Positive logics

IF 0.3 4区 数学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Archive for Mathematical Logic Pub Date : 2022-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s00153-022-00837-3
Saharon Shelah, Jouko Väänänen
{"title":"Positive logics","authors":"Saharon Shelah,&nbsp;Jouko Väänänen","doi":"10.1007/s00153-022-00837-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lindström’s Theorem characterizes first order logic as the maximal logic satisfying the Compactness Theorem and the Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem. If we do not assume that logics are closed under negation, there is an obvious extension of first order logic with the two model theoretic properties mentioned, namely existential second order logic. We show that existential second order logic has a whole family of proper extensions satisfying the Compactness Theorem and the Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem. Furthermore, we show that in the context of negation-less logics, <i>positive logics</i>, as we call them, there is no strongest extension of first order logic with the Compactness Theorem and the Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00153-022-00837-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-022-00837-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lindström’s Theorem characterizes first order logic as the maximal logic satisfying the Compactness Theorem and the Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem. If we do not assume that logics are closed under negation, there is an obvious extension of first order logic with the two model theoretic properties mentioned, namely existential second order logic. We show that existential second order logic has a whole family of proper extensions satisfying the Compactness Theorem and the Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem. Furthermore, we show that in the context of negation-less logics, positive logics, as we call them, there is no strongest extension of first order logic with the Compactness Theorem and the Downward Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极的逻辑
Lindström定理将一阶逻辑描述为满足紧性定理和向下Löwenheim-Skolem定理的最大逻辑。如果我们不假设逻辑在否定下是封闭的,那么一阶逻辑有一个明显的扩展,具有上述两个模型论性质,即存在二阶逻辑。我们证明了存在二阶逻辑具有满足紧性定理和向下Löwenheim-Skolem定理的一整族固有扩展。进一步,我们证明了在无否定逻辑,即我们所说的正逻辑的背景下,一阶逻辑不存在紧性定理和向下Löwenheim-Skolem定理的最强扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archive for Mathematical Logic
Archive for Mathematical Logic MATHEMATICS-LOGIC
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.
期刊最新文献
Punctually presented structures II: comparing presentations The Tarski–Lindenbaum algebra of the class of strongly constructivizable models with $$\omega $$-stable theories Glivenko–Cantelli classes and NIP formulas Separablilty of metric measure spaces and choice axioms Fragments of IOpen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1