Exercise Intensity in Track and Level-grade Treadmill Running: A Cross-over Longitudinal Study in Well-trained Athletes

Aldo F. Longo, E. Prada, Marcelo L. Cardey, Gustavo D. Aquilino
{"title":"Exercise Intensity in Track and Level-grade Treadmill Running: A Cross-over Longitudinal Study in Well-trained Athletes","authors":"Aldo F. Longo, E. Prada, Marcelo L. Cardey, Gustavo D. Aquilino","doi":"10.24018/ejsport.2022.1.6.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heart rate is a conventional indicator of exercise intensity. Diverse studies have reported results of the comparison between the heart rate responses attained during running overground and on a treadmill; non-unanimous conclusions have emerged. The intention of this study was to compare the exercise intensity through heart rate between progressive running tests performed on track and level-grade treadmills. The heart rate responses of twelve highly trained male athletes were analyzed (Age = 24.3±2.7 years). The running protocol had initial and final speeds of 11 km·h−1 and 18 km·h−1, and increments of 0.5 km·h−1 every 200 m. Two tests were performed: on an outdoor 400 m track, and a level-grade motorized treadmill under laboratory conditions. An innovative data analysis approach was proposed, by using a linear mixed-effects model, with the Test and Speed stage and their interaction as fixed factors, and the Subject as a random factor; a suitable correlation structure was also specified. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. The difference between tests was not significant (F = 0.06, p = 0.81). The interaction effect between the Test and Speed stage was also not significant (F = 1.32, p = 0.19). Exercise intensity as measured by heart rate showed similar mean responses in track and level-grade treadmill running across a wide range of speeds in well-trained athletes.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsport.2022.1.6.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heart rate is a conventional indicator of exercise intensity. Diverse studies have reported results of the comparison between the heart rate responses attained during running overground and on a treadmill; non-unanimous conclusions have emerged. The intention of this study was to compare the exercise intensity through heart rate between progressive running tests performed on track and level-grade treadmills. The heart rate responses of twelve highly trained male athletes were analyzed (Age = 24.3±2.7 years). The running protocol had initial and final speeds of 11 km·h−1 and 18 km·h−1, and increments of 0.5 km·h−1 every 200 m. Two tests were performed: on an outdoor 400 m track, and a level-grade motorized treadmill under laboratory conditions. An innovative data analysis approach was proposed, by using a linear mixed-effects model, with the Test and Speed stage and their interaction as fixed factors, and the Subject as a random factor; a suitable correlation structure was also specified. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. The difference between tests was not significant (F = 0.06, p = 0.81). The interaction effect between the Test and Speed stage was also not significant (F = 1.32, p = 0.19). Exercise intensity as measured by heart rate showed similar mean responses in track and level-grade treadmill running across a wide range of speeds in well-trained athletes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轨道和水平级跑步机的运动强度:训练良好的运动员的交叉纵向研究
心率是衡量运动强度的常规指标。不同的研究报告了在地上跑步和在跑步机上跑步时心率反应的比较结果;出现了不一致的结论。本研究的目的是通过心率比较在跑道和水平级跑步机上进行的渐进式跑步测试的运动强度。对12名高训练男性运动员(年龄= 24.3±2.7岁)的心率反应进行了分析。跑步方案的初始和最终速度分别为11 km·h−1和18 km·h−1,每200 m增加0.5 km·h−1。进行了两项试验:在室外400米跑道上进行试验,在实验室条件下在平地电动跑步机上进行试验。提出了一种创新的数据分析方法,采用线性混合效应模型,将测试阶段和速度阶段及其相互作用作为固定因素,受试者作为随机因素;并确定了合适的关联结构。差异有统计学意义,p < 0.05。两组间差异无统计学意义(F = 0.06, p = 0.81)。测试阶段与速度阶段的交互作用也不显著(F = 1.32, p = 0.19)。通过心率测量的运动强度显示,训练有素的运动员在跑道和水平级跑步机上在大范围速度下跑步时的平均反应相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Physiological Approach to Cardio-endurance Training: Indicators of Optimal Parasympathetic Input on Cardiovascular Regulation are Better Predictors of Running Performance of Distance Runners Impact of Coaches’ Transformational Leadership on Soccer Players’ Satisfaction in Selected Ethiopian Super and National League Football Clubs Major International Competition Funding and Money Laundering Risks Starting and Specialisation Ages of Elite Athletes across Olympic Sports: An International Cross-sectional Study Effect of Different Foam Rolling Sensitivities on the Amount of Change in Range of Motion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1