S. Bhushan, G. Burgreen, Joshua Bowman, I. Dettwiller, W. Brewer
{"title":"Predictions of Steady and Unsteady Flows using Machine-learned Surrogate Models","authors":"S. Bhushan, G. Burgreen, Joshua Bowman, I. Dettwiller, W. Brewer","doi":"10.1109/MLHPCAI4S51975.2020.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The applicability of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based design tools depend on the accuracy and complexity of the physical models, for example turbulence models, which remains an unsolved problem in physics, and rotor models that dictates the computational cost of rotorcraft and wind/hydro turbine farm simulations. The research focuses on investigation of the ability of neural networks to learn correlation between desired modeling variables and flow parameters, thereby providing surrogate models. For the turbulence modeling, the machine learned turbulence model is developed for unsteady boundary layer flow, and the predictions are validated against DNS data and compared with one-equation unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) predictions. The machine-learned model performs much better than the URANS model due to its ability to incorporate the non-linear correlation between turbulent stresses and rate-of-strain. The development of the surrogate rotor model builds on the hypothesis that if a model can mimic the axial and tangential momentum deficit generated by a blade resolved model, then it should produce a qualitatively and quantitatively similar wake recovery. An initial validation of the hypothesis was performed, which showed encouraging results.","PeriodicalId":47667,"journal":{"name":"Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning","volume":"67 1","pages":"80-87"},"PeriodicalIF":65.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MLHPCAI4S51975.2020.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The applicability of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based design tools depend on the accuracy and complexity of the physical models, for example turbulence models, which remains an unsolved problem in physics, and rotor models that dictates the computational cost of rotorcraft and wind/hydro turbine farm simulations. The research focuses on investigation of the ability of neural networks to learn correlation between desired modeling variables and flow parameters, thereby providing surrogate models. For the turbulence modeling, the machine learned turbulence model is developed for unsteady boundary layer flow, and the predictions are validated against DNS data and compared with one-equation unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) predictions. The machine-learned model performs much better than the URANS model due to its ability to incorporate the non-linear correlation between turbulent stresses and rate-of-strain. The development of the surrogate rotor model builds on the hypothesis that if a model can mimic the axial and tangential momentum deficit generated by a blade resolved model, then it should produce a qualitatively and quantitatively similar wake recovery. An initial validation of the hypothesis was performed, which showed encouraging results.
基于计算流体动力学(CFD)的设计工具的适用性取决于物理模型的准确性和复杂性,例如湍流模型,这是物理学中尚未解决的问题,以及旋翼飞机和风力/水力涡轮机模拟计算成本的旋翼模型。研究重点是研究神经网络学习所需建模变量与流量参数之间的相关性,从而提供替代模型的能力。在湍流建模方面,建立了非定常边界层湍流的机器学习模型,并通过DNS数据验证了预测结果,并与单方程非定常Reynolds average Navier-Stokes (URANS)预测结果进行了比较。机器学习模型比URANS模型表现得更好,因为它能够将湍流应力和应变率之间的非线性相关性纳入其中。代理转子模型的发展基于这样的假设:如果一个模型可以模拟叶片分解模型产生的轴向和切向动量赤字,那么它应该产生一个定性和定量相似的尾迹恢复。对该假设进行了初步验证,结果令人鼓舞。
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning comprises a monograph of at least 50 pages written by research leaders in the field. We aim to publish monographs that provide an in-depth, self-contained treatment of topics where there have been significant new developments. Typically, this means that the monographs we publish will contain a significant level of mathematical detail (to describe the central methods and/or theory for the topic at hand), and will not eschew these details by simply pointing to existing references. Literature surveys and original research papers do not fall within these aims.