Analytical study for neonates with respiratory distress on mechanical ventilation admitted to NICU - Minia University Hospital

Salah M. Saleh, Abdel-Azeem M. El-Mazary, E. Mohammed
{"title":"Analytical study for neonates with respiratory distress on mechanical ventilation admitted to NICU - Minia University Hospital","authors":"Salah M. Saleh, Abdel-Azeem M. El-Mazary, E. Mohammed","doi":"10.21608/anj.2019.45814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Ventilatory assistance allows for the recovery and maintenance of the patient with cardiorespiratory failure. Thanks to this intervention, many neonatal patient`s lives are saved in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Objectives: This study is a prospective study to analyze the rate of failure and response of management of those patients on mechanical ventilation and relation between the response of cases on MV and different studied demographic, clinical and laboratory data. Patients and methods: All neonates with respiratory distress admitted from February 2018 to February 2019.Clinical response of mechanical ventilation cases was observed. Demographic and clinical data of neonates included in the study were collected and analyzed. Results: Among of 316 neonates, 162 cases (51.26%) treated with o2 only, 28 cases (8.86%) treated with bubble CPAP ,126 cases (39.87%) treated with mechanical ventilation. The cases on MV who survived were (23%) and cases who died were (77%). Low birth weight <2.5 kg: outcome is poor for VLBW and ELBW than NBW and LBW. Small gestational age < 34 weeks GA showed higher mortality .RDS were the most common cause for usage of MV. In MV settings with initial high Fio2 and PEEP were more in died group. Sepsis, shock and pulmonary hemorrhage were most common complications and both are associated with higher risk for mortality than other complications. Conclusion: It was found that predictors of mortality in mechanically ventilated neonates concluded from this study were: low birth weight <2.5 kg with poorer outcome for VLBW and ELBW than NBW and LBW also small gestational age with poor outcome for neonates below 34 weeks GA especially with lack of use of lung surfactant in cases with RDS in VLBW and ELBW.","PeriodicalId":8054,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neonatology Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neonatology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/anj.2019.45814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Ventilatory assistance allows for the recovery and maintenance of the patient with cardiorespiratory failure. Thanks to this intervention, many neonatal patient`s lives are saved in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Objectives: This study is a prospective study to analyze the rate of failure and response of management of those patients on mechanical ventilation and relation between the response of cases on MV and different studied demographic, clinical and laboratory data. Patients and methods: All neonates with respiratory distress admitted from February 2018 to February 2019.Clinical response of mechanical ventilation cases was observed. Demographic and clinical data of neonates included in the study were collected and analyzed. Results: Among of 316 neonates, 162 cases (51.26%) treated with o2 only, 28 cases (8.86%) treated with bubble CPAP ,126 cases (39.87%) treated with mechanical ventilation. The cases on MV who survived were (23%) and cases who died were (77%). Low birth weight <2.5 kg: outcome is poor for VLBW and ELBW than NBW and LBW. Small gestational age < 34 weeks GA showed higher mortality .RDS were the most common cause for usage of MV. In MV settings with initial high Fio2 and PEEP were more in died group. Sepsis, shock and pulmonary hemorrhage were most common complications and both are associated with higher risk for mortality than other complications. Conclusion: It was found that predictors of mortality in mechanically ventilated neonates concluded from this study were: low birth weight <2.5 kg with poorer outcome for VLBW and ELBW than NBW and LBW also small gestational age with poor outcome for neonates below 34 weeks GA especially with lack of use of lung surfactant in cases with RDS in VLBW and ELBW.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南京大学附属NICU收治机械通气新生儿呼吸窘迫的分析研究
简介:呼吸辅助可以帮助心肺衰竭患者恢复和维持生命。由于这种干预,许多新生儿患者的生命在新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)得到了挽救。目的:本研究是一项前瞻性研究,分析机械通气患者的管理失败率和反应率,以及病例对机械通气的反应与所研究的不同人口统计学、临床和实验室数据的关系。患者和方法:2018年2月至2019年2月收治的所有呼吸窘迫新生儿。观察机械通气病例的临床反应。收集并分析纳入研究的新生儿的人口学和临床资料。结果:316例新生儿中,单纯氧气治疗162例(51.26%),气泡CPAP治疗28例(8.86%),机械通气126例(39.87%)。接受MV治疗的患者中有23%存活,77%死亡。低出生体重<2.5 kg: VLBW和ELBW的预后比NBW和LBW差。小胎龄< 34周GA死亡率较高,rds是使用MV最常见的原因。在初始高Fio2和PEEP的MV设置中,死亡组较多。败血症、休克和肺出血是最常见的并发症,两者的死亡率都高于其他并发症。结论:本研究得出的机械通气新生儿死亡率预测因子为:低出生体重<2.5 kg, VLBW和ELBW的预后较NBW和LBW差;小于34周龄的新生儿预后较差,特别是在VLBW和ELBW的RDS病例中缺乏肺表面活性物质的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associated Cardiac Anomalies Detected by Echocardiography in Infants and Children with Congenital Malformations. A Prospective-Analytical Study Perinatal Care and Threshold of Viability; A Great Dilemma Caffeine Citrate in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Fibreoptic Assessment of Post Intubation Laryngotracheal Injuries in Neonatal and Pediatrics Intensive Care Units. A Prospective-Cross Sectional Study The Role of Absolute Monocytic Count in Early Diagnosis of Nercotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Neonates. A Prospective Analytical Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1