Review of population history reconstruction methods in conservation biology

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecological genetics Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI:10.17816/ecogen120078
A. Totikov, Andrey A. Tomarovsky, Aliya R. Yakupova, A. Graphodatsky, S. Kliver
{"title":"Review of population history reconstruction methods in conservation biology","authors":"A. Totikov, Andrey A. Tomarovsky, Aliya R. Yakupova, A. Graphodatsky, S. Kliver","doi":"10.17816/ecogen120078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demographic history reconstruction is based on the estimation of effective population size (Ne), which is inferred and interpreted in various fields of evolutionary and conservation biology. Interest in Ne estimation is growing, as the key evolutionary forces and their are linked to Ne, and genetic data become increasingly accessible. However, what is effective population size, and how can we obtain an estimate of effective population size? In this review, we describe the history of the term Ne and explore existing methods for obtaining historical and contemporary estimates of changes in effective population size. We provide a detailed overview of methods based on sequential Markovian coalescence (SMC), generalized phylogenetic coalescence (G-PhoCS), identity by descent (IBD) and identity by state (IBS) similarity, as well as methods using allele frequency spectrum (AFS). For each method, we briefly summarize the underlying theory and note its advantages and disadvantages. In the final section of the review, we present examples of the use of these methods for various non-model species with conservation status.","PeriodicalId":11431,"journal":{"name":"Ecological genetics","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen120078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demographic history reconstruction is based on the estimation of effective population size (Ne), which is inferred and interpreted in various fields of evolutionary and conservation biology. Interest in Ne estimation is growing, as the key evolutionary forces and their are linked to Ne, and genetic data become increasingly accessible. However, what is effective population size, and how can we obtain an estimate of effective population size? In this review, we describe the history of the term Ne and explore existing methods for obtaining historical and contemporary estimates of changes in effective population size. We provide a detailed overview of methods based on sequential Markovian coalescence (SMC), generalized phylogenetic coalescence (G-PhoCS), identity by descent (IBD) and identity by state (IBS) similarity, as well as methods using allele frequency spectrum (AFS). For each method, we briefly summarize the underlying theory and note its advantages and disadvantages. In the final section of the review, we present examples of the use of these methods for various non-model species with conservation status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护生物学种群历史重建方法综述
人口历史重建是基于有效种群大小(Ne)的估计,这是在进化和保护生物学的各个领域推断和解释。随着关键的进化力量及其与Ne的联系,以及基因数据变得越来越容易获取,对Ne估计的兴趣正在增长。然而,什么是有效人口规模,我们如何获得有效人口规模的估计?在这篇综述中,我们描述了Ne一词的历史,并探讨了获得有效种群规模变化的历史和当代估计的现有方法。我们详细概述了基于序贯马尔可夫聚结(SMC)、广义系统发育聚结(G-PhoCS)、血统同一性(IBD)和状态同一性(IBS)相似性的方法,以及使用等位基因频谱(AFS)的方法。对于每种方法,我们简要地总结了其基本理论,并指出其优点和缺点。在综述的最后一部分,我们给出了使用这些方法对各种具有保护状态的非模式物种的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological genetics
Ecological genetics Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological genetics is an international journal which accepts for consideration original manuscripts that reflect the results of field and experimental studies, and fundamental research of broad conceptual and/or comparative context corresponding to the profile of the Journal. Once a year, the editorial Board reviews and, if necessary, corrects the rules for authors and the journal rubrics.
期刊最新文献
CRISPR/Cas editing of a CPC gene in Arabidopsis thaliana Hairy roots biochemical characteristics of vegetable pea’s morphotype with modified leaf Erratum to “The strong base for using base editing in plants” (doi: 10.17816/ecogen567885) PCR-based genome walking methods (review) Ecological genetics. What is it? 20 years later
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1