Evaluation of Some Mathematical Models for Estimating Evaluation of Some Mathematical Models for Estimating

C. Okoli, K. Egunjobi
{"title":"Evaluation of Some Mathematical Models for Estimating Evaluation of Some Mathematical Models for Estimating","authors":"C. Okoli, K. Egunjobi","doi":"10.4314/JASET.V6I2.38314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantifying evaporation from bare soil is critical for water resources development in arid regions and for bare or fallow agricultural land. Some researchers have commented on typical characteristics of arid regions most potential evaporation is extremely high and available water is limited, thus emphasizing the need for accurate and robust potential evaporation models. The purpose of this paper is to review the abilities of three models to describe diurnal variation of potential evaporations over bare soils. The models discussed are the Penman – Brutsaert, Priestley and Taylor and the advection aridity-actual evaporation model by Brutsaert and Stricker. These three models require atmospheric measurements at only one level and no calibration of surface properties is required. The critical results of the application of these models showed that under a variety of atmospheric conditions Penman-Brutsaert model gave the best description of\nthe measured fluxes. Priestley – Taylor with α = 1.26 performed best under unstable\natmospheric conditions especially where radiation is the primary mechanism forcing the\nevaporation. The Advective – Aridity equation, which relies on complementary relationship\nbetween actual and potential evaporation, and could underestimate evaporation but performed best at higher wind speed. Keywords : Evaporation, Water Vapour, Bare soil, Models Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 6 (1) 2006 pp. 81-86","PeriodicalId":7884,"journal":{"name":"Andalasian International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology","volume":"73 1","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andalasian International Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JASET.V6I2.38314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying evaporation from bare soil is critical for water resources development in arid regions and for bare or fallow agricultural land. Some researchers have commented on typical characteristics of arid regions most potential evaporation is extremely high and available water is limited, thus emphasizing the need for accurate and robust potential evaporation models. The purpose of this paper is to review the abilities of three models to describe diurnal variation of potential evaporations over bare soils. The models discussed are the Penman – Brutsaert, Priestley and Taylor and the advection aridity-actual evaporation model by Brutsaert and Stricker. These three models require atmospheric measurements at only one level and no calibration of surface properties is required. The critical results of the application of these models showed that under a variety of atmospheric conditions Penman-Brutsaert model gave the best description of the measured fluxes. Priestley – Taylor with α = 1.26 performed best under unstable atmospheric conditions especially where radiation is the primary mechanism forcing the evaporation. The Advective – Aridity equation, which relies on complementary relationship between actual and potential evaporation, and could underestimate evaporation but performed best at higher wind speed. Keywords : Evaporation, Water Vapour, Bare soil, Models Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 6 (1) 2006 pp. 81-86
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
若干估计数学模型的评价若干估计数学模型的评价
对干旱地区和裸地或休耕农用地的水资源开发来说,对裸地蒸发量进行量化是至关重要的。一些研究人员对干旱区的典型特征提出了看法,即潜在蒸发量极高,可利用水量有限,因此强调了建立准确、可靠的潜在蒸发量模型的必要性。本文的目的是回顾三个模型描述裸地潜在蒸发量日变化的能力。讨论了Penman - Brutsaert, Priestley和Taylor模型以及Brutsaert和Stricker的平流干燥-实际蒸发模型。这三种模式只需要在一个水平上进行大气测量,不需要对表面特性进行校准。这些模型应用的关键结果表明,在各种大气条件下,Penman-Brutsaert模型能最好地描述所测通量。α = 1.26的Priestley - Taylor在不稳定的大气条件下表现最好,特别是在辐射是迫使蒸发的主要机制的情况下。基于实际蒸发量和潜在蒸发量之间的互补关系的平流-干旱方程可能低估了蒸发量,但在较高风速下表现最佳。关键词:蒸发,水蒸气,裸土,模型,应用科学,工程与技术Vol. 6 (1) 2006 pp. 81-86
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of Resultant Forces for 2D Hyperstatic Frames using Android-Based Frame Design Application and Finite Element Analysis Enhancing Current Density and Specific Capacitance of Nata de Coco, TEMPO, and MXene Composites through Boiling Time Variations Integration of Photovoltaic Distributed Generation in Grid Distribution Network: A Literature Review Overcurrent and Directional Overcurrent Protection for Microgrid Study of Laccase Activity as a Biosensor for Peatland Degradation in Oil Palm Plantations in Pesisir Selatan of West Sumatra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1