{"title":"Evolution of Water Institutions in the Indus River Basin: Reflections from the Law of the Colorado River","authors":"E. Sattar, J. Robison, D. McCool","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3023589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transboundary water institutions in the Indus River Basin can be fairly characterized as broken in key respects. International relations between India and Pakistan over the Indus Waters Treaty, as well as interprovincial relations within Pakistan over the 1991 Water Accord, speak to this sentiment. Stemming from research undertaken by the authors for the Harvard Water Federalism Project and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), this Article seeks to spur the evolution of the Indus River Basin’s water institutions by offering a comparative perspective from North America’s most “institutionally encompassed” basin, the Colorado River Basin. Mindful of the importance of context for comparative water law and policy scholarship, the Article begins with overviews of the Colorado and Indus basins. In turn, the Article considers in greater detail major water-related challenges facing the latter basin, including climate change and overallocation. Against this backdrop, the Article ultimately turns to analysis and prescription. Examining a host of topics involving transboundary water allocation, conservation, and governance, the Article considers key institutions associated with these topics in the Colorado River Basin and reflects on how, if at all, they may serve as reference points for institutional evolution in the Indus Basin. Many of the proposals in the Article are expensive. But compared to military operations, they are quite modest in terms of expense and minimize the risk of loss of life and destruction of property. Still, the Article prioritizes solutions that maximize individual and local freedom to the greatest extent possible. This means relying upon voluntary market-based transfers that protect the vulnerable, favoring incentives rather than regulations, and creating a reward structure that includes benefits other than water.","PeriodicalId":83420,"journal":{"name":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3023589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Transboundary water institutions in the Indus River Basin can be fairly characterized as broken in key respects. International relations between India and Pakistan over the Indus Waters Treaty, as well as interprovincial relations within Pakistan over the 1991 Water Accord, speak to this sentiment. Stemming from research undertaken by the authors for the Harvard Water Federalism Project and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), this Article seeks to spur the evolution of the Indus River Basin’s water institutions by offering a comparative perspective from North America’s most “institutionally encompassed” basin, the Colorado River Basin. Mindful of the importance of context for comparative water law and policy scholarship, the Article begins with overviews of the Colorado and Indus basins. In turn, the Article considers in greater detail major water-related challenges facing the latter basin, including climate change and overallocation. Against this backdrop, the Article ultimately turns to analysis and prescription. Examining a host of topics involving transboundary water allocation, conservation, and governance, the Article considers key institutions associated with these topics in the Colorado River Basin and reflects on how, if at all, they may serve as reference points for institutional evolution in the Indus Basin. Many of the proposals in the Article are expensive. But compared to military operations, they are quite modest in terms of expense and minimize the risk of loss of life and destruction of property. Still, the Article prioritizes solutions that maximize individual and local freedom to the greatest extent possible. This means relying upon voluntary market-based transfers that protect the vulnerable, favoring incentives rather than regulations, and creating a reward structure that includes benefits other than water.
印度河流域的跨界水机制在关键方面可以说是破碎的。印度和巴基斯坦在《印度河水域条约》上的国际关系,以及巴基斯坦在1991年《水协议》上的省际关系,都说明了这种情绪。本文源于作者为哈佛水联邦制项目(Harvard Water Federalism Project)和美国国际开发署(USAID)所做的研究,试图通过提供一个与北美最“制度包含”的流域——科罗拉多河流域进行比较的视角,来推动印度河流域水制度的演变。考虑到比较水法和政策学术背景的重要性,本文首先概述了科罗拉多和印度河流域。反过来,文章更详细地考虑了后一个流域面临的主要与水有关的挑战,包括气候变化和过度分配。在此背景下,本文最终转向分析与处方。本文考察了涉及跨界水资源分配、保护和治理的一系列主题,考虑了科罗拉多河流域与这些主题相关的关键机构,并反思了它们如何(如果有的话)可以作为印度河流域制度演变的参考点。文章中的许多建议都是昂贵的。但与军事行动相比,它们在费用方面相当适度,并将生命损失和财产破坏的风险降至最低。尽管如此,该条款仍优先考虑最大限度地实现个人和地方自由的解决方案。这意味着依靠保护弱势群体的基于市场的自愿转移,支持激励而不是监管,并建立包括水以外利益的奖励结构。