A comparative study of clonidine versus dexmedetomidine in attenuation of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation

Divya, Karthikeya Jampala, K. Radhika
{"title":"A comparative study of clonidine versus dexmedetomidine in attenuation of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation","authors":"Divya, Karthikeya Jampala, K. Radhika","doi":"10.26611/101517312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Endotracheal intubation produces various cardio vascular complications. Sometimes these complications lead to mortality. Various anaesthetic drugs are tried before intubation to reduce the haemodynamic changes. The present study aimed to evaluate the clonidine versus dexmedetomidine in attenuation of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Materials and Methods: The study was done in Department of Anaesthesia , Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Foundation, Trivandrum, Kerala. A total of 50 patients included in the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into two group each of 25. G-I received Clonidine (2mcg/kg) and G-II Dexmedetomidine (0.5mcg/kg). Drugs are given to respective groups 10 min before induction. Demographic data (age and gender) and clinical data (heart rate, SBP, DBP and MAP) was recorded. SPSS (20.0) version was used for analysis. Results: Group-I and II not showed any significant difference on comparison of demographic data. Comparison of mean heart rate between the group-I and II not showed any significant difference. SBP (PI, AL), DBP (PI) and MAP (PI) showed significant difference when compared between the group-I and II. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in the dose of 0.5µg/kg, given 10 minutes before laryngoscopy and intubation is better choice than clonidine in attenuating the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.","PeriodicalId":18595,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/101517312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal intubation produces various cardio vascular complications. Sometimes these complications lead to mortality. Various anaesthetic drugs are tried before intubation to reduce the haemodynamic changes. The present study aimed to evaluate the clonidine versus dexmedetomidine in attenuation of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Materials and Methods: The study was done in Department of Anaesthesia , Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Foundation, Trivandrum, Kerala. A total of 50 patients included in the study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into two group each of 25. G-I received Clonidine (2mcg/kg) and G-II Dexmedetomidine (0.5mcg/kg). Drugs are given to respective groups 10 min before induction. Demographic data (age and gender) and clinical data (heart rate, SBP, DBP and MAP) was recorded. SPSS (20.0) version was used for analysis. Results: Group-I and II not showed any significant difference on comparison of demographic data. Comparison of mean heart rate between the group-I and II not showed any significant difference. SBP (PI, AL), DBP (PI) and MAP (PI) showed significant difference when compared between the group-I and II. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in the dose of 0.5µg/kg, given 10 minutes before laryngoscopy and intubation is better choice than clonidine in attenuating the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可乐定与右美托咪定对喉镜和插管后应激反应衰减的比较研究
背景:气管插管可引起多种心血管并发症。有时这些并发症会导致死亡。插管前尝试各种麻醉药物以减少血流动力学变化。本研究旨在评价可乐定与右美托咪定在喉镜检查和插管后的应激反应的衰减。材料和方法:研究在印度喀拉拉邦特里凡得琅的Sree Gokulam医学院麻醉科和研究基金会完成。本研究共纳入50例患者,根据纳入和排除标准,分为两组,每组25例。G-I组给予可乐定(2mcg/kg), G-II组给予右美托咪定(0.5mcg/kg)。诱导前10分钟给药。记录人口统计学数据(年龄和性别)和临床数据(心率、收缩压、舒张压和MAP)。采用SPSS(20.0)版本进行分析。结果:i组与II组人口学资料比较无显著性差异。i组与II组平均心率比较无明显差异。SBP (PI, AL)、DBP (PI)、MAP (PI)在i组与II组比较差异有统计学意义。结论:右旋美托咪定在喉镜插管前10分钟给予0.5µg/kg剂量比可乐定更能降低喉镜插管后的血流动力学反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of sedation levels and adverse effects axillary brachial plexus block with magnesium sulphate and bupivacaine Efficacy of intravenous nitroglycerine in attenuation of hemodynamic response to tracheal extubation A comparative study of different types of video laryngoscopes in viewing ease and time of Intubation and laryngoscopic response A comparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine to provide prolonged postoperative analgesia A comparative study of supreme laryngeal mask airway versus laryngeal tube undergoing general anesthesia in short surgical procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1