Establishing Flow Regimes for Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells in Low-Permeability Reservoirs

Hafiz Mustafa Ud Din Sheikh, W. J. Lee, H. Jha, Sheraz Ahmed
{"title":"Establishing Flow Regimes for Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells in Low-Permeability Reservoirs","authors":"Hafiz Mustafa Ud Din Sheikh, W. J. Lee, H. Jha, Sheraz Ahmed","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22694-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents rigorous theoretical guidelines for durations of flow regimes for multi-fractured horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoirs. Theory and practice lead us to expect four regimes: early ramp-up, transient, transition, and boundary-dominated flow (BDF) in these wells. We must model each of these flow regimes for proper forecasting and for construction of TWPs (aka type wells or type curves), but, without guidance from theory and verification in practice, the durations of these flow regimes are difficult to observe in production histories or to predict when forecasting. These forecasts have significant impact on financial decisions regarding low-permeability reservoir development.\n We can most readily identify flow regimes using log-log plots of pressure-normalized rate vs. time for wells produced at near-constant bottom-hole pressure. This is adequate to determine the start and end of transient flow, with a straight line whose slope is near −1/2. Diagnosis is enhanced if we add normalized rate vs. material-balance time plots, which transform the well response to an equivalent constant-rate profile, on which we can identify BDF with a straight line with −1 slope. On this plot, the transition flow regime lies between the end of transient flow and the start of BDF. In some wells, with relatively longer production histories, we can readily identify these flow regimes, but many if not most wells in a play will display neither transition nor BDF regimes. To fill this gap in knowledge, we simulated flow histories using analytical solutions, which provide shapes and durations of the flow regimes. Starts and ends of flow regimes depend on arbitrary assumptions about deviations from straight lines, which can be determined in theory using derivatives of the analytical solutions. In practice, wells do not follow theory exactly by any means, but we find in our examination of actual well production histories that theory provides excellent guidance that enhances our understanding of actual production profiles.\n We present our simulated production histories for wells in terms of dimensionless variables, which generalizes their applicability. For actual situations, with known or estimated reservoir and completion properties, we can use these plots of dimensionless variables to determine approximate durations of flow regimes. Importantly, for the common situation in which no production data are available beyond transient flow, we can estimate the shape of the remaining production profile in a way significantly superior to the common two-segment Arps decline model with an assumed terminal decline rate at an assumed time. Critics of the industry, particularly in the financial community, have suggested that this common approach leads to optimistic production forecasts.\n Realistic forecasts of production profiles for individual wells, which our workflow based on rigorous theory enhances, can improve the credibility of resource evaluators within and beyond individual companies. This is especially important for TWP construction, on which many important financial decisions are based.","PeriodicalId":11027,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22694-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents rigorous theoretical guidelines for durations of flow regimes for multi-fractured horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoirs. Theory and practice lead us to expect four regimes: early ramp-up, transient, transition, and boundary-dominated flow (BDF) in these wells. We must model each of these flow regimes for proper forecasting and for construction of TWPs (aka type wells or type curves), but, without guidance from theory and verification in practice, the durations of these flow regimes are difficult to observe in production histories or to predict when forecasting. These forecasts have significant impact on financial decisions regarding low-permeability reservoir development. We can most readily identify flow regimes using log-log plots of pressure-normalized rate vs. time for wells produced at near-constant bottom-hole pressure. This is adequate to determine the start and end of transient flow, with a straight line whose slope is near −1/2. Diagnosis is enhanced if we add normalized rate vs. material-balance time plots, which transform the well response to an equivalent constant-rate profile, on which we can identify BDF with a straight line with −1 slope. On this plot, the transition flow regime lies between the end of transient flow and the start of BDF. In some wells, with relatively longer production histories, we can readily identify these flow regimes, but many if not most wells in a play will display neither transition nor BDF regimes. To fill this gap in knowledge, we simulated flow histories using analytical solutions, which provide shapes and durations of the flow regimes. Starts and ends of flow regimes depend on arbitrary assumptions about deviations from straight lines, which can be determined in theory using derivatives of the analytical solutions. In practice, wells do not follow theory exactly by any means, but we find in our examination of actual well production histories that theory provides excellent guidance that enhances our understanding of actual production profiles. We present our simulated production histories for wells in terms of dimensionless variables, which generalizes their applicability. For actual situations, with known or estimated reservoir and completion properties, we can use these plots of dimensionless variables to determine approximate durations of flow regimes. Importantly, for the common situation in which no production data are available beyond transient flow, we can estimate the shape of the remaining production profile in a way significantly superior to the common two-segment Arps decline model with an assumed terminal decline rate at an assumed time. Critics of the industry, particularly in the financial community, have suggested that this common approach leads to optimistic production forecasts. Realistic forecasts of production profiles for individual wells, which our workflow based on rigorous theory enhances, can improve the credibility of resource evaluators within and beyond individual companies. This is especially important for TWP construction, on which many important financial decisions are based.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低渗透油藏多缝水平井流动规律的建立
本文提出了超低渗透油藏多级压裂水平井流态持续时间的严格理论准则。理论和实践表明,在这些井中有四种状态:早期上升、瞬态、过渡和边界主导流(BDF)。我们必须对每一种流态进行建模,以便进行正确的预测和twp的建设(又名类型井或类型曲线),但是,如果没有理论指导和实践验证,这些流态的持续时间很难在生产历史中观察到,也很难在预测时进行预测。这些预测对低渗透油藏开发的财务决策具有重要影响。在井底压力接近恒定的情况下,我们可以很容易地利用压力归一化速率与时间的对数图来确定流动状态。这足以确定瞬态流动的开始和结束,其斜率接近- 1/2的直线。如果我们添加归一化速率与物质平衡时间图,可以增强诊断,将井响应转换为等效的恒定速率剖面,在该剖面上,我们可以识别斜率为- 1的直线BDF。在该图中,过渡流型位于瞬态流结束和BDF开始之间。在一些生产历史相对较长的井中,我们可以很容易地识别出这些流动状态,但在一个区块中,许多井(如果不是大多数井)既没有过渡状态,也没有BDF状态。为了填补这一知识空白,我们使用解析解模拟了流动历史,它提供了流动状态的形状和持续时间。流型的开始和结束取决于对偏离直线的任意假设,这可以在理论上使用解析解的导数来确定。在实践中,井并不完全遵循理论,但在对实际井生产历史的研究中,我们发现理论提供了很好的指导,增强了我们对实际生产剖面的理解。我们以无因次变量的形式给出了模拟井的生产历史,从而推广了它们的适用性。对于已知或估计的油藏和完井性质的实际情况,我们可以使用这些无因次变量图来确定流动状态的近似持续时间。重要的是,对于除瞬态流之外没有可用生产数据的常见情况,我们可以以一种明显优于常见的两段Arps递减模型的方式估计剩余生产剖面的形状,该模型具有假设的终端递减率。该行业的批评者,尤其是金融界的批评者认为,这种常见的方法导致了乐观的产量预测。基于严谨的理论,我们的工作流程可以增强对单井生产剖面的现实预测,从而提高单个公司内外资源评估人员的可信度。这对TWP建设尤其重要,因为许多重要的财务决策都是基于TWP建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Data Driven Method to Predict and Restore Missing Well Head Flow Pressure Downhole Camera Run Validates Limited Entry Fracturing Technique and Improves Pay Coverage in Deep Tight Laminated Gas Reservoir of Western India An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Oil/Gas Composition on the Performance of Carbonated Water Injection CWI SmartPoint Seismic Data Acquisition System Reservoir Characterization for Isolated Porosity from Multi-Frequency Dielectric Measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1