The JOBS Act disclosure exemptions: Some early evidence

Aleksandra B. Zimmerman
{"title":"The JOBS Act disclosure exemptions: Some early evidence","authors":"Aleksandra B. Zimmerman","doi":"10.1016/j.racreg.2015.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines early evidence of IPO registrants' disclosure exemption choices in response to the optional disclosure relief provided by the recently enacted Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act) of 2012. The JOBS Act provides firms going public classified as “emerging growth companies” (EGCs) with certain accounting and financial reporting and disclosure exemptions not available to other issuers. The study's results for EGC firms filing prospectuses through August, 2013, indicate that for the earliest companies affected by the JOBS Act, greater board independence and audit committee accounting expertise are associated with greater likelihood of <em>foregoing</em> financial reporting exemptions. Moreover, the study finds that scaled executive compensation disclosure exemptions had widespread acceptance while the private company accounting standards and reduced audited financial statements exemption provisions were initially less utilized. Finally, the study finds that even though the JOBS Act raised the threshold for disclosure relief up to $1 billion in revenues, those firms that were already classified as smaller reporting companies which already have less extensive disclosure demands under SRC Rule #33–8876, were those most likely to initially take these exemptions. The paper discusses the practical implications of the study's findings for accounting standard-setters, watchdogs, and policy makers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101074,"journal":{"name":"Research in Accounting Regulation","volume":"27 1","pages":"Pages 73-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2015.03.009","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Accounting Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052045715000107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper examines early evidence of IPO registrants' disclosure exemption choices in response to the optional disclosure relief provided by the recently enacted Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act) of 2012. The JOBS Act provides firms going public classified as “emerging growth companies” (EGCs) with certain accounting and financial reporting and disclosure exemptions not available to other issuers. The study's results for EGC firms filing prospectuses through August, 2013, indicate that for the earliest companies affected by the JOBS Act, greater board independence and audit committee accounting expertise are associated with greater likelihood of foregoing financial reporting exemptions. Moreover, the study finds that scaled executive compensation disclosure exemptions had widespread acceptance while the private company accounting standards and reduced audited financial statements exemption provisions were initially less utilized. Finally, the study finds that even though the JOBS Act raised the threshold for disclosure relief up to $1 billion in revenues, those firms that were already classified as smaller reporting companies which already have less extensive disclosure demands under SRC Rule #33–8876, were those most likely to initially take these exemptions. The paper discusses the practical implications of the study's findings for accounting standard-setters, watchdogs, and policy makers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《就业法案》披露豁免:一些早期证据
本文考察了IPO注册人针对2012年《创业创业法案》(JOBS Act)提供的可选披露救济而做出的披露豁免选择的早期证据。《就业法案》规定,被归类为“新兴成长型公司”(EGCs)的上市公司享有其他发行人无法获得的某些会计和财务报告及披露豁免。对2013年8月之前提交招股说明书的EGC公司的研究结果表明,对于最早受《就业法案》影响的公司,董事会独立性和审计委员会会计专业知识越高,上述财务报告豁免的可能性就越大。此外,研究发现,规模高管薪酬披露豁免被广泛接受,而私营公司会计准则和缩减的经审计财务报表豁免条款最初较少使用。最后,研究发现,即使JOBS法案将披露减免的门槛提高到10亿美元的收入,那些已经被归类为小型报告公司的公司,在SRC规则第33-8876号下已经没有那么广泛的披露要求,最可能最初接受这些豁免。本文讨论了该研究结果对会计准则制定者、监管机构和政策制定者的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Value relevance of customer-related intangible assets Transparency and the audit industry? Not in the U.S. Evidence on audit production costs, profitability and partner compensation from the U.K. Financial statement comparability and segment disclosure The mitigation of high-growth-related accounting distortions after sarbanes-oxley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1