Communities of Inquiry and the Case of the "Distance Education" Group during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Theodora Kavoura
{"title":"Communities of Inquiry and the Case of the \"Distance Education\" Group during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Theodora Kavoura","doi":"10.24018/ejeng.2022.1.cie.2964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework, successful learning experiences are supported by the presence and interaction of cognitive, social, and teaching elements. Since the CoI Framework has been widely used to examine the quality of educational interactions, its applicability to non-formal education has not been adequately explored. This research is a case study of the \"Distance Education\" group on Facebook. It was mainly carried out during a period of restrictions due to COVID-19, when most schools in Greece remained closed.\nThis study explores the process by which shared understanding and learning were fostered in a Peer-to-Peer setting of teachers. Through group exploration and interaction team members were able to provide solutions and answers while focused discussion and smooth functioning were controlled by administrators who were also educators.\nThe results of this research show the presence of social, cognitive, and teaching elements during the discussions. Similarly, the findings of the analysis of the discussions show that they contained content directly related to the learning activities, thus indicating the presence of the cognitive component. Off-topic discussions helped develop social relationships. Overall, when interpreted within the framework of CoI, the results reveal that all three components of an effective online learning experience were present in the context of Peer-to-Peer conversations between teachers.\nThe most important finding is that during the pandemic, teachers had to develop reciprocal relationships and create common plans and projects that helped them overcome difficulties and, finally, reflect dialectically on the extraordinary conditions created by the pandemic. The results of the research can be used by professionals who wish to apply the framework in a non-formal educational setting.","PeriodicalId":12001,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2022.1.cie.2964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Framework, successful learning experiences are supported by the presence and interaction of cognitive, social, and teaching elements. Since the CoI Framework has been widely used to examine the quality of educational interactions, its applicability to non-formal education has not been adequately explored. This research is a case study of the "Distance Education" group on Facebook. It was mainly carried out during a period of restrictions due to COVID-19, when most schools in Greece remained closed. This study explores the process by which shared understanding and learning were fostered in a Peer-to-Peer setting of teachers. Through group exploration and interaction team members were able to provide solutions and answers while focused discussion and smooth functioning were controlled by administrators who were also educators. The results of this research show the presence of social, cognitive, and teaching elements during the discussions. Similarly, the findings of the analysis of the discussions show that they contained content directly related to the learning activities, thus indicating the presence of the cognitive component. Off-topic discussions helped develop social relationships. Overall, when interpreted within the framework of CoI, the results reveal that all three components of an effective online learning experience were present in the context of Peer-to-Peer conversations between teachers. The most important finding is that during the pandemic, teachers had to develop reciprocal relationships and create common plans and projects that helped them overcome difficulties and, finally, reflect dialectically on the extraordinary conditions created by the pandemic. The results of the research can be used by professionals who wish to apply the framework in a non-formal educational setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间的咨询社区和“远程教育”群体案例
根据探究共同体(CoI)框架,成功的学习经验是由认知、社会和教学要素的存在和相互作用所支持的。由于CoI框架已被广泛用于检查教育互动的质量,因此尚未充分探讨其对非正规教育的适用性。本研究以Facebook上的“远程教育”群组为例进行研究。这主要是在新冠肺炎限制期间进行的,当时希腊的大多数学校都处于关闭状态。本研究探讨了在教师的点对点环境中,共同理解和学习的培养过程。通过小组探索和互动,团队成员能够提供解决方案和答案,而重点讨论和顺利运作由管理员(也是教育工作者)控制。研究结果显示,讨论过程中存在社会、认知和教学因素。同样,对讨论的分析结果表明,它们包含与学习活动直接相关的内容,从而表明认知成分的存在。离题讨论有助于发展社会关系。总的来说,当在CoI的框架内解释时,结果表明,有效在线学习体验的所有三个组成部分都存在于教师之间的点对点对话中。最重要的发现是,在大流行期间,教师必须发展互惠关系,制定共同的计划和项目,帮助他们克服困难,最后辩证地反思大流行造成的特殊条件。研究结果可以被希望在非正式教育环境中应用该框架的专业人员使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transitioning from “Grey to Green”: Nature-Based Solution Seawall for Coastal Protection Effectiveness of Suspended Lead Dampers in Steel Building Structural Model Subjected to Impact Load Effective Use of Catastrophe Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Delineating Groundwater Recharge Potential Zones Design of an Energy Efficient Buck Based LED Driver in DCM and CCM Visualization of Chladni Patterns at Low-Frequency Resonant and Non-Resonant Flexural Modes of Vibration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1