Assessing the diversification risk of a single equity market: evidence from the largest European stock indexes

Artor Nuhiu, Florin Aliu, Bedri Peci
{"title":"Assessing the diversification risk of a single equity market: evidence from the largest European stock indexes","authors":"Artor Nuhiu, Florin Aliu, Bedri Peci","doi":"10.2478/ijme-2022-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Diversification of financial securities is considered a substantial element of portfolio risk. In this context, the construction of an optimal portfolio is an ongoing concern for portfolio managers. This study measures the risk–reward tradeoffs linked to the stock indexes of Germany, Spain, Italy, France, and England. First, the stock indexes are analyzed as individual portfolios and later compared to the hypothetical common equity index. The results show diversification benefits gained from a hypothetical common European stock market. Individual stock prices and trade volumes are collected weekly from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018. The results indicate that, on average, the most well-diversified equity indexes are IBEX35, FTSE MIB, and FTSE100. In contrast, DAX, MDAX, and CAC40 on average tend to be less diversified. The diversification risk for DAX, MDAX, and CAC40 decreases from joining a common hypothetical stock market, while for FTSE100, FTSE MIB, and IBEX it increases.","PeriodicalId":43388,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2022-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Diversification of financial securities is considered a substantial element of portfolio risk. In this context, the construction of an optimal portfolio is an ongoing concern for portfolio managers. This study measures the risk–reward tradeoffs linked to the stock indexes of Germany, Spain, Italy, France, and England. First, the stock indexes are analyzed as individual portfolios and later compared to the hypothetical common equity index. The results show diversification benefits gained from a hypothetical common European stock market. Individual stock prices and trade volumes are collected weekly from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2018. The results indicate that, on average, the most well-diversified equity indexes are IBEX35, FTSE MIB, and FTSE100. In contrast, DAX, MDAX, and CAC40 on average tend to be less diversified. The diversification risk for DAX, MDAX, and CAC40 decreases from joining a common hypothetical stock market, while for FTSE100, FTSE MIB, and IBEX it increases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估单一股票市场的多元化风险:来自欧洲最大股指的证据
金融证券的分散化被认为是投资组合风险的重要组成部分。在这种情况下,最优投资组合的构建是投资组合经理持续关注的问题。本研究测量了与德国、西班牙、意大利、法国和英国股票指数相关的风险回报权衡。首先,将股票指数作为单个投资组合进行分析,然后将其与假设的普通股指数进行比较。结果显示,假设一个欧洲共同股票市场可以带来多样化的好处。从2008年1月1日至2018年12月31日,每周收集个股价格和交易量。结果表明,平均而言,多元化程度最高的股票指数是IBEX35、FTSE MIB和FTSE100。相比之下,DAX、MDAX和CAC40的平均多元化程度往往较低。DAX、MDAX和CAC40的分散风险因加入一个共同的假设股票市场而降低,而FTSE100、FTSE MIB和IBEX的分散风险则增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Global value chains before and in times of the COVID-19 pandemic Public participation in rural areas supported by regional governments in the context of sustainable rural development: The case of Poland Determinants of the success of participatory budgets in Poland Restrictions applied by WTO countries in international trade in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic The “autumn effect” in the gold market—does it contradict the Adaptive Market Hypothesis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1