{"title":"Semiotic Diagnostics of the Trajectory Splitting between a Dream of the Past and Dream of the Future","authors":"Irina Melik-Gajkazyan","doi":"10.18254/s207987840021199-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All areas of humanitarian and social knowledge include the study of the interactions between the individual, society and culture. Such an interaction is considered in the article through the prism of the phenomenon of a dream. In society, among the forces are acting there, a collective dream has a special power. In culture, the collective dream creates two forms: myth (dream of the past) and utopia (dream of the future). The measure of adherence to the forms of the collective dream and/or the degree of independent interpretation of the symbolism of myth and utopia becomes a characteristic of the individual. The proposed perspective is justified by the fact that the trajectories of the collective dream symbolism translation are visualised by the sociocultural dynamics model. The model combines ideas of the semiotic mechanism of culture (Ju. Lotman, B. Uspensky) and the basic stages of information processes. The distribution of information characteristics across the stages of sociocultural dynamics, firstly, reveals the trajectories of a dream transformation. Secondly, it opens up methodological possibilities of verifying the study results for the role and place of the “dreaming subject” obscured by the “big processes” of the history of culture.","PeriodicalId":43742,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskaya Istoriya","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskaya Istoriya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840021199-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
All areas of humanitarian and social knowledge include the study of the interactions between the individual, society and culture. Such an interaction is considered in the article through the prism of the phenomenon of a dream. In society, among the forces are acting there, a collective dream has a special power. In culture, the collective dream creates two forms: myth (dream of the past) and utopia (dream of the future). The measure of adherence to the forms of the collective dream and/or the degree of independent interpretation of the symbolism of myth and utopia becomes a characteristic of the individual. The proposed perspective is justified by the fact that the trajectories of the collective dream symbolism translation are visualised by the sociocultural dynamics model. The model combines ideas of the semiotic mechanism of culture (Ju. Lotman, B. Uspensky) and the basic stages of information processes. The distribution of information characteristics across the stages of sociocultural dynamics, firstly, reveals the trajectories of a dream transformation. Secondly, it opens up methodological possibilities of verifying the study results for the role and place of the “dreaming subject” obscured by the “big processes” of the history of culture.
人道主义和社会知识的所有领域都包括对个人、社会和文化之间相互作用的研究。这种相互作用在文章中是通过梦现象的棱镜来考虑的。在社会中,在起作用的各种力量中,集体的梦想具有一种特殊的力量。在文化中,集体梦想创造了两种形式:神话(对过去的梦想)和乌托邦(对未来的梦想)。对集体梦想形式的坚持和/或对神话和乌托邦象征主义的独立解释程度的衡量成为个人的特征。社会文化动力学模型将集体梦象征主义翻译的轨迹可视化,证明了这一观点是正确的。该模型结合了文化符号学机制的思想。Lotman, B. Uspensky)和信息处理的基本阶段。跨社会文化动态阶段的信息特征分布,首先揭示了梦的转变轨迹。其次,它为被文化史的“大过程”所遮蔽的“做梦主体”的作用和地位提供了验证研究结果的方法论可能性。