Not yet ‘Back to Sleep’: sleep position for infants in two inner-city clinics

Eve R Colson, Christopher J Stille, Jessica Payton, Bruce Bernstein, Paul Dworkin
{"title":"Not yet ‘Back to Sleep’: sleep position for infants in two inner-city clinics","authors":"Eve R Colson,&nbsp;Christopher J Stille,&nbsp;Jessica Payton,&nbsp;Bruce Bernstein,&nbsp;Paul Dworkin","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00096.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><b>Objective</b> To estimate the occurrence of prone sleep among a group of infants in two inner-city clinics and examine the factors associated with parents' choice of sleep position</p>\n <p><b>Methods</b> A convenience sample of 80 parents (76 mothers and 4 fathers) was interviewed between June and October 1997, during their healthy, term infant's 2-week health supervision visit. The interview included questions about sleep position practices, knowledge, and beliefs; knowledge about Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS); education about SIDS; and socio-demographic data. All participants received post-interview SIDS education.</p>\n <p><b>Results</b> Thirty-one percent of parents reported that they placed their infants to sleep in the prone position at least some of the time. Factors associated with prone sleeping included prior child-rearing experience (<i>P</i> = 0.005) and the opinion of other people that were regarded as important (<i>P</i> = 0.0001). Only 20% of parents usually had their child sleep on its back. The majority worried that the child would vomit and choke while lying on its back. Parents who chose to position their infant to sleep on its back were less likely to describe themselves as Hispanic (<i>P</i> = 0.025) and more likely to remember being told to have the infant sleep on its back by a health care provider (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Just over one-half of parents recall receiving sleep position instructions from a health care provider. More than 60% of these parents remember being told to place the infant on the side, 24% the back and none prone. Teen parents were more likely to remember being given sleep instructions (<i>P</i> = 0.033). Parents with older children were less likely to remember receiving sleep position instructions (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions/implications for practice</b> Many parents in our urban practice still put their children to sleep in the prone position at least some of the time. Family and friends, as well as prior child-rearing experience influence the choice. Parents are more likely to choose the supine position if they are instructed to do so by a health care provider. However, many parents do not recall such instruction being routinely given by their health care provider and have concerns for the safety of supine sleeping. Efforts to promote sleeping on the back should address parental concerns and health care provider practice.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100075,"journal":{"name":"Ambulatory Child Health","volume":"6 4","pages":"269-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00096.x","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambulatory Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1467-0658.2000.00096.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective To estimate the occurrence of prone sleep among a group of infants in two inner-city clinics and examine the factors associated with parents' choice of sleep position

Methods A convenience sample of 80 parents (76 mothers and 4 fathers) was interviewed between June and October 1997, during their healthy, term infant's 2-week health supervision visit. The interview included questions about sleep position practices, knowledge, and beliefs; knowledge about Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS); education about SIDS; and socio-demographic data. All participants received post-interview SIDS education.

Results Thirty-one percent of parents reported that they placed their infants to sleep in the prone position at least some of the time. Factors associated with prone sleeping included prior child-rearing experience (P = 0.005) and the opinion of other people that were regarded as important (P = 0.0001). Only 20% of parents usually had their child sleep on its back. The majority worried that the child would vomit and choke while lying on its back. Parents who chose to position their infant to sleep on its back were less likely to describe themselves as Hispanic (P = 0.025) and more likely to remember being told to have the infant sleep on its back by a health care provider (P = 0.001). Just over one-half of parents recall receiving sleep position instructions from a health care provider. More than 60% of these parents remember being told to place the infant on the side, 24% the back and none prone. Teen parents were more likely to remember being given sleep instructions (P = 0.033). Parents with older children were less likely to remember receiving sleep position instructions (P = 0.001).

Conclusions/implications for practice Many parents in our urban practice still put their children to sleep in the prone position at least some of the time. Family and friends, as well as prior child-rearing experience influence the choice. Parents are more likely to choose the supine position if they are instructed to do so by a health care provider. However, many parents do not recall such instruction being routinely given by their health care provider and have concerns for the safety of supine sleeping. Efforts to promote sleeping on the back should address parental concerns and health care provider practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尚未“回归睡眠”:两家市中心诊所婴儿的睡眠姿势
目的了解北京市两所门诊婴儿俯卧睡姿的发生情况,探讨影响家长睡姿选择的因素。方法于1997年6月至10月对80名家长(76名母亲和4名父亲)进行随访,并对其进行为期2周的健康监护。访谈包括关于睡姿练习、知识和信仰的问题;关于婴儿猝死综合症(SIDS)的知识;关于小岛屿发展中国家的教育;以及社会人口统计数据。所有参与者都接受了访谈后的小岛屿发展中国家教育。31%的父母报告说,他们至少在某些时候让孩子俯卧睡觉。与俯卧睡眠相关的因素包括以前的育儿经历(P = 0.005)和被认为重要的其他人的意见(P = 0.0001)。只有20%的父母通常让孩子仰卧睡觉。大多数人担心孩子会在仰卧时呕吐和窒息。选择让婴儿仰卧睡觉的父母不太可能将自己描述为西班牙裔(P = 0.025),更有可能记得被卫生保健提供者告知让婴儿仰卧睡觉(P = 0.001)。超过一半的父母回忆起从医疗保健提供者那里得到的睡眠姿势指导。这些父母中超过60%的人记得,他们被告知要让婴儿侧卧,24%的人仰着,没有人俯卧。青少年父母更有可能记得被给予睡眠指导(P = 0.033)。年龄较大的孩子的父母不太可能记得接受过睡眠姿势指导(P = 0.001)。在我们的城市实践中,许多父母至少在某些时候仍然让他们的孩子以俯卧姿势睡觉。家庭和朋友,以及之前的育儿经历都会影响这个选择。如果医护人员要求父母仰卧,他们更有可能选择仰卧的姿势。然而,许多家长不记得他们的卫生保健提供者经常给予这样的指导,并担心仰卧睡眠的安全性。努力促进仰卧睡觉应该解决父母的担忧和卫生保健提供者的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The greatest impact of war and conflict Child, adolescent and student health monitor Social gradients in child health: why do they occur and what can paediatricians do about them? Current literature Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1