Interventions for the Management of Pain and Sedation in Newborns Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Drugs Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s40272-022-00546-7
Pyrola Bäcke, Matteo Bruschettini, Ylva Thernström Blomqvist, Greta Sibrecht, Emma Olsson
{"title":"Interventions for the Management of Pain and Sedation in Newborns Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Pyrola Bäcke,&nbsp;Matteo Bruschettini,&nbsp;Ylva Thernström Blomqvist,&nbsp;Greta Sibrecht,&nbsp;Emma Olsson","doi":"10.1007/s40272-022-00546-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborn infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH) are exposed to multiple painful and stressful procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to assess benefits and harms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the management of pain and sedation in newborn infants undergoing TH for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included randomized and observational studies reporting any intervention (either drugs or non-pharmacological interventions) to manage pain and sedation in newborn infants (> 33 weeks' gestational age) undergoing TH. We included any dose, duration and route of administration. We also included any type and duration of non-pharmacological interventions. Our prespecified primary outcomes were analgesia and sedation assessed using validated pain scales in the neonatal population; circulatory instability; mortality to discharge; and neurodevelopmental disability. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, with no language restrictions. Included studies underwent risk-of-bias assessment (Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and ROBINS-I) and data extraction performed by two authors independently. The plan had been to use effect measures such as mean difference for continuous outcomes and risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes, however the included studies are presented in a narrative synthesis due to their paucity and heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies involving 3551 infants were included-one trial and nine observational studies. Most studies examined the use of phenobarbital or other antiepileptic drugs with primary outcomes related to seizure activity. The single trial that was included compared pentoxifylline with placebo. Among the primary outcomes, six studies reported circulatory instability and five reported mortality to discharge without relevant differences; two studies reported on neurodevelopmental disability and one study reported on pain scale. Three studies were ongoing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found limited evidence to establish the benefits and harms of the interventions for the management of pain and sedation in newborn infants undergoing TH. Long-term outcomes were not reported. Given the very low certainty of evidence-due to imprecision of the estimates, inconsistency and limitations in study design (all nine observational studies with overall serious risk of bias)-for all outcomes, clinical trials are required to determine the most effective interventions in this population.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020205755.</p>","PeriodicalId":19955,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/6d/40272_2022_Article_546.PMC9810674.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-022-00546-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Newborn infants undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH) are exposed to multiple painful and stressful procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to assess benefits and harms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the management of pain and sedation in newborn infants undergoing TH for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Methods: We included randomized and observational studies reporting any intervention (either drugs or non-pharmacological interventions) to manage pain and sedation in newborn infants (> 33 weeks' gestational age) undergoing TH. We included any dose, duration and route of administration. We also included any type and duration of non-pharmacological interventions. Our prespecified primary outcomes were analgesia and sedation assessed using validated pain scales in the neonatal population; circulatory instability; mortality to discharge; and neurodevelopmental disability. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, with no language restrictions. Included studies underwent risk-of-bias assessment (Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and ROBINS-I) and data extraction performed by two authors independently. The plan had been to use effect measures such as mean difference for continuous outcomes and risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes, however the included studies are presented in a narrative synthesis due to their paucity and heterogeneity.

Results: Ten studies involving 3551 infants were included-one trial and nine observational studies. Most studies examined the use of phenobarbital or other antiepileptic drugs with primary outcomes related to seizure activity. The single trial that was included compared pentoxifylline with placebo. Among the primary outcomes, six studies reported circulatory instability and five reported mortality to discharge without relevant differences; two studies reported on neurodevelopmental disability and one study reported on pain scale. Three studies were ongoing.

Conclusions: We found limited evidence to establish the benefits and harms of the interventions for the management of pain and sedation in newborn infants undergoing TH. Long-term outcomes were not reported. Given the very low certainty of evidence-due to imprecision of the estimates, inconsistency and limitations in study design (all nine observational studies with overall serious risk of bias)-for all outcomes, clinical trials are required to determine the most effective interventions in this population.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020205755.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低氧缺血性脑病新生儿接受治疗性低温治疗时疼痛和镇静的干预措施:一项系统综述。
背景:接受治疗性低温(TH)的新生儿暴露于多个痛苦和压力的过程中。本系统综述的目的是评估药物和非药物干预对治疗缺氧缺血性脑病接受TH治疗的新生儿疼痛和镇静的利弊。方法:我们纳入了随机和观察性研究,这些研究报告了任何干预措施(药物或非药物干预)来控制接受TH的新生儿(> 33周胎龄)的疼痛和镇静。我们包括了任何剂量、持续时间和给药途径。我们还包括了任何类型和持续时间的非药物干预。我们预先指定的主要结局是在新生儿人群中使用经过验证的疼痛量表评估镇痛和镇静;循环不稳定;死亡至出院;以及神经发育障碍。在PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,没有语言限制。纳入的研究进行了偏倚风险评估(Cochrane风险-偏倚工具和ROBINS-I),并由两位作者独立进行了数据提取。本计划使用效果测量,如连续结果的平均差异和二分类结果的风险比,但由于其缺乏和异质性,纳入的研究以叙事综合的方式呈现。结果:纳入了10项涉及3551名婴儿的研究,其中1项试验研究和9项观察性研究。大多数研究检查了苯巴比妥或其他抗癫痫药物的使用,其主要结果与癫痫发作活动有关。纳入的单一试验比较了己酮茶碱和安慰剂。在主要结局中,6项研究报告了循环不稳定,5项研究报告了出院死亡率,但无相关差异;两项研究报告了神经发育障碍,一项研究报告了疼痛程度。三项研究正在进行中。结论:我们发现有限的证据来确定干预措施对接受TH的新生儿疼痛和镇静管理的利弊。未报道长期结果。由于估计的不精确、不一致和研究设计的局限性(所有9项观察性研究总体上存在严重的偏倚风险),所有结果的证据确定性都很低,因此需要进行临床试验来确定在该人群中最有效的干预措施。系统评价注册:PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020205755。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Drugs
Pediatric Drugs PEDIATRICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Drugs promotes the optimization and advancement of all aspects of pharmacotherapy for healthcare professionals interested in pediatric drug therapy (including vaccines). The program of review and original research articles provides healthcare decision makers with clinically applicable knowledge on issues relevant to drug therapy in all areas of neonatology and the care of children and adolescents. The Journal includes: -overviews of contentious or emerging issues. -comprehensive narrative reviews of topics relating to the effective and safe management of drug therapy through all stages of pediatric development. -practical reviews covering optimum drug management of specific clinical situations. -systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. -Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in the pediatric population. -original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pediatric Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review Impact of Prolonged Continuous Ketamine Infusions in Critically Ill Children: A Prospective Cohort Study. Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis: A Multi-center Retrospective Study from the Pediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN. Paediatric Drug Development in China: Current Status and Future Prospects. Commercial Versus Compounded Preparations in Pediatric Ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1