Pediatric Drugs最新文献

Background and objectives: Current data on ustekinumab therapy in children with ulcerative colitis (UC) or unclassified inflammatory bowel disease (IBDU) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in pediatric UC and IBDU.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 16 centers affiliated with the IBD Interest and Porto groups of ESPGHAN. Children with UC or IBDU treated with ustekinumab were enrolled. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and imaging data as well as adverse events were recorded. Analyses were all based on the intention-to-treat principle.

Results: Fifty-eight children (39 UC and 19 IBDU, median age 14.5 [IQR 11.5-16.5] years) were included. All had failed biologic therapies, and 38 (66%) had failed two or more biologics. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFR) was observed in 27 (47%), 33 (57%), and 37 (64%) children at 16, 26, and 52 weeks, respectively. Normalization of C-reactive protein and calprotectin < 150 μg/g were achieved in 60% and 52%, respectively, by 52 weeks. Endoscopic and radiologic remissions were reached in 8% and 23%, respectively. The main predictors of CFR were diagnosis of UC compared with IBDU (hazard ratio [HR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.03-4.85; p = 0.041) and no prior vedolizumab therapy (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.11-4.27; p = 0.023). Ustekinumab serum levels were not associated with disease activity. Adverse events were recorded in six (10%) children, leading to discontinuation of the drug in three.

Conclusion: Based on these findings, ustekinumab appears as an effective therapy for pediatric refractory UC and IBDU. The potential efficacy should be weighed against the risks of serious adverse events.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common rheumatic disorder in childhood and adolescence posing a significant threat of short-term and long-term disability if left untreated. Methotrexate is a folic acid analog with various immunomodulatory properties. It has demonstrated significant efficacy for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, often considered the preferred first-line disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug given as monotherapy or in combination with biological drugs. Despite this, there is a considerable risk for treatment disruptions owing to the high prevalence of methotrexate intolerance, with symptoms such as nausea, stomach ache, vomiting, and behavioral symptoms. Many different risk factors for the intolerance have been proposed including gender, age, disease activity, treatment duration, dosing and administration, and genetic and psychological factors. As the studies have shown contradictory results, many questions are left unanswered. Therefore, a consensus regarding outcome measures and reporting is crucial. In this review, we describe the identification and assessment of methotrexate intolerance and evaluate potential risk factors, genetic associations as well as management strategies.

Objective: The efficacy and safety of propranolol for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) remain under debate. This network meta-analysis (NMA) focuses on whether a ranking may be established for different dose levels of propranolol as treatment of ROP in terms of stage progression as the primary outcome, with appearance of plus disease and need for anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) or laser therapy as secondary endpoints.

Methods: Fourteen studies (10 randomised controlled trials, three single-arm trials and one retrospective observational study) of 474 patients treated with oral or ocular propranolol were retrieved from databases up to April 2024. Meta-insight and model-based NMA were undertaken to evaluate the propranolol dose-response relationship. Studies were evaluated for model fit, risk of bias and Confidence of evidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). Effect sizes were determined as odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI).

Results: Bayesian analysis showed a trend towards improved effects for propranolol given at late stages (stages 2-3; S23) of ROP progression compared with its administration at earlier stages (stages 0-1; S01). OR values for oral propranolol 1.5 and 2 mg/kg/day given at S23 were 0.13 (95% CrI 0.04-0.37) and 0.16 (95% CrI 0.04-0.61), respectively, while given at S01 were 0.28 (95% CrI 0.02-2.96) and 0.78 (95% CrI 0.14-4.43), respectively. Similarly, OR of eye propranolol 0.2% at S23 was 0.37 (95% CrI 0.09-1.00) versus an S01 OR of 0.64 (95% CrI 0.21-2.04). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analyses confirmed best probability values for oral propranolol 1.5-2 mg/kg followed by eye propranolol 0.2%, all at S23. Model-based NMA showed nonlinearity in the dose-response for oral propranolol with a trend to greater maximal effect for its administration at late versus early stages. For secondary endpoints, lower risk values were found with oral propranolol 1.5 mg/kg/day at S23 for progression to plus disease (OR 0.14; 95% CrI 0.02-0.84) and need for anti-VEGFs (OR 0.23; 95% CrI 0.05-0.93) and laser (OR 0.16; 95% CrI 0.02-1.10) therapies also followed by eye propranolol 0.2%, and a similar profile was obtained with SUCRA analysis. Lower doses (0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day) of oral propranolol retained efficacy. Threat of adverse events was estimated as risk difference versus control with no difference for eye propranolol 0.2% and oral propranolol 0.5 mg/kg/day, modest increases of risk for oral propranolol 1.0 and 1.5 mg/kg/day and the highest risk difference for oral propranolol 2.0 mg/kg/day (0.06; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.13).

Conclusion: A diminished risk of disease progression and need for additional treatment was obtained with propranolol in ROP, but safety is a potential concern. Propranolol eye micro-drops (0.2%) can be as efficacious as oral propranolol. Nonetheless, the evidence is limited due to the pa

Background: Ketamine has been considered as an adjunct for children who do not reach their predefined target sedation depth. However, there is limited evidence regarding the use of ketamine as a prolonged infusion (i.e., >24 hours) in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Objective: We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of continuous ketamine infusion for >24 hours in mechanically ventilated children.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in a tertiary PICU from January 2020 to December 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) after ketamine initiation. The secondary outcome included assessing the median proportion of time the patient spent on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) goal after ketamine infusion. Patients were also divided into two groups based on the sedative regimen, ketamine-based or non-ketamine-based, to assess the incidence of delirium.

Results: A total of 269 patients were enrolled: 73 in the ketamine group and 196 in the non-ketamine group. The median infusion rate of ketamine was 1.4 mg/kg/h. Delirium occurred in 16 (22%) patients with ketamine and 15 (7.6%) patients without ketamine (p = 0.006). After adjusting for covariates, logistic regression showed that delirium was associated with comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] 4.2), neurodevelopmental delay (OR 0.23), fentanyl use (OR 7.35), and ketamine use (OR 4.17). Thirty-one (42%) of the patients experienced at least one AE following ketamine infusion. Other AEs likely related to ketamine were hypertension (n = 4), hypersecretion (n = 14), tachycardia (n = 6), and nystagmus (n = 2). There were no significant changes in hemodynamic variables 24 h after the initiation of ketamine. Regarding the secondary outcomes, patients were at their goal RASS level for a median of 76% (range 68-80.5%) of the time in the 24 hours before ketamine initiation, compared with 84% (range 74.5-90%) of the time during the 24 h after ketamine initiation (p < 0.001). The infusion rate of ketamine did not significantly affect concomitant analgesic and sedative infusions. The ketamine group experienced a longer duration of mechanical ventilation and a longer length of stay in the PICU and hospital than the non-ketamine group.

Conclusion: The use of ketamine infusion in PICU patients may be associated with an increased rate of adverse events, especially delirium. High-quality studies are needed before ketamine can be broadly recommended or adopted earlier in the sedation protocol.

For more than two decades, regulatory agencies throughout the world released guidelines, rules and laws to stimulate and assist in paediatric drug development. In 2014, the National Health and Family Planning Commission (now known as the National Health Commission, NHC) and five other departments in China jointly issued 'Several Opinions on Safeguarding Medication for Children', after which several policies and regulations were issued to implement the priority review and approval of paediatric medicinal products and support the development of new drugs, including new dosage forms and strengths, for children. A total of 172 special medicinal products for children were approved from 2018 to 2022. Since 2016, the NHC, together with relevant administrative departments, has formulated and issued four paediatric drug lists containing 129 medicinal products to encourage research and development. At present, approximately 25 of these drugs (at exactly the same dosage forms and strengths as on the lists) have been approved for marketing, including antitumour drugs and immunomodulators, nervous system drugs, drugs for mental disorders and drugs for rare diseases. In this review, we analysed the regulations issued for promoting paediatric drug development in China, including the priority review and approval system, technical guidelines, data protection and financial support policies and general profiles of paediatric drug approval, clinical trials and the addition of information for children in the labels of marketed medicinal products. Finally, we discussed the challenges and possible strategies in the research and development of paediatric drugs in China.

Many conditions managed by pediatric ophthalmologists are rare diseases, and even if pharmacological treatments are available, these have often not been evaluated in children. Off-label prescribing is a common practice in pediatric ophthalmology. In addition, there is often no commercial case for the production of a medicine that may only be used for a small number of patients worldwide. Compounded preparations prepared locally are therefore still in frequent use, although it is known that production may not meet stringent quality assurance standards. For several indications, commercial preparations, evaluated in rigorous clinical trials with children, are now available. Myopia management is joining the list of these indications, with low-concentration atropine formulations derived from recent clinical trials in Australia, USA, and Europe now entering the market. This short article gives an overview of the background and recent developments of compounded and commercial preparations for use in pediatric ophthalmology.

Opioid therapy is the mainstay for managing pain in pediatric oncology. This narrative review describes the current literature regarding opioids for pediatric cancer pain. The review explores the multifaceted landscape of opioid utilization in this population, including the role of opioids in certain clinical circumstances, modalities of opioid delivery, unique opioids, outpatient and at-home pain management strategies, and other key concepts such as breakthrough pain. This review highlights the importance of individualized dosing and multimodal approaches to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects. Drawing from a wide range of evidence, this review offers insights to optimize pediatric oncology pain management.

Background: Children treated in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) often receive several drugs together, among them drugs defined as high-alert medications (HAMs). Those drugs carry a high risk of causing patient harm, for example, due to a higher potential for interactions. HAMs should therefore be administered with caution, especially in a PICU.

Objectives: The objective of the current study was to identify drug-drug interactions involving HAMs that increase the risk of interaction-associated symptoms in pediatric intensive care.

Methods: In a retrospective study, we analyzed the electronic documentation of patients hospitalized for at least 48 h in a general PICU who received at least two different drugs within a 24-h interval. We assessed potential drug-drug interactions involving HAM on the basis of the two drug information databases UpToDate and drugs.com. Furthermore, we analyzed whether symptoms were observed after the administration of drug pairs that could lead to interaction-associated symptoms. For drug pairs involving HAM administered on at least 2% of patient days, and symptoms observed at least ten times after a respective drug pair, we calculated odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values by using a univariate binary logistic regression.

Results: Among 315 analyzed patients, 81.3% (256/315) received drugs defined as high-alert medication for pediatric patients. Those high-alert medications were involved in 20,150 potential drug-drug interactions. In 14.0% (2830/20,150) of these, one or more symptoms were observed that could be a possible consequence of the interaction, resulting in 3203 observed symptoms affecting 56.3% (144/256) of patients receiving high-alert medication. The odds ratios for symptoms observed after a drug-drug interaction were increased for eight specific symptoms (each p ≤ 0.05), especially hemodynamic alterations and disturbances of electrolyte and fluid balance. The odds ratio was highest for decreased blood pressure observed after the administration of the drug pair fentanyl and furosemide (OR 5.06; 95% confidence interval 3.5-7.4; p < 0.001). Increased odds ratios for specific symptoms observed after drug-drug interactions resulted from eight combinations composed of eight different drugs: digoxin, fentanyl, midazolam, phenobarbital, potassium salts and vancomycin (high-alert medications), and the diuretics furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide (non-high-alert medications). The resulting drug pairs were: potassium salts-furosemide, fentanyl-furosemide, vancomycin-furosemide, digoxin-furosemide, digoxin-hydrochlorothiazide, fentanyl-phenobarbital, potassium salts-hydrochlorothiazide, and midazolam-hydrochlorothiazide.

Conclusions: In a cohort of PICU patients, this study identified eight specific drug pairs involving high-alert medications that may increase the risk of interaction-associa

Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the leading causes of death. Safe and timely medical interventions, especially in children, can prolong their survival. The drugs prescribed for children with CHD are mainly based on the outcomes of drug therapy in adults with cardiovascular diseases, and their adverse drug reactions (ADRs) might be different. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate ADRs in children with CHD.

Methods: This was a scoping review conducted in 2023. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases were searched. All studies that reported ADRs for children with CHD and were published in English by 1 November 2023 were included in this study. Finally, the results were reported using a content analysis method.

Results: A total of 87 articles were included in the study. The results showed that symptoms/signs/clinical findings, and cardiovascular disorders were the most common ADRs reported in children with CHD. The results also showed that most of the ADRs were reported for prostaglandin E1, amiodarone, prostaglandin E2, dexmedetomidine, and captopril, respectively.

Conclusion: The review underscores the wide array of ADRs in children with CHD, particularly in antiarrhythmics, diuretics, beta-blockers, anticoagulants, and vasodilators, which affected cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, metabolic, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. Tailored treatment is imperative, considering individual patient characteristics, especially in the vulnerable groups. Further research is essential for optimizing dosing, pharmacogenetics, and alternative therapies to enhance patient outcomes in CHD management.