Teacher cheating: Are students affected by teachers who cheat? Evidence from a predominately Black district

Q1 Social Sciences Review of Black Political Economy Pub Date : 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1177/00346446211068163
Carycruz Bueno, J. Apperson
{"title":"Teacher cheating: Are students affected by teachers who cheat? Evidence from a predominately Black district","authors":"Carycruz Bueno, J. Apperson","doi":"10.1177/00346446211068163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the evidence linking test scores to long-run student outcomes has grown, standardized assessments have become a widely used management tool in education including addressing the racial education gap. One of the concerns with the use of standards tests is the perverse incentive for teachers to alter test scores. The consequences for educators found cheating can be substantial, although little is known about how students are impacted by cheating. Using an 11-year panel of individual-level data on students and teachers from a predominantly Black urban school district where widespread test-score manipulation occurred, we investigated the impact of teacher cheating on subsequent student test scores. To access the impact, we used school-grade and classroom fixed effects as well as measure potential omitted variable bias (OVB). We found that for each additional wrong-to-right altered test question it is associated with a reduced future achievement of between 0.003 and 0.014 standard deviations depending on the specification. Although the evidence from OVB analysis does not suggest that test-score manipulation itself harmed or benefited students. Our evidence also contributes to a growing literature on the importance of sensitivity tests for OVB. We show how failure to conduct such tests could lead to erroneous findings.","PeriodicalId":35867,"journal":{"name":"Review of Black Political Economy","volume":"43 1","pages":"58 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Black Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446211068163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the evidence linking test scores to long-run student outcomes has grown, standardized assessments have become a widely used management tool in education including addressing the racial education gap. One of the concerns with the use of standards tests is the perverse incentive for teachers to alter test scores. The consequences for educators found cheating can be substantial, although little is known about how students are impacted by cheating. Using an 11-year panel of individual-level data on students and teachers from a predominantly Black urban school district where widespread test-score manipulation occurred, we investigated the impact of teacher cheating on subsequent student test scores. To access the impact, we used school-grade and classroom fixed effects as well as measure potential omitted variable bias (OVB). We found that for each additional wrong-to-right altered test question it is associated with a reduced future achievement of between 0.003 and 0.014 standard deviations depending on the specification. Although the evidence from OVB analysis does not suggest that test-score manipulation itself harmed or benefited students. Our evidence also contributes to a growing literature on the importance of sensitivity tests for OVB. We show how failure to conduct such tests could lead to erroneous findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师作弊:教师作弊会影响学生吗?证据来自一个以黑人为主的地区
随着将考试成绩与学生的长期成绩联系起来的证据越来越多,标准化评估已成为广泛使用的教育管理工具,包括解决种族教育差距。使用标准考试的担忧之一是教师改变考试成绩的不正当动机。教育工作者发现,作弊的后果可能是巨大的,尽管人们对作弊对学生的影响知之甚少。我们使用了11年的个人层面的数据面板,这些数据来自一个以黑人为主的城市学区,该学区普遍存在考试成绩操纵现象,我们调查了教师作弊对随后学生考试成绩的影响。为了获得影响,我们使用了年级和教室固定效应,并测量了潜在遗漏变量偏差(OVB)。我们发现,根据规范,每增加一个从错误到正确的修改试题,未来的成绩就会降低0.003到0.014个标准差。尽管来自OVB分析的证据并不表明考试分数操纵本身对学生有害或有益。我们的证据也有助于越来越多的文献对OVB敏感性测试的重要性。我们展示了不进行此类测试如何可能导致错误的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Black Political Economy
Review of Black Political Economy Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Review of Black Political Economy examines issues related to the economic status of African-American and Third World peoples. It identifies and analyzes policy prescriptions designed to reduce racial economic inequality. The journal is devoted to appraising public and private policies for their ability to advance economic opportunities without regard to their theoretical or ideological origins. A publication of the National Economic Association and the Southern Center for Studies in Public Policy of Clark College.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Public Investment on Private Investment in Botswana: A Disaggregated Approach The Relative Impact of Historically Black College and University Economics Departments and Economists: Has the Hierarchy Changed Since the Turn of the Century? Responsibility and Restitution in the Freedman's Bank Crisis Book Review: The New Age of Empire: How Racism and Colonialism Still Rule the World by Kehinde Andrews Personal Reflections on the Life and Legacy of Bill Spriggs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1