A Strategic Approach for Producing a PCP Well with High Flowline Pressures in a Restricted System

Melissa Persad, Nigel Ramkhalawan
{"title":"A Strategic Approach for Producing a PCP Well with High Flowline Pressures in a Restricted System","authors":"Melissa Persad, Nigel Ramkhalawan","doi":"10.2118/200964-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A progressive cavity pump (PCP) well (S-648) remotely located in Heritage's offshore field was unable to produce since October 2018 due to high flowline pressures. This paper describes the approach that was taken to produce the well and initiatives undertaken to resolve challenges.\n Analysis of the fluid properties was conducted for input into a multiphase flow simulation software. The software was utilized to determine flowline restriction and a solution to reducing flowline pressures by viscosity reduction and flowline replacement. Since subsea flowline replacement is a costly and time-consuming exercise, a laboratory viscosity evaluation was done utilizing a chemical viscosity reducer. The results were inputted into the software to determine the percentage reduction in flowline pressure for producing the well.\n The chemical solution was applied despite multiple challenges. Infrastructure on the location was a challenge with no pneumatic or 110V electrical supply to operate the chemical injection pump, limited space on the well deck for a chemical tank and no access to refill the chemical tank. Initiatives were taken to resolve these challenges and commission the injection. Upon commissioning of the chemical injection system, the flowline pressure reduced by approximately 70% and the well was able to restart and sustain production until this day. The initial chemical injection rate was optimized downwards for reducing the operating costs for the well without increase in the flowline pressure.\n Testing facilities were not available for this well at start up to quantify production, however pump functionality checks were being done to assure that fluid was moving through the system. The pump is capable of a flowrate of 200 barrels per day. Assuming 80% pump efficiency, the initial estimate of production gain from this initiative was approximately 70 barrels of oil per day. When testing facilities became available in February 2020, the well tested production was 172 barrels of oil per day.\n This approach can be utilized to start up and produce wells with high flowline pressures in an offshore environment within a short timeframe, where restrictions are present and modifying/replacing flowlines is not possible or cost effective.","PeriodicalId":11142,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, June 30, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200964-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A progressive cavity pump (PCP) well (S-648) remotely located in Heritage's offshore field was unable to produce since October 2018 due to high flowline pressures. This paper describes the approach that was taken to produce the well and initiatives undertaken to resolve challenges. Analysis of the fluid properties was conducted for input into a multiphase flow simulation software. The software was utilized to determine flowline restriction and a solution to reducing flowline pressures by viscosity reduction and flowline replacement. Since subsea flowline replacement is a costly and time-consuming exercise, a laboratory viscosity evaluation was done utilizing a chemical viscosity reducer. The results were inputted into the software to determine the percentage reduction in flowline pressure for producing the well. The chemical solution was applied despite multiple challenges. Infrastructure on the location was a challenge with no pneumatic or 110V electrical supply to operate the chemical injection pump, limited space on the well deck for a chemical tank and no access to refill the chemical tank. Initiatives were taken to resolve these challenges and commission the injection. Upon commissioning of the chemical injection system, the flowline pressure reduced by approximately 70% and the well was able to restart and sustain production until this day. The initial chemical injection rate was optimized downwards for reducing the operating costs for the well without increase in the flowline pressure. Testing facilities were not available for this well at start up to quantify production, however pump functionality checks were being done to assure that fluid was moving through the system. The pump is capable of a flowrate of 200 barrels per day. Assuming 80% pump efficiency, the initial estimate of production gain from this initiative was approximately 70 barrels of oil per day. When testing facilities became available in February 2020, the well tested production was 172 barrels of oil per day. This approach can be utilized to start up and produce wells with high flowline pressures in an offshore environment within a short timeframe, where restrictions are present and modifying/replacing flowlines is not possible or cost effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在受限体系中生产高流线压力PCP井的策略方法
自2018年10月以来,由于流线压力过高,位于Heritage海上油田的渐进式空腔泵(PCP)井(S-648)无法生产。本文介绍了该井的生产方法以及为解决挑战所采取的措施。对流体特性进行了分析,并输入到多相流仿真软件中。该软件用于确定流线限制以及通过降低粘度和更换流线来降低流线压力的解决方案。由于海底管线更换是一项昂贵且耗时的工作,因此使用化学降粘剂进行了实验室粘度评估。结果被输入到软件中,以确定生产井的流线压力降低百分比。尽管面临诸多挑战,但该化学溶液仍得到了应用。现场的基础设施是一个挑战,没有气动或110V电力供应来运行化学注入泵,井甲板上的化学罐空间有限,也没有重新填充化学罐的通道。为了解决这些挑战,我们采取了一些措施,并委托注入。在化学注入系统投入使用后,管线压力降低了约70%,油井得以重新启动并维持生产。为了在不增加管线压力的情况下降低作业成本,初始化学剂注入速率向下优化。该井在启动时没有测试设备来量化产量,但是进行了泵功能检查,以确保流体在系统中流动。该泵每天的流量可达200桶。假设80%的泵效率,最初估计从该计划中获得的产量约为70桶/天。当测试设施于2020年2月投入使用时,经过测试的产量为每天172桶石油。这种方法可以在短时间内用于在海上环境中具有高流线压力的井的启动和生产,在这些环境中存在限制,并且不可能修改/更换流线或成本不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Lower Cruse and Navet Formations Within the Wd-8 Lease Operatorship Block Experimental Separation Performance of In-Line Piggable Liquid Removal Unit – Pseudo Dry Gas Systems 20 Years of Independent Oil and Gas Audits: The Trinidad and Tobago Story An Intelligent Completion and Artificial Lift Technology to Develop Large Carbonate Reservoirs: Novel Completion and Zonal Water Injection via Remote Control Methods to Develop Horizontal Wells Development Features of Cold Production with Horizontal Wells in a Foamy Extra-Heavy Oil Reservoir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1