Understanding the Impressions, Motivations, and Barriers of One Time Code Contributors to FLOSS Projects: A Survey

Amanda Lee, Jeffrey C. Carver, Amiangshu Bosu
{"title":"Understanding the Impressions, Motivations, and Barriers of One Time Code Contributors to FLOSS Projects: A Survey","authors":"Amanda Lee, Jeffrey C. Carver, Amiangshu Bosu","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.2017.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects must attract and retain high-quality talent. Researchers have invested considerable effort in the study of core and peripheral FLOSS developers. To this point, one critical subset of developers that have not been studied are One-Time code Contributors (OTC) – those that have had exactly one patch accepted. To understand why OTCs have not contributed another patch and provide guidance to FLOSS projects on retaining OTCs, this study seeks to understand the impressions, motivations, and barriers experienced by OTCs. We conducted an online survey of OTCs from 23 popular FLOSS projects. Based on the 184 responses received, we observed that OTCs generally have positive impressions of their FLOSS project and are driven by a variety of motivations. Most OTCs primarily made contributions to fix bugs that impeded their work and did not plan on becoming long term contributors. Furthermore, OTCs encounter a number of barriers that prevent them from continuing to contribute to the project. Based on our findings, there are some concrete actions FLOSS projects can take to increase the chances of converting OTCs into long-term contributors.","PeriodicalId":6505,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"31 1","pages":"187-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"91","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2017.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

Abstract

Successful Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects must attract and retain high-quality talent. Researchers have invested considerable effort in the study of core and peripheral FLOSS developers. To this point, one critical subset of developers that have not been studied are One-Time code Contributors (OTC) – those that have had exactly one patch accepted. To understand why OTCs have not contributed another patch and provide guidance to FLOSS projects on retaining OTCs, this study seeks to understand the impressions, motivations, and barriers experienced by OTCs. We conducted an online survey of OTCs from 23 popular FLOSS projects. Based on the 184 responses received, we observed that OTCs generally have positive impressions of their FLOSS project and are driven by a variety of motivations. Most OTCs primarily made contributions to fix bugs that impeded their work and did not plan on becoming long term contributors. Furthermore, OTCs encounter a number of barriers that prevent them from continuing to contribute to the project. Based on our findings, there are some concrete actions FLOSS projects can take to increase the chances of converting OTCs into long-term contributors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解一次性代码贡献者对FLOSS项目的印象、动机和障碍:调查
成功的自由/自由开源软件(FLOSS)项目必须吸引和留住高质量的人才。研究人员已经在核心和外围FLOSS开发人员的研究上投入了相当多的精力。到目前为止,尚未研究的开发人员的一个关键子集是一次性代码贡献者(OTC)——那些只接受了一个补丁的开发人员。为了理解为什么otc没有贡献另一个补丁,并为FLOSS项目提供关于保留otc的指导,本研究试图理解otc的印象、动机和障碍。我们对23个流行的FLOSS项目的ota进行了在线调查。根据收到的184个答复,我们观察到,otc通常对他们的FLOSS项目有积极的印象,并且受到各种动机的驱动。大多数otc的贡献主要是修复阻碍他们工作的错误,并没有计划成为长期贡献者。此外,otc遇到了许多阻碍他们继续为项目做出贡献的障碍。根据我们的发现,FLOSS项目可以采取一些具体的行动来增加将otc转化为长期贡献者的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Unpacking of Android Apps Symbolic Model Extraction for Web Application Verification On Cross-Stack Configuration Errors Syntactic and Semantic Differencing for Combinatorial Models of Test Designs Fuzzy Fine-Grained Code-History Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1