Auditor Pricing of Excess Cash Holdings

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.1177/0148558X15617396
Kimberly Gleason, Adam J. Greiner, Yezen H. Kannan
{"title":"Auditor Pricing of Excess Cash Holdings","authors":"Kimberly Gleason, Adam J. Greiner, Yezen H. Kannan","doi":"10.1177/0148558X15617396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine auditor business risk by analyzing the relation between excess cash holdings and auditor pricing behavior. Prior research links excess cash holdings to risks associated with manager opportunism and external monitoring. Our analyses provide evidence of a positive relationship between excess cash and audit fees. The economic magnitude of the increase in total audit fees due to an increase in excess cash holdings is approximately 5% greater for firms in the top quartile of excess cash holdings versus those in the bottom quartile. We also find that the strength of shareholder rights reduces the positive relationship between excess cash and audit fees, and excess cash holdings are assigned lower audit fees among firms that follow an investment-intensive strategy than those that tend to hold on to their cash. Our article contributes to the literature by examining auditor pricing of excess cash holdings, including factors that affect auditors’ risk perceptions, and ultimately provides unique insights into how auditors view agency conflicts indicated by excess cash holdings.","PeriodicalId":47160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance","volume":"9 1","pages":"423 - 443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X15617396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

We examine auditor business risk by analyzing the relation between excess cash holdings and auditor pricing behavior. Prior research links excess cash holdings to risks associated with manager opportunism and external monitoring. Our analyses provide evidence of a positive relationship between excess cash and audit fees. The economic magnitude of the increase in total audit fees due to an increase in excess cash holdings is approximately 5% greater for firms in the top quartile of excess cash holdings versus those in the bottom quartile. We also find that the strength of shareholder rights reduces the positive relationship between excess cash and audit fees, and excess cash holdings are assigned lower audit fees among firms that follow an investment-intensive strategy than those that tend to hold on to their cash. Our article contributes to the literature by examining auditor pricing of excess cash holdings, including factors that affect auditors’ risk perceptions, and ultimately provides unique insights into how auditors view agency conflicts indicated by excess cash holdings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计师超额现金持有定价
我们通过分析超额现金持有与审计师定价行为之间的关系来检验审计师的业务风险。先前的研究将过多的现金持有与管理者机会主义和外部监控相关的风险联系起来。我们的分析提供了多余现金与审计费用之间呈正相关关系的证据。超额现金持有量最高的四分之一公司与最低四分之一公司相比,由于超额现金持有量增加而导致的总审计费用增加的经济幅度大约高出5%。我们还发现,股东权利的强度降低了超额现金与审计费用之间的正相关关系,并且在遵循投资密集型战略的公司中,超额现金持有量的审计费用低于那些倾向于持有现金的公司。我们的文章通过研究审计师对超额现金持有的定价,包括影响审计师风险感知的因素,为文献做出了贡献,并最终提供了审计师如何看待超额现金持有所表明的机构冲突的独特见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance (JAAF) is committed to publishing high quality studies in accounting and related fields. Papers on accounting issues relating to developing in other fields such as finance, economics, and operations are also welcome. Empirical, analytical and experimental works of all varieties and paradigms, normative as well as positive, will be considered, provided they significantly contribute to the advancement of our knowledge in accounting. Manuscripts submitted should contain original unpublished research and should not be under consideration for possible publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Shared Auditors in Private Lending The Effects of Changes in Tick Size and Tax Rates on the Tax-Timing Option and the Market Response to Stock Distributions The Orbital Dynamics of Auditor Firm Rotation: Implications for Auditor Independence and Audit Quality Public Disclosure of Tax Strategies and Firm’s Actual Tax Policy Analysts’ Institutional Client Catering and Reputation Tradeoff: Strategic Timing of Recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1