From Adversaries to Allies? The Uneasy Relationship between Experts and the Wikipedia Community

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sheji.2020.12.003
Piotr Konieczny
{"title":"From Adversaries to Allies? The Uneasy Relationship between Experts and the Wikipedia Community","authors":"Piotr Konieczny","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2020.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As Wikipedia approaches its 20th anniversary, this article explores the complex relationship between the Wikipedia world and the world of academia. This article examines the ongoing debate about the quality and reliability of Wikipedia and its relationship to traditional reference works. It also examines the difficulties of experts who try to contribute to Wikipedia. It also considers the clash between amateur and expert practices of knowledge production and the lack of professional motivation for using Wikipedia in education and research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 151-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.12.003","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405872621000356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

As Wikipedia approaches its 20th anniversary, this article explores the complex relationship between the Wikipedia world and the world of academia. This article examines the ongoing debate about the quality and reliability of Wikipedia and its relationship to traditional reference works. It also examines the difficulties of experts who try to contribute to Wikipedia. It also considers the clash between amateur and expert practices of knowledge production and the lack of professional motivation for using Wikipedia in education and research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从对手到盟友?专家和维基百科社区之间的不安关系
在维基百科成立20周年之际,本文探讨了维基百科世界与学术界之间的复杂关系。本文探讨了关于维基百科的质量和可靠性及其与传统参考文献的关系的持续争论。它还考察了试图为维基百科做出贡献的专家所面临的困难。它还考虑了知识生产的业余和专家实践之间的冲突,以及在教育和研究中使用维基百科缺乏专业动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Reconceptualizing the Notion of Values in Design Talk Value Dimensions in Creative Collaborations for Social Innovation The Tools of the Trade: Cultures, Devices, and Valuation Practices in Urban Design Creating and Testing a Guideline for Governing Blockchain Ecosystems: A Study Informed by Design Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1