Optimization of response to selection using genomic selection in indigenous chicken breeding programmes

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE South African Journal of Animal Science Pub Date : 2022-05-09 DOI:10.4314/sajas.v51i6.5
C. W. Ndung’u, T. Muasya, T. Okeno
{"title":"Optimization of response to selection using genomic selection in indigenous chicken breeding programmes","authors":"C. W. Ndung’u, T. Muasya, T. Okeno","doi":"10.4314/sajas.v51i6.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study tested the hypothesis that the use of pooled genetic and phenotypic parameters and genomic selection would optimize selection response in indigenous chicken breeding programmes. This premise was tested with deterministic simulation in three breeding schemes based on the sources of information used to estimate breeding values. These schemes used a conventional breeding scheme with non-pooled parameters (CSN), pooled parameters (CSP), and genomic information in a genomic selection scheme (GSS). A one-tier closed nucleus breeding programme was considered with a mating ratio of 1 to 5 for males to females, Four traits were used in the breeding goal, namely live weight at twelve weeks (LW), egg number for twelve weeks (EN), age at first egg (AFE), and antibody response (Ab). The genetic gain for CSN was 1.5 times higher than that of CSP. The rate of inbreeding for CSN was 19% lower than in CSP. The accuracy of selection followed the same trend with CSN producing 9% higher accuracy of selection than CSP. The GSS scheme resulted in an additional 59.3% genetic gain and 30% accuracy compared with CSP. The GSS scheme also had a reduced rate of inbreeding by 46% compared with CSP. When compared with CSN, GSS produced 38.7% greater genetic gain, a 27% lower rate of inbreeding and 21.0% higher accuracy of selection. Use of pooled parameter estimates and genomic information optimized response to selection, whereas non-pooled inputs overestimated and underestimated rates of genetic gain and inbreeding.","PeriodicalId":21869,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Animal Science","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v51i6.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that the use of pooled genetic and phenotypic parameters and genomic selection would optimize selection response in indigenous chicken breeding programmes. This premise was tested with deterministic simulation in three breeding schemes based on the sources of information used to estimate breeding values. These schemes used a conventional breeding scheme with non-pooled parameters (CSN), pooled parameters (CSP), and genomic information in a genomic selection scheme (GSS). A one-tier closed nucleus breeding programme was considered with a mating ratio of 1 to 5 for males to females, Four traits were used in the breeding goal, namely live weight at twelve weeks (LW), egg number for twelve weeks (EN), age at first egg (AFE), and antibody response (Ab). The genetic gain for CSN was 1.5 times higher than that of CSP. The rate of inbreeding for CSN was 19% lower than in CSP. The accuracy of selection followed the same trend with CSN producing 9% higher accuracy of selection than CSP. The GSS scheme resulted in an additional 59.3% genetic gain and 30% accuracy compared with CSP. The GSS scheme also had a reduced rate of inbreeding by 46% compared with CSP. When compared with CSN, GSS produced 38.7% greater genetic gain, a 27% lower rate of inbreeding and 21.0% higher accuracy of selection. Use of pooled parameter estimates and genomic information optimized response to selection, whereas non-pooled inputs overestimated and underestimated rates of genetic gain and inbreeding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基因组选择优化地方鸡育种计划对选择的响应
本研究验证了一种假设,即使用混合遗传和表型参数以及基因组选择可以优化本地鸡育种计划中的选择反应。基于估计育种值的信息源,对三种育种方案进行了确定性模拟。这些方案采用常规育种方案,在基因组选择方案(GSS)中加入非池参数(CSN)、池参数(CSP)和基因组信息。采用一层闭核育种方案,雌雄配种比例为1:5,以12周活重(LW)、12周卵数(EN)、首卵龄(AFE)和抗体应答(Ab) 4个性状作为育种目标。CSN的遗传增益是CSP的1.5倍。CSN的近交率比CSP低19%。结果表明,CSN的选择精度比CSP高9%。与CSP方案相比,GSS方案的遗传增益增加59.3%,准确率提高30%。与CSP相比,GSS方案的近交率也降低了46%。与CSN相比,GSS的遗传增益提高38.7%,近交率降低27%,选择精度提高21.0%。混合参数估计和基因组信息的使用优化了对选择的响应,而非混合输入高估和低估了遗传增益和近交率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Animal Science
South African Journal of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Animal Science is an open access, peer-reviewed journal for publication of original scientific articles and reviews in the field of animal science. The journal publishes reports of research dealing with production of farmed animal species (cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, poultry and ostriches), as well as pertinent aspects of research on aquatic and wildlife species. Disciplines covered nutrition, genetics, physiology, and production systems. Systematic research on animal products, behaviour, and welfare are also invited. Rigorous testing of well-specified hypotheses is expected.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the efficiency of smallholder wool farmers in the changing paradigms of the Free State province of South Africa In vitro ruminal fermentation parameters of canola meal protein in response to incremental doses of gamma irradiation Effects of yeast hydrolysate versus plasma powder on growth, immunity, and intestinal morphology of weanling piglets Performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on diets with different levels of concentrate Synthesis and antibacterial activity of a ZnO-fibre complex
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1