Interview with Sandrayati Moniaga: Legal pluralism and the struggle for recognition of customary rights in Indonesia

D. Roth, Sandra Moniaga
{"title":"Interview with Sandrayati Moniaga: Legal pluralism and the struggle for recognition of customary rights in Indonesia","authors":"D. Roth, Sandra Moniaga","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2021.2017641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this conversation with Sandrayati Moniaga I aim to get a better picture of the ways in which knowledge of the scientific concept and debates about legal pluralism are given a place in more practically and policy-oriented forms of engagement in Indonesia. Throughout her career, Sandrayati Moniaga (Jakarta, 1961) has combined these two dimensions—command of the concept of legal pluralism and more practical engagement with the political and policy worlds in which legal pluralism plays a role. She has an academic background in law, having studied Law in Bandung (West Java). During this period, she also had the opportunity, as an extra-curricular activity, to visit various minority groups in Indonesia. During such field visits she became keenly aware of the often marginalized position of indigenous groups and the important and problematic role of legal pluralism in their relationships with the Indonesian state. After graduating, Sandra became active in various Indonesian NGOs, such as WALHI (Indonesian Forum for the Environment), ELSAM (The Institute for Policy Research and Advocacy), Lembaga Bela Banua Talino (LBBT, a Kalimantan-based indigenous peoples’ legal resources development facilitator) and HuMa (Association for Community and Ecology-Based Law Reform). In her career she built an extensive working experience in leading positions and as an advisor of various NGOs. Currently she is a Commissioner for Assessment and Research of the Indonesian National Human Rights Commission (KOMNAS HAM). She has published scientific articles on, among others, the emergence of the indigenous peoples’ movement in the 1990s and on issues of ethnic identity and legal pluralism in relation to land and forest tenure and conflicts. Indonesia, an archipelago of more than 17,000 islands with a current total population of around 270 million, is a country of great ethnic, cultural, and religious diversity. It has a turbulent history of ruthless exploitation under Dutch colonial rule, a long independence struggle (1945–1949) against the Dutch, and a post-colonial era marked by extended periods of social conflict, political struggle and mass violence. Indonesia’s ethnic minority groups, in particular, have suffered from growing exploitation and related social, cultural, economic and political marginalization from colonial times onwards. Exploitation of land, forest and other resources caused","PeriodicalId":44432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.2017641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this conversation with Sandrayati Moniaga I aim to get a better picture of the ways in which knowledge of the scientific concept and debates about legal pluralism are given a place in more practically and policy-oriented forms of engagement in Indonesia. Throughout her career, Sandrayati Moniaga (Jakarta, 1961) has combined these two dimensions—command of the concept of legal pluralism and more practical engagement with the political and policy worlds in which legal pluralism plays a role. She has an academic background in law, having studied Law in Bandung (West Java). During this period, she also had the opportunity, as an extra-curricular activity, to visit various minority groups in Indonesia. During such field visits she became keenly aware of the often marginalized position of indigenous groups and the important and problematic role of legal pluralism in their relationships with the Indonesian state. After graduating, Sandra became active in various Indonesian NGOs, such as WALHI (Indonesian Forum for the Environment), ELSAM (The Institute for Policy Research and Advocacy), Lembaga Bela Banua Talino (LBBT, a Kalimantan-based indigenous peoples’ legal resources development facilitator) and HuMa (Association for Community and Ecology-Based Law Reform). In her career she built an extensive working experience in leading positions and as an advisor of various NGOs. Currently she is a Commissioner for Assessment and Research of the Indonesian National Human Rights Commission (KOMNAS HAM). She has published scientific articles on, among others, the emergence of the indigenous peoples’ movement in the 1990s and on issues of ethnic identity and legal pluralism in relation to land and forest tenure and conflicts. Indonesia, an archipelago of more than 17,000 islands with a current total population of around 270 million, is a country of great ethnic, cultural, and religious diversity. It has a turbulent history of ruthless exploitation under Dutch colonial rule, a long independence struggle (1945–1949) against the Dutch, and a post-colonial era marked by extended periods of social conflict, political struggle and mass violence. Indonesia’s ethnic minority groups, in particular, have suffered from growing exploitation and related social, cultural, economic and political marginalization from colonial times onwards. Exploitation of land, forest and other resources caused
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专访Sandrayati monaga:印尼法律多元主义与争取承认习惯权利的斗争
在这次与Sandrayati monaga的对话中,我的目标是更好地了解科学概念的知识和关于法律多元化的辩论是如何在印度尼西亚更实际和以政策为导向的参与形式中占有一席之地的。在她的整个职业生涯中,Sandrayati monaga(雅加达,1961)将这两个维度结合在一起——掌握法律多元主义的概念,以及更实际地参与法律多元主义发挥作用的政治和政策领域。她具有法律学术背景,曾在万隆(西爪哇)学习法律。在此期间,作为一项课外活动,她也有机会访问了印度尼西亚的各个少数民族。在这些实地访问中,她敏锐地意识到土著群体往往处于边缘地位,以及法律多元化在土著群体与印度尼西亚国家的关系中所起的重要而有问题的作用。毕业后,桑德拉活跃于印尼多个非政府组织,如印尼环境论坛(WALHI)、政策研究与倡导研究所(ELSAM)、kalimantan原住民法律资源开发促进会Lembaga Bela Banua Talino,以及社区与生态法律改革协会(HuMa)。在她的职业生涯中,她在领导岗位上积累了丰富的工作经验,并担任过各种非政府组织的顾问。目前,她是印度尼西亚国家人权委员会(KOMNAS HAM)评估和研究专员。她发表的科学文章除其他外,涉及1990年代土著人民运动的出现以及与土地和森林权属及冲突有关的族裔特性和法律多元化问题。印度尼西亚是一个由17,000多个岛屿组成的群岛,目前总人口约为2.7亿,是一个民族,文化和宗教多样性极大的国家。在荷兰殖民统治下,它经历了残酷的剥削,经历了长期的独立斗争(1945-1949),以及以长期的社会冲突、政治斗争和大规模暴力为特征的后殖民时代。特别是印度尼西亚的少数民族群体,从殖民时代开始就遭受日益严重的剥削和相关的社会、文化、经济和政治边缘化。开发利用土地、森林等资源造成的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: As the pioneering journal in this field The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JLP) has a long history of publishing leading scholarship in the area of legal anthropology and legal pluralism and is the only international journal dedicated to the analysis of legal pluralism. It is a refereed scholarly journal with a genuinely global reach, publishing both empirical and theoretical contributions from a variety of disciplines, including (but not restricted to) Anthropology, Legal Studies, Development Studies and interdisciplinary studies. The JLP is devoted to scholarly writing and works that further current debates in the field of legal pluralism and to disseminating new and emerging findings from fieldwork. The Journal welcomes papers that make original contributions to understanding any aspect of legal pluralism and unofficial law, anywhere in the world, both in historic and contemporary contexts. We invite high-quality, original submissions that engage with this purpose.
期刊最新文献
Construing the transformed property paradigm of South Africa’s water law: new opportunities presented by legal pluralism? Wait, what are we fighting about? – Kelsen, Ehrlich and the reconciliation of normative jurisprudence and sociology of law Interview article: water movements’ defense of the right to water. From the European arena to the Dutch exception Scientific versus folk legal pluralism An exploration of legal pluralism, power and custom in South Africa. A conversation with Aninka Claassens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1