Case studies and lessons learned from parks and preservation

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Practice Pub Date : 2017-08-11 DOI:10.1080/14660466.2017.1356669
Marie C. Campbell, Carrie Chasteen, A. Madsen, Clint Helton, Ansley Davies
{"title":"Case studies and lessons learned from parks and preservation","authors":"Marie C. Campbell, Carrie Chasteen, A. Madsen, Clint Helton, Ansley Davies","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2017.1356669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article was presented at the 2017 Annual Conference of the National Association of Environmental Professionals, in Durham, North Carolina. The presentation described case studies for public properties being managed at the federal and state level, where significant historical resources and unique archeological resources are known to be present or have a high probability to be present. This article focuses on the exemplary and proactive investigation undertaken by the County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation to complete evaluations and prepare an inventory of structures, buildings, objects, and sites to assess their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and/or the County of Los Angeles Register of Landmarks and Historic Districts. The County of Los Angeles park system is in one of the nation’s largest municipal park systems, serving 10.02 million residents. The inventory was undertaken to identify those structures, buildings, objects, and sites that are eligible individually or as a historic district and provide guidelines for management consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and the National Park Service’s Preservation Briefs. In addition to the inventory and evaluation, the project led to development of a Worker Education and Awareness Program (WEAP) and a Cultural Resource Management Plan (CRMP). The case study and management approach will be outlined in a manner that would be suitable for application to federal, state, or local park systems or individual properties.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"170 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2017.1356669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article was presented at the 2017 Annual Conference of the National Association of Environmental Professionals, in Durham, North Carolina. The presentation described case studies for public properties being managed at the federal and state level, where significant historical resources and unique archeological resources are known to be present or have a high probability to be present. This article focuses on the exemplary and proactive investigation undertaken by the County of Los Angeles Department of Parks and Recreation to complete evaluations and prepare an inventory of structures, buildings, objects, and sites to assess their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and/or the County of Los Angeles Register of Landmarks and Historic Districts. The County of Los Angeles park system is in one of the nation’s largest municipal park systems, serving 10.02 million residents. The inventory was undertaken to identify those structures, buildings, objects, and sites that are eligible individually or as a historic district and provide guidelines for management consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and the National Park Service’s Preservation Briefs. In addition to the inventory and evaluation, the project led to development of a Worker Education and Awareness Program (WEAP) and a Cultural Resource Management Plan (CRMP). The case study and management approach will be outlined in a manner that would be suitable for application to federal, state, or local park systems or individual properties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
案例研究和从公园和保护中学到的经验教训
本文发表于2017年在北卡罗来纳州达勒姆举行的全国环境专业人士协会年会上。该报告描述了联邦和州一级管理公共财产的案例研究,其中已知存在或极有可能存在重要的历史资源和独特的考古资源。本文重点介绍洛杉矶县公园和娱乐部门开展的示范性和前瞻性调查,以完成对建筑物、建筑物、物体和遗址的评估和编制清单,以评估其列入国家史迹名录、加州历史资源名录和/或洛杉矶县地标和历史街区名录的资格。洛杉矶县公园系统是全国最大的市政公园系统之一,为1002万居民提供服务。该清单的目的是确定那些建筑物、建筑物、物体和遗址,这些建筑物、建筑物和遗址可以单独或作为一个历史街区,并为管理提供指导方针,以符合内政部长的《历史财产处理标准》和国家公园管理局的《保护简报》。除了盘点和评估,该项目还推动制定了《工人教育和意识计划》(WEAP)和《文化资源管理计划》(CRMP)。案例研究和管理方法将以适用于联邦、州或地方公园系统或个人财产的方式进行概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Practice
Environmental Practice ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals
期刊最新文献
Anthropological approaches for cultural resource conservation design and planning Cultural resources and landscape conservation design and planning Moving beyond the ecosystem in ecosystem health report cards Food Loss and Food Waste, Causes and Solutions Last issue of Environmental Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1