Effectiveness of Antianxiety Drugs on Postoperative Pain Perception After Implant Placement: An In Vivo Study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Oral Research Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1177/2320206820981485
M. Tulsani, D. Ganapathy, D. Rupawat, Sanjana Devi
{"title":"Effectiveness of Antianxiety Drugs on Postoperative Pain Perception After Implant Placement: An In Vivo Study","authors":"M. Tulsani, D. Ganapathy, D. Rupawat, Sanjana Devi","doi":"10.1177/2320206820981485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of midazolam and zolpidem on postoperative pain perception in patients undergoing implant placement. Materials and Methods: In the present in vivo study 60 patients undergoing implant placement were selected based on the inclusion criteria framed and were randomly allocated using sequentially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelope (SNOSE) method into 3 groups with 20 patients each after obtaining informed consent. Group A was the control group, Group B received midazolam 7.5 mg 30 minutes before the procedure. Group C received zolpidem 5 mg 30 minutes before the procedure. The anxiety level of patients was recorded using the Corah scale and postoperative pain was recorded after 2 hours of implant placement using the VAS scale. Statistical analysis was done using analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way multivariate analysis of variance (one-way MANOVA), and then Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test for comparison among groups at the 0.05 level of significance. Results: Group A had a mean anxiety level of 16 ± 1.451, Group B had a mean anxiety level of 11.2 ± 2.858, and Group C had a mean anxiety level of 13 ± 2.9019 and a statistically significant difference between the groups was observed (P < .05). The mean for the postoperative pain perception for Group A was 6.8 ± 1.1965, for Group B was 3.8 ± 1.3611, and Group C was 5 ± 1.451 and a statistically significant difference between the groups was observed (P < .05). Conclusion: This study concluded that both midazolam and zolpidem significantly reduced anxiety levels and postoperative pain in patients undergoing implant placement.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2320206820981485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of midazolam and zolpidem on postoperative pain perception in patients undergoing implant placement. Materials and Methods: In the present in vivo study 60 patients undergoing implant placement were selected based on the inclusion criteria framed and were randomly allocated using sequentially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelope (SNOSE) method into 3 groups with 20 patients each after obtaining informed consent. Group A was the control group, Group B received midazolam 7.5 mg 30 minutes before the procedure. Group C received zolpidem 5 mg 30 minutes before the procedure. The anxiety level of patients was recorded using the Corah scale and postoperative pain was recorded after 2 hours of implant placement using the VAS scale. Statistical analysis was done using analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way multivariate analysis of variance (one-way MANOVA), and then Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test for comparison among groups at the 0.05 level of significance. Results: Group A had a mean anxiety level of 16 ± 1.451, Group B had a mean anxiety level of 11.2 ± 2.858, and Group C had a mean anxiety level of 13 ± 2.9019 and a statistically significant difference between the groups was observed (P < .05). The mean for the postoperative pain perception for Group A was 6.8 ± 1.1965, for Group B was 3.8 ± 1.3611, and Group C was 5 ± 1.451 and a statistically significant difference between the groups was observed (P < .05). Conclusion: This study concluded that both midazolam and zolpidem significantly reduced anxiety levels and postoperative pain in patients undergoing implant placement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗焦虑药物对种植体置入术后疼痛感知的有效性:一项体内研究
目的:评价咪达唑仑和唑吡坦对种植体植入术患者术后疼痛感知的影响。材料与方法:在体内研究中,根据制定的纳入标准,选择60例植入体患者,经知情同意后,采用顺序编号、不透明、密封信封(SNOSE)法随机分为3组,每组20例。A组为对照组,B组术前30分钟给予咪达唑仑7.5 mg。C组患者在手术前30分钟给予唑吡坦5 mg。采用Corah量表记录患者的焦虑水平,采用VAS量表记录植入2小时后患者的术后疼痛。统计学分析采用方差分析(ANOVA)、单因素方差分析(single - multivariate analysis of variance, single - MANOVA),组间比较采用Tukey’s honest Significant Difference (HSD)检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果:A组患者平均焦虑水平为16±1.451,B组患者平均焦虑水平为11.2±2.858,C组患者平均焦虑水平为13±2.9019,组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。A组术后疼痛感均值为6.8±1.1965,B组为3.8±1.3611,C组为5±1.451,组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:本研究得出咪达唑仑和唑吡坦均可显著降低种植体植入术患者的焦虑水平和术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Microbiological and Immunological Assessment of Peri-implant Sites in Healthy and Diabetic Individuals After Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Prospective Case Control Study Translucency and Color Difference of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: The Effect of Surface Finishing on Background Color Effects of Fluoride Varnish on Roughness of Polyacid-Modified Composite Resins at Different Temperatures: An In Vitro Study Synthesis and Characterization of Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles Based on Hemidesmus Indicus Extract: Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Bioactivity for Prosthetic Implant Coatings Comparative Evaluation of Penetrability of Various Bioceramic Sealers into the Tubules of Radicular Dentin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1