Group-Based Medical Mistrust in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Asthma Living in Rural Areas.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-19 DOI:10.1177/15248399221150913
Sarah I Leonard, Connor T Pizii, Yihong Zhao, Amarilis Céspedes, Sharon Kingston, Jean-Marie Bruzzese
{"title":"Group-Based Medical Mistrust in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Asthma Living in Rural Areas.","authors":"Sarah I Leonard, Connor T Pizii, Yihong Zhao, Amarilis Céspedes, Sharon Kingston, Jean-Marie Bruzzese","doi":"10.1177/15248399221150913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black youth and rural adolescents are two groups who experience asthma disparities. Racism and discrimination in health care likely lead to group-based (systems-level) medical mistrust for some adolescents. Group-based medical mistrust, one pathway by which racism drives health inequities, is associated with poorer outcomes for patients with chronic conditions. Despite its potential importance in adolescent asthma, previous research has not considered group-based medical mistrust in this population. To fill this gap, we characterize group-based medical mistrust among rural adolescents with poorly controlled asthma, examining demographic differences. We analyzed baseline data from a school-based clinical trial in which 164 adolescents (mean age = 16.3; 76.2% Black) completed the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale (GBMMS). Using linear regression, we tested associations with race, gender, and age, controlling for recent medical visits and insurance status. The total GBMMS mean score was 2.3 (<i>SD</i> = 1.22); subscale scores ranged from 2.3 to 2.4. Black adolescents reported significantly higher total GBMMS scores (β = .45, <i>p</i> = .003) and significantly higher scores on two GBMMS subscales: suspicion of health care providers (β = .56, <i>p</i> = .007) and lack of support from health care providers (β = .36, <i>p</i> = .007). Gender and age were not associated with GBMMS scores. Health care providers need to consider medical mistrust and its role in their clinical care. Together with their institutions, health care providers and researchers should work toward changing systems that perpetuate racism to build trust as a means of reducing asthma disparities among adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399221150913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black youth and rural adolescents are two groups who experience asthma disparities. Racism and discrimination in health care likely lead to group-based (systems-level) medical mistrust for some adolescents. Group-based medical mistrust, one pathway by which racism drives health inequities, is associated with poorer outcomes for patients with chronic conditions. Despite its potential importance in adolescent asthma, previous research has not considered group-based medical mistrust in this population. To fill this gap, we characterize group-based medical mistrust among rural adolescents with poorly controlled asthma, examining demographic differences. We analyzed baseline data from a school-based clinical trial in which 164 adolescents (mean age = 16.3; 76.2% Black) completed the Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale (GBMMS). Using linear regression, we tested associations with race, gender, and age, controlling for recent medical visits and insurance status. The total GBMMS mean score was 2.3 (SD = 1.22); subscale scores ranged from 2.3 to 2.4. Black adolescents reported significantly higher total GBMMS scores (β = .45, p = .003) and significantly higher scores on two GBMMS subscales: suspicion of health care providers (β = .56, p = .007) and lack of support from health care providers (β = .36, p = .007). Gender and age were not associated with GBMMS scores. Health care providers need to consider medical mistrust and its role in their clinical care. Together with their institutions, health care providers and researchers should work toward changing systems that perpetuate racism to build trust as a means of reducing asthma disparities among adolescents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生活在农村地区、哮喘控制不佳的青少年对集体医疗的不信任。
黑人青少年和农村青少年是哮喘发病率较高的两个群体。医疗保健中的种族主义和歧视可能会导致一些青少年对基于群体(系统层面)的医疗不信任。基于群体的医疗不信任是种族主义导致医疗不公平的一个途径,它与慢性病患者较差的治疗效果有关。尽管它对青少年哮喘有潜在的重要影响,但以往的研究并未考虑过这一人群中基于群体的医疗不信任。为了填补这一空白,我们研究了哮喘控制不佳的农村青少年中基于群体的医疗不信任,并考察了人口统计学差异。我们分析了一项学校临床试验的基线数据,其中有 164 名青少年(平均年龄 = 16.3 岁;76.2% 为黑人)完成了团体医疗不信任量表(GBMMS)。我们使用线性回归法测试了与种族、性别和年龄的关系,并控制了最近的就诊情况和保险状况。GBMMS 总分平均值为 2.3(SD = 1.22);分量表得分介于 2.3 到 2.4 之间。黑人青少年的 GBMMS 总分明显更高(β = .45,p = .003),GBMMS 两个分量表的得分也明显更高:怀疑医疗服务提供者(β = .56,p = .007)和缺乏医疗服务提供者的支持(β = .36,p = .007)。性别和年龄与 GBMMS 分数无关。医疗服务提供者需要考虑医疗不信任及其在临床护理中的作用。医疗服务提供者和研究人员应与他们的机构一起,努力改变使种族主义长期存在的制度,以建立信任,从而减少青少年哮喘的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Public Health Agency and Utility Training Needs for CDC National Wastewater Surveillance System Jurisdictions in the United States. Formative Research to Design and Evaluate Caring Text Messages for American Indian and Alaska Native Youth, College Students, and Veterans. Group-Based Medical Mistrust in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Asthma Living in Rural Areas. "Did You Wash Your Hands?" The Socioeconomic Inequalities Preventing Youth From Adopting Protective Behaviors During COVID-19 in South Africa. Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Conduct a Collaborative Needs Assessment of Mental Health Service Users: Identifying Research Questions and Building Academic-Community Trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1