Comparison of physical activity and sedentary behavior levels in secondary and university students

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING Rev Rene Pub Date : 2022-01-05 DOI:10.15253/2175-6783.20222371433
Natalie Naidoo, O. Olagbegi, T. Nadasan, Joshua Oluwafisayo Afolabi
{"title":"Comparison of physical activity and sedentary behavior levels in secondary and university students","authors":"Natalie Naidoo, O. Olagbegi, T. Nadasan, Joshua Oluwafisayo Afolabi","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.20222371433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to compare physical activity and sedentary behavior in university students and secondary students. Methods: the cross-sectional study involved 202 selected secondary students and 171 university students. The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire was administered to the respondents. Percentages, chi-square test, Mann Whitney U test and linear regression were used for data analysis. Results: about 63% and 32% of secondary and university students, respectively, reported high levels of physical activity, while 84.7% and 71.9% of secondary and undergraduate students, respectively, met guidelines for sedentary behavior. The secondary students had significantly higher scores than the university students in vigorous (p=0.004), moderate (p<0.001), and total physical activity (p<0.001). The observed difference was more prominent among females. Conclusion: secondary students had higher scores of physical activity and spent less time in sedentary behavior.","PeriodicalId":45440,"journal":{"name":"Rev Rene","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev Rene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222371433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to compare physical activity and sedentary behavior in university students and secondary students. Methods: the cross-sectional study involved 202 selected secondary students and 171 university students. The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire was administered to the respondents. Percentages, chi-square test, Mann Whitney U test and linear regression were used for data analysis. Results: about 63% and 32% of secondary and university students, respectively, reported high levels of physical activity, while 84.7% and 71.9% of secondary and undergraduate students, respectively, met guidelines for sedentary behavior. The secondary students had significantly higher scores than the university students in vigorous (p=0.004), moderate (p<0.001), and total physical activity (p<0.001). The observed difference was more prominent among females. Conclusion: secondary students had higher scores of physical activity and spent less time in sedentary behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中学生和大学生体育活动和久坐行为水平的比较
目的:比较大学生和中学生的身体活动和久坐行为。方法:选取202名中学生和171名大学生进行横断面研究。对受访者进行了全球身体活动问卷调查。数据分析采用百分比法、卡方检验、Mann Whitney U检验和线性回归。结果:分别有63%和32%的中学生和大学生报告了高水平的体育活动,而84.7%和71.9%的中学生和大学生分别符合久坐行为的指南。中学生在剧烈运动(p=0.004)、中度运动(p<0.001)和总运动(p<0.001)方面得分显著高于大学生。观察到的差异在女性中更为明显。结论:中学生体力活动得分较高,久坐时间较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rev Rene
Rev Rene NURSING-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Shift work disorder among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia Mortality from HIV/AIDS in adolescents and young adults: a temporal time series University Open to Older People: factors associated with the use of information and communication technologies Sleep quality and burnout in higher education teachers Nursing interventions for fall prevention in hospitalized aged people: an integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1