Minority Representation and Reserved Legislative Seats in Romania

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES East European Politics and Societies Pub Date : 2012-08-01 DOI:10.1177/0888325412441493
R. King, Cosmin Marian
{"title":"Minority Representation and Reserved Legislative Seats in Romania","authors":"R. King, Cosmin Marian","doi":"10.1177/0888325412441493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately 32 nations currently use reservation of legislative seats for minority voices, whether by race, ethnicity, language, religion, or territory. Romania has among the most extensive and complicated arrangement of reserved seats, with 18 different ethnic minorities currently provided special parliamentary representation. This paper addresses two key political issues: how is it determined that there exists a valid ethnic minority deserving of recognition with a reserved seat? What are the political consequences from the broad allocation of reserved seats? The paper understands a reserved legislative seat as a distributive good over which rival claimants assert contested title. The state has incentive to avoid controversial choices although this is not always possible. Incumbent interests have incentive to restrict competitive entry without appearing to violate the principles of open inclusion. As seen through the Romanian case, the regime consequence from this dynamic tends to be clientele politics, in which minority organizations emerge segmented, dependent, and relatively powerless, yet simultaneously satisfied that they can guarantee by means of state subsidies the foundations for group identity.","PeriodicalId":47086,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics and Societies","volume":"15 1","pages":"561 - 588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325412441493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Approximately 32 nations currently use reservation of legislative seats for minority voices, whether by race, ethnicity, language, religion, or territory. Romania has among the most extensive and complicated arrangement of reserved seats, with 18 different ethnic minorities currently provided special parliamentary representation. This paper addresses two key political issues: how is it determined that there exists a valid ethnic minority deserving of recognition with a reserved seat? What are the political consequences from the broad allocation of reserved seats? The paper understands a reserved legislative seat as a distributive good over which rival claimants assert contested title. The state has incentive to avoid controversial choices although this is not always possible. Incumbent interests have incentive to restrict competitive entry without appearing to violate the principles of open inclusion. As seen through the Romanian case, the regime consequence from this dynamic tends to be clientele politics, in which minority organizations emerge segmented, dependent, and relatively powerless, yet simultaneously satisfied that they can guarantee by means of state subsidies the foundations for group identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马尼亚少数民族代表权和保留的立法席位
目前,大约有32个国家为少数民族保留立法席位,不论其种族、民族、语言、宗教或领土。罗马尼亚是保留席位安排最广泛和最复杂的国家之一,目前有18个不同的少数民族提供特别的议会代表。本文讨论了两个关键的政治问题:如何确定是否存在一个有效的少数民族,值得获得预留席位的承认?广泛分配预留席位的政治后果是什么?本文将保留的立法席位理解为一种可分配的利益,竞争对手对其主张有争议的所有权。政府有动机避免有争议的选择,尽管这并不总是可能的。既得利益者有动机在不违反开放包容原则的前提下限制竞争性进入。从罗马尼亚的例子中可以看出,这种动态导致的政权结果往往是附庸政治,在这种政治中,少数民族组织出现了分裂、依赖和相对无力的情况,但同时又满足于他们可以通过国家补贴来保证群体认同的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: East European Politics and Societies is an international journal that examines social, political, and economic issues in Eastern Europe. EEPS offers holistic coverage of the region - every country, from every discipline - ranging from detailed case studies through comparative analyses and theoretical issues. Contributors include not only western scholars but many from Eastern Europe itself. The Editorial Board is composed of a world-class panel of historians, political scientists, economists, and social scientists.
期刊最新文献
Expelled from the Fairytale: The Impact of the Dissident Legacy on Post-1989 Central European Politics Post-Dissident Politics and the “Liberal Consensus” in East-Central Europe after 1989 Václav Havel Posthumous Reclamation of a National Hero? An Arrested Dialectic: The National Past and (Post-)Dissident Catholic Moral Reasoning in Slovakia From Dissidence to Heroism: Constructing an Ideal Post-Communist Identity in the Czech Republic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1