Physiological Significance of Myocardial Bridging by Fractional Flow Reserve—An Observational Study

A. Panda, K. Jain, Harish Reddy M.S
{"title":"Physiological Significance of Myocardial Bridging by Fractional Flow Reserve—An Observational Study","authors":"A. Panda, K. Jain, Harish Reddy M.S","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1744276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Myocardial bridge (MB) is a portion of an epicardial coronary artery that takes an intramuscular course. The systolic compression of MB often gets carried over to early and mid-diastole, compromising coronary blood flow. In clinical practice, we encounter patients with angina, non-invasive evidence of ischemia, and a MB as the only relevant finding on angiography. In view of studies in support of decreased coronary flow reserve in MB, we assessed the physiological significance of MB by fractional flow reserve (FFR).\n Methods and Results We enrolled eight patients with chronic stable angina and positive noninvasive stress test, who had no significant CAD, and with evidence of MB in the left anterior descending artery. Mean age of population was 57.14 ± 6.25 years. Two (25%) were females and six (75%) were males. Four (50%) were smokers, five (62.5%) were diabetics, and two (25%) were hypertensives. Mean length of MB is 19.4 ± 5.04 mm. All underwent physiological assessment by FFR and the baseline, post nitroglycerin (NTG), and post adenosine readings were noted. Mean pre-NTG value, post-NTG, and post-adenosine were 0.974 ± 0.022, 0.96 ± 0.03, and 0.88 ± 0.042 (≤0.80 hemodynamically significant) respectively. Paired t-test showed significant reduction in FFR after NTG (p = 0.0452) and post-adenosine (p = 0.011) but all eight patients did not get significant FFR.\n Conclusion MB was found to be physiologically insignificant in our group of patients. But a statistical significant reduction of FFR in MB, post NTG and post adenosine, does impress on the fact that, an extensive study over a longer period of course, could throw light on this unsettled area of physiological significance and optimal therapeutic approach.","PeriodicalId":92905,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS","volume":"336 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myocardial bridge (MB) is a portion of an epicardial coronary artery that takes an intramuscular course. The systolic compression of MB often gets carried over to early and mid-diastole, compromising coronary blood flow. In clinical practice, we encounter patients with angina, non-invasive evidence of ischemia, and a MB as the only relevant finding on angiography. In view of studies in support of decreased coronary flow reserve in MB, we assessed the physiological significance of MB by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods and Results We enrolled eight patients with chronic stable angina and positive noninvasive stress test, who had no significant CAD, and with evidence of MB in the left anterior descending artery. Mean age of population was 57.14 ± 6.25 years. Two (25%) were females and six (75%) were males. Four (50%) were smokers, five (62.5%) were diabetics, and two (25%) were hypertensives. Mean length of MB is 19.4 ± 5.04 mm. All underwent physiological assessment by FFR and the baseline, post nitroglycerin (NTG), and post adenosine readings were noted. Mean pre-NTG value, post-NTG, and post-adenosine were 0.974 ± 0.022, 0.96 ± 0.03, and 0.88 ± 0.042 (≤0.80 hemodynamically significant) respectively. Paired t-test showed significant reduction in FFR after NTG (p = 0.0452) and post-adenosine (p = 0.011) but all eight patients did not get significant FFR. Conclusion MB was found to be physiologically insignificant in our group of patients. But a statistical significant reduction of FFR in MB, post NTG and post adenosine, does impress on the fact that, an extensive study over a longer period of course, could throw light on this unsettled area of physiological significance and optimal therapeutic approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分流血流储备对心肌桥接的生理意义——一项观察性研究
心肌桥(MB)是心外膜冠状动脉肌内通道的一部分。MB的收缩期压迫常延续到舒张早期和中期,影响冠状动脉血流。在临床实践中,我们遇到心绞痛患者,无创缺血证据,MB作为血管造影的唯一相关发现。鉴于支持MB降低冠状动脉血流储备的研究,我们通过血流储备分数(FFR)评估MB的生理意义。方法和结果我们招募了8例慢性稳定型心绞痛患者,无创应激试验阳性,无明显CAD,左前降支有MB证据。人口平均年龄57.14±6.25岁。2例(25%)为女性,6例(75%)为男性。吸烟者4人(50%),糖尿病患者5人(62.5%),高血压患者2人(25%)。MB平均长度为19.4±5.04 mm。所有患者均通过FFR进行生理评估,并记录基线、硝酸甘油(NTG)后和腺苷后读数。ntg前、ntg后和ntg后的平均腺苷值分别为0.974±0.022、0.96±0.03和0.88±0.042(血流动力学意义≤0.80)。配对t检验显示,NTG后(p = 0.0452)和腺苷后(p = 0.011)的FFR显著降低,但8例患者均未获得显著的FFR。结论本组患者MB在生理上不明显。但是,统计上显着的MB, NTG后和腺苷后FFR的减少确实给人留下了深刻的印象,当然,在更长的时间内进行广泛的研究,可以阐明这一尚未确定的生理意义领域和最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Right Heart Catheterization-Revisited Assessment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease as Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease Relationship between Serum Sex Hormones and Coronary Artery Disease in Premenopausal Women – A Missing Link? A Rare Case of Postpartum Native Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis with Septic Pulmonary Embolization Gender Specific Difference and Clinical Spectrum of COVID-19 Patients Admitted in Tertiary Care Hospital of Northern India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1