{"title":"Water Absorption by Hydrogel Using Fertilizers","authors":"J. F. Sobrinho, F.E.L. Barbosa","doi":"10.5539/enrr.v10n2p26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was sought, in this research, to evaluate the effects of fertilizer solutions on water retention by hydrogel as well as if the application methods and fertilizers affect water retention when the hydrogel is added to the soil. In laboratory works (experiment 1), the completely randomized design was used taking into account four treatments: distilled water; Urea (UR – 2.0 g L-1 ) and Magnesium Sulfate + Monoammonium Phosphate (MS + MAP – 2.0 g L-1 each). Regarding the experiment 2, considering soil columns, a 2x3x2 factorial was used, corresponding to two hydrogel application methods: dry and mixed to the soil or diluted in water and concentrated in the center of the column; three fertilizer solutions: distilled water, UR (2.0 g L-1 ) and MS + MAP (2.0 g L-1 each) with two cycles and three repetitions. An additional witness (hydrogel free) was also added. Total water volume absorbed by hydrogel, volume stored in the soil after each cycle, pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of leached solutions were all analyzed. The MS solution was the one who impacted the most the water absorption by the hydrogel, principally when the hydrogel was not present in the soil. The pH and EC of leached solutions evidenced the fertilizer solutions salinity.","PeriodicalId":11699,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v10n2p26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
It was sought, in this research, to evaluate the effects of fertilizer solutions on water retention by hydrogel as well as if the application methods and fertilizers affect water retention when the hydrogel is added to the soil. In laboratory works (experiment 1), the completely randomized design was used taking into account four treatments: distilled water; Urea (UR – 2.0 g L-1 ) and Magnesium Sulfate + Monoammonium Phosphate (MS + MAP – 2.0 g L-1 each). Regarding the experiment 2, considering soil columns, a 2x3x2 factorial was used, corresponding to two hydrogel application methods: dry and mixed to the soil or diluted in water and concentrated in the center of the column; three fertilizer solutions: distilled water, UR (2.0 g L-1 ) and MS + MAP (2.0 g L-1 each) with two cycles and three repetitions. An additional witness (hydrogel free) was also added. Total water volume absorbed by hydrogel, volume stored in the soil after each cycle, pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of leached solutions were all analyzed. The MS solution was the one who impacted the most the water absorption by the hydrogel, principally when the hydrogel was not present in the soil. The pH and EC of leached solutions evidenced the fertilizer solutions salinity.
本研究旨在评价肥料溶液对水凝胶保水性的影响,以及当水凝胶加入土壤时,施用方法和肥料是否会影响水凝胶的保水性。在实验室作品(实验1)中,采用完全随机设计,考虑四种处理:蒸馏水;尿素(UR - 2.0 g L-1)和硫酸镁+磷酸一铵(MS + MAP - 2.0 g L-1)。实验2考虑土柱,采用2x3x2因子,对应两种水凝胶施药方法:干燥混合到土中或用水稀释浓缩到柱中央;3种肥料溶液:蒸馏水、UR (2.0 g L-1)和MS + MAP(各2.0 g L-1),循环2次,重复3次。另外还添加了一种见证人(不含水凝胶)。分析了水凝胶吸附总水量、各循环后土壤中贮存水量、浸出液的pH值和电导率(EC)。质谱溶液对水凝胶的吸水性影响最大,特别是当水凝胶不存在于土壤中时。浸出液的pH值和EC值反映了肥料溶液的盐度。