Philosophical Analysis of the Concept Human Situation

Pub Date : 2022-12-25 DOI:10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.827
V. Kaluha, O. Ishchenko, O. Koliada, V. Puhach, Yuliia Sierova, N. Yukhymenko, Lesia Levchenko
{"title":"Philosophical Analysis of the Concept Human Situation","authors":"V. Kaluha, O. Ishchenko, O. Koliada, V. Puhach, Yuliia Sierova, N. Yukhymenko, Lesia Levchenko","doi":"10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern man, community, and humanity as a whole have become apprehensive about their future. Globally, there is a particular concern about the paradoxical tying of the Gordian knot, which is essentially triggered by contradictions caused by antagonistic problems in the fields of ecology, demography and economics. There are several ways to overcome the challenge that the world and man face. Firstly, radical, when one of the spheres is given in for the sake of one or two others. Secondly, the systematic distraction of the masses from critical issues. Thirdly, alternative, the shift of attention from popular methods and means of solving the current critical problems in favor of non-linear ones, i.e. those related to unconventional views on a given problem and approaches to its solution. Understanding of the human situation can lead to some encouraging results by means of focusing attention of the significant majority of the humankind represented by the so-called leaders of public opinion. Basically, under given circumstances, the principle, according to which real change starts with the people themselves, their intention to change, will be effective. In this case, in contrast to violence, coercion, manipulation, bribery and blackmail, the modus operandi of maintaining social interaction will be responsibility, meaningfulness, respect, a sense of proportion and tact.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v24i4.827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern man, community, and humanity as a whole have become apprehensive about their future. Globally, there is a particular concern about the paradoxical tying of the Gordian knot, which is essentially triggered by contradictions caused by antagonistic problems in the fields of ecology, demography and economics. There are several ways to overcome the challenge that the world and man face. Firstly, radical, when one of the spheres is given in for the sake of one or two others. Secondly, the systematic distraction of the masses from critical issues. Thirdly, alternative, the shift of attention from popular methods and means of solving the current critical problems in favor of non-linear ones, i.e. those related to unconventional views on a given problem and approaches to its solution. Understanding of the human situation can lead to some encouraging results by means of focusing attention of the significant majority of the humankind represented by the so-called leaders of public opinion. Basically, under given circumstances, the principle, according to which real change starts with the people themselves, their intention to change, will be effective. In this case, in contrast to violence, coercion, manipulation, bribery and blackmail, the modus operandi of maintaining social interaction will be responsibility, meaningfulness, respect, a sense of proportion and tact.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
“人的处境”概念的哲学分析
现代人、社会和人类作为一个整体已经对他们的未来感到忧虑。在全球范围内,人们特别关注戈蒂安结的矛盾关系,这主要是由生态、人口和经济领域的对立问题所引起的矛盾所引发的。有几种方法可以克服世界和人类面临的挑战。首先是激进的,当一个领域为了另一个或两个领域而放弃时。第二,有计划地分散群众对关键问题的注意力。第三,另类,将注意力从解决当前关键问题的流行方法和手段转向非线性问题,即对给定问题及其解决方法的非常规观点。通过把以所谓舆论领袖为代表的绝大多数人的注意力集中起来,对人类局势的了解可以导致一些令人鼓舞的结果。基本上,在特定的情况下,真正的改变从人民自己开始的原则,他们改变的意图,将是有效的。在这种情况下,与暴力、胁迫、操纵、贿赂和勒索相比,维持社会互动的方式将是责任、意义、尊重、分寸和机智。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1