer inpatient stays. Method Data for 2-year mortality and hospital use were compared using frailty measures derived from clinical and hospital data. Results Mortality after 2 years was increased for frail compared with non-frail individuals in both cohorts. Patients in the ambulatory cohort classified as frail had increased mortality (Rockwood hazard ratio 2.3 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.5 to 3.4]) and hospital use (Rockwood rate ratio 2.1 [95% CI = 1.7 to 2.6]) compared with those patients classified as non-frail. Conclusion Individuals with frailty who are discharged from hospital experience increased mortality and resource use, even after short ‘ambulatory’ admissions. This is an easily identifiable group that is at increased risk of poor outcomes. Health and social care systems might wish to examine their current care response for frail older people discharged from hospital. There may be value in a ‘secondary prevention’ approach to frailty crises targeting individuals who are discharged from hospital.","PeriodicalId":22333,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of General Practice","volume":"56 1","pages":"e555 - e560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Background ‘Frailty crises’ are a common cause of hospital admission among older people and there is significant focus on admission avoidance. However, identifying frailty before a crisis occurs is challenging, making it difficult to effectively target community services. Better longer-term outcome data are needed if services are to reflect the needs of the growing population of older people with frailty. Aim To determine long-term outcomes of older people discharged from hospital following short (<72 hours) and longer hospital admissions compared by frailty status. Design and setting Two populations aged ≥70 years discharged from hospital units: those following short ‘ambulatory’ admissions (<72 hours) and those following longer inpatient stays. Method Data for 2-year mortality and hospital use were compared using frailty measures derived from clinical and hospital data. Results Mortality after 2 years was increased for frail compared with non-frail individuals in both cohorts. Patients in the ambulatory cohort classified as frail had increased mortality (Rockwood hazard ratio 2.3 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.5 to 3.4]) and hospital use (Rockwood rate ratio 2.1 [95% CI = 1.7 to 2.6]) compared with those patients classified as non-frail. Conclusion Individuals with frailty who are discharged from hospital experience increased mortality and resource use, even after short ‘ambulatory’ admissions. This is an easily identifiable group that is at increased risk of poor outcomes. Health and social care systems might wish to examine their current care response for frail older people discharged from hospital. There may be value in a ‘secondary prevention’ approach to frailty crises targeting individuals who are discharged from hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体弱老年人住院治疗的结果:一项为期2年的队列研究
背景:“虚弱危机”是老年人住院的常见原因,人们非常关注避免住院。然而,在危机发生之前确定脆弱性是具有挑战性的,因此难以有效地针对社区服务。如果服务要反映日益增长的体弱多病老年人的需求,就需要更好的长期结果数据。目的比较老年人在短时间(<72小时)和较长时间住院后的长期预后。设计和设定两组年龄≥70岁的出院人群:一组是短期“门诊”住院(<72小时),另一组是长期住院。方法采用来自临床和医院资料的衰弱指标,对2年死亡率和住院率进行比较。结果两组患者2年后体弱者的死亡率均高于非体弱者。与非虚弱的患者相比,被分类为虚弱的患者的死亡率(Rockwood风险比为2.3[95%可信区间{CI} = 1.5至3.4])和住院率(Rockwood风险比为2.1 [95% CI = 1.7至2.6])均有所增加。结论:即使在短暂的“门诊”住院后,出院的虚弱患者死亡率和资源利用率也会增加。这是一个容易识别的群体,其不良后果的风险增加。卫生和社会保健系统可能希望检查他们目前对出院的体弱老年人的护理反应。针对出院人员的虚弱危机采取“二级预防”方法可能有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: leading the fight in primary care Dealing with symptoms in the general population: lessons learned from the Danish Symptom Cohort Towards new definitions of avoidable hospital admissions Diagnosing myeloma in general practice: how might earlier diagnosis be achieved? General practice and the Medical Licensing Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1