Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography and Muscle Fitness Relationships: Effects of Scanning Plane and Echogenicity Correction

IF 0.5 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS MLTJ-Muscles Ligaments and Tendons Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-23 DOI:10.3390/muscles2020010
C. Voskuil, Monique D. Dudar, Yan Zhang, J. Carr
{"title":"Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography and Muscle Fitness Relationships: Effects of Scanning Plane and Echogenicity Correction","authors":"C. Voskuil, Monique D. Dudar, Yan Zhang, J. Carr","doi":"10.3390/muscles2020010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationships between ultrasonography measurements of skeletal muscle size and echo intensity (EI) with muscle strength and local muscle endurance in a habitually resistance-trained population. Twenty young, healthy participants underwent imaging of the biceps brachii in the sagittal and transverse planes and with the extended field of view (EFOV) technique. Linear regression was used to examine measures of muscle thickness (MT), muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA), EI, and corrected EI (cEI) in each scanning plane for their associations with strength (1RM biceps curl) and local muscle endurance (4x failure @ 50%1RM). The strongest predictor of 1RM strength and local muscle endurance was sagittal MT (adj. R2 = 0.682) and sagittal cEI (adj. R2 = 0.449), respectively. Strength and transverse MT (R2 = 0.661) and the EFOV mCSA (R2 = 0.643) demonstrated a positive relationship. Local muscle endurance and cEI in the transverse plane (R2 = 0.265) and the EFOV scan (R2 = 0.309) demonstrated a negative relationship. No associations were shown with uncorrected EI. While each scanning plane supports the muscle size-strength and echogenicity-endurance relationships, sagittal plane imaging demonstrated the strongest associations with muscle fitness. These findings provide important methodological insights regarding ultrasound imaging and muscle fitness relationships.","PeriodicalId":46318,"journal":{"name":"MLTJ-Muscles Ligaments and Tendons Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MLTJ-Muscles Ligaments and Tendons Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/muscles2020010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between ultrasonography measurements of skeletal muscle size and echo intensity (EI) with muscle strength and local muscle endurance in a habitually resistance-trained population. Twenty young, healthy participants underwent imaging of the biceps brachii in the sagittal and transverse planes and with the extended field of view (EFOV) technique. Linear regression was used to examine measures of muscle thickness (MT), muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA), EI, and corrected EI (cEI) in each scanning plane for their associations with strength (1RM biceps curl) and local muscle endurance (4x failure @ 50%1RM). The strongest predictor of 1RM strength and local muscle endurance was sagittal MT (adj. R2 = 0.682) and sagittal cEI (adj. R2 = 0.449), respectively. Strength and transverse MT (R2 = 0.661) and the EFOV mCSA (R2 = 0.643) demonstrated a positive relationship. Local muscle endurance and cEI in the transverse plane (R2 = 0.265) and the EFOV scan (R2 = 0.309) demonstrated a negative relationship. No associations were shown with uncorrected EI. While each scanning plane supports the muscle size-strength and echogenicity-endurance relationships, sagittal plane imaging demonstrated the strongest associations with muscle fitness. These findings provide important methodological insights regarding ultrasound imaging and muscle fitness relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨骼肌超声与肌肉健康的关系:扫描平面和回声校正的影响
本研究探讨了骨骼肌大小和回声强度(EI)的超声测量与肌肉力量和局部肌肉耐力在习惯性阻力训练人群之间的关系。20名年轻健康的参与者接受了肱二头肌矢状面和横切面以及扩展视场(EFOV)技术的成像。线性回归用于检查每个扫描平面的肌肉厚度(MT)、肌肉横截面积(mCSA)、EI和校正EI (cEI),以了解它们与力量(1RM二头肌弯曲)和局部肌肉耐力(4x失败@ 50%1RM)的关联。矢状面MT (adj. R2 = 0.682)和矢状面cEI (adj. R2 = 0.449)分别是1RM强度和局部肌肉耐力的最强预测因子。强度与横MT (R2 = 0.661)和EFOV mCSA (R2 = 0.643)呈正相关。局部肌肉耐力与横切面cEI呈负相关(R2 = 0.265), EFOV扫描呈负相关(R2 = 0.309)。未校正的EI没有关联。虽然每个扫描平面都支持肌肉大小-力量和回声-耐力的关系,但矢状面成像显示与肌肉健康的关系最强。这些发现为超声成像和肌肉健康关系提供了重要的方法学见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: MLTJ (Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal) is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal, ligament, tendon, public health, exercise physiology and kinesiology issues. Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal (MLTJ) provides the platform for exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas. It is the official journal of the Italian Society of Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons (I.S.Mu.L.T.), Società Italiana Terapia con Onde D’urto (S.I.T.O.D.) and Società Italiana Studio Piede e Caviglia (S.I.S.P.E.C)
期刊最新文献
A Straightforward Approach to Analyze Skeletal Muscle MRI in Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy for Differential Diagnosis: A Systematic Review Efficacy of Electromyographic Biofeedback in the Recovery of the Vastus Lateralis after Knee Injury: A Single-Group Case Study The Correlation between Core Muscular Endurance, Body Composition, and Back Pain in Firefighters: An Observational Study Advances and Prospects in Understanding Vertebrate Cardiac Conduction System, Pacemaker Cell, and Cardiac Muscle Development: Toward Novel Biological Therapies Discrepancy of Beta-Hydroxybutyrate Measurements between a Blood Meter and GC-MS Methods in Healthy Humans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1